...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Knoxville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a dog bite injury, choosing skilled legal representation is paramount to ensuring that your rights are protected. Carlson Bier, a preeminent personal injury law firm in Illinois, has an impressive track record in successfully handling dog bite cases. With our profound understanding of related laws and adept negotiation skills, we can help you seek due compensation for medical expenses and emotional distress caused by such incidents. Despite the complexity of these cases often rooted in discerning liability or proving negligence, our experienced lawyers maintain unmatched dedication to achieving favorable outcomes for clients involved in dog bite injuries – helping them reclaim their lives after traumatic experiences. We pride ourselves on delivering personalized guidance throughout this daunting legal journey with utmost professionalism and empathy. Choosing Carlson Bier translates into confidence – knowing that your case is handled by accomplished experts proficient at navigating intricacies inherent in dog-bite litigation law practice areas.So consider Carlson Bier when seeking exceptional Dog Bite Injury advocacy; no matter where you are from —our reach extends beyond geographical boundaries towards justice!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Knoxville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are fully committed to safeguarding the rights of individuals who have sustained injuries due to dog bites. As a highly skilled personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we understand the aggravation and distress that comes from dealing with such an ordeal. Not only do victims commonly endure physical pain, but they may also face emotional trauma and significant medical expenses.

Understanding what pertains to a dog bite injury case is crucial for initiating a successful claim. In essence, a person is usually considered legally responsible for damages if their dog injures someone else. This applies whether the incident happened on public property or private property where the victim was lawfully present. Should a negligent pet owner fail in their duty of care by letting their dog harm another individual, they can be held legally liable.

A handful of key factors come into play when evaluating each unique case:

● The severity of your injuries: Dog bites can result in various types of injuries including puncture wounds, lacerations, broken bones or even tragic fatalities.

● Proof of negligence: To win your case successfully, you’ll need strong proof showing that the owner’s negligence resulted in the attack.

● Previous bad behavior: Has this particular dog been hostile before? Evidence of any previous incidents can become very powerful evidence.

● Owned vs stray dogs: Most laws don’t apply for attacks by stray dogs because there’s no individual or entity responsible for their conduct.

Remember that certain conditions may impact your capability to sue for an injury inflicted by a canine. These include instances where a person teases, provokes or torments the animal leading up to the event.

While our legal team manages all types of personal injury cases across Illinois state lines here at Carlson Bier, we harbor extensive experience advocating specifically for victims suffering from dog bite injuries. We will tirelessly work alongside you and leave no stone unturned as we delve into uncovering essential evidence regarding your circumstances.

One thing always remains certain when considering legal representation for your personal injury case: time is of the essence. Illinois law imposes specific time restrictions, known as statutes of limitations, within which you must file a lawsuit. That’s why we urge prospective clients to act swiftly in seeking our services.

At Carlson Bier, we promise utmost dedication towards realizing maximum recovery under Illinois law for individuals impacted by dog bite injuries. Our vigilant approach in handling these cases has consistently demonstrated positive outcomes with fair and full compensation packages covering medical bills, pain and suffering, lost earning potential and more.

Finalizing your decision on retaining an attorney can be daunting. We empathize fully with those experiencing such turbulent times – it’s why our initial consultations carry no charges. You’ll get to discuss your situation with one of our experienced lawyers who will guide you towards understanding your rights without any financial obligation.

Don’t let this ordeal control you – take back the reins today, by securing the professional support that Carlson Bier offers unreservedly to victims dealing with dog bite injuries. Through choosing us to represent you legally would position yourself firmly at an advantage against negligent pet owners seeking to rid themselves from just consequence.

Invite hope back into your life now by taking that critical next step forward. Click on the button below and discover how much your case could potentially be worth under Illinois law in a totally free assessment from us at Carlson Bier – advisors you can trust implicitly during these challenging circumstances.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Knoxville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Knoxville

Areas of Practice in Knoxville

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing professional legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending experienced legal support for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending expert legal guidance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Slip Accidents

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents get reasonable recompense for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Delivering professional legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to ensuring professional legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Expert in assisting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​