Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Knoxville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Sustaining spinal cord injuries can be a life-altering event, decimating your overall quality of life. Under such circumstances, seeking legal recourse is an essential step towards ensuring medical expenses and recovery needs are met. Carlson Bier in Illinois stands firm as your trusted ally for these precise battles. Possessing exceptional knowledge on Spinal Cord Injuries law issues, the team at Carlson Bier offers unparalleled expertise to navigate you through complex legal pathways skillfully and bring justice home.

Accident victims appreciate our lawyers’ proactive communication approach and their relentless commitment to achieve substantial compensation worthy of lost wages, pain, suffering or any other damages that result from accidents leading to Spinal Cord Injuries. At a trying time when victims grapple with painful rehabilitation processes and growing hospital bills – the proficient lawyers at Carlson Bier spare no effort in championing your cause effectively.

Protection beyond precedents – that’s what we pledge at Carlson Bier for all individuals affected by spinal cord injuries. For steadfast representation backed by acclaimed competence choose us as your preferential option on Spinal Cord Injuries lawsuits.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Knoxville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a focused expertise on Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), serving across Illinois to bring you the reliable counsel and aggressive representation that your case demands. As accident and injury attorneys who have dedicated our careers to this complex field, we understand the devastating effects an SCI can have not only physically but also financially and emotionally.

Spinal cord injuries are a serious type of trauma that result from blow or damage to the spine. The impact often leads to disrupted signals between your brain and body, which depending on the severity can cause partial or total loss of motor control and sensation also known as paralysis. According to data from the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC), there are approximately 17,700 new spinal cord injury cases each year in the United States alone.

When it comes to these injuries they typically fall into two categories: complete and incomplete. A ‘Complete’ SCI entails total lack of sensory and motor function below the level of injury; whereas an ‘Incomplete’ SCI implies some degree of ability to convey messages still exists between the brain and body parts controlled by affected areas of the spine.

• Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Loss of all feeling and voluntary muscle control below site of injury

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Partial preservation of neural communication posts incident

In dealing with such cases extensively, we at Carlson Bier acknowledge that these can arise from a range of unfortunate circumstances from unavoidable accidents to regrettable acts like negligence or mistreatment. Whether it’s road mishaps, workplace hazards, sports activity disasters or even medical malpractice – nobody is truly immune.

One thing common across all instances though is that victims invariably deserve justice for their plight along with rightful compensation so as restore normalcy at best possible scale. This kindles our resolve as firm comprising experienced lawyers specializing in pursuing comprehensive recovery in spinal cord injury litigation.

• Specialized Legal Help for all causes of Spinal Cord Injuries

• Aggressive Representation for rightful compensation

Throughout the process, our commitment remains to not just winning your case but also simplifying legals around it for you. Our priority is to ensure you understand everything about your rights and options in terms that are easy to comprehend. We believe knowledge is one’s best defense; hence wish to arm our clients with same.

As expert spinal cord injury attorneys, we bring extensive resources and invaluable experience dealing with insurance companies, medical experts, rehabilitation specialists among others – whose inputs can significantly boost the value of your claim.

Your journey towards restitution shouldn’t be navigated alone. At Carlson Bier, we offer comprehensive legal support for your case based on a deep-seated understanding of Illinois law and precedent in regards to personal injury involving spinal cord trauma.

Our team at Carlson Bier stands ready, awaiting an opportunity to extend the due diligence requisite prior proceeding onto litigation phase. Each personal injury account requires custom strategy mapped by lawyers of caliber such as ours at Carlson Bier who discern damages accurately and strategize most pragmatic approach toward maximum recovery possible under Illinois law.

In conclusion, when someone else’s negligence or faulty conduct has caused harm – especially one as serious as a spinal cord injury – you’re entitled more than ever before towards seeking justice and full financial recompense for extent of ordeal undergone in healing physically and mentally while fostering independence anew.

With offices throughout Illinois, our exceptional Carlson Bier attorney team is vested determinedly toward each client’s success story-in-the-making even amid adversity foisted upon them untimely via unforeseen incidents leading onto fatal injuries bearing potential life scenarios unwarranted.

Curious how much worth could your individual claim potentially clinch? We invite you explore right away clicking below enabling us examine circumstances plus determine equity appropriate! Underlying every victim’s disarray symptomatic post backbone impairment lies zeal unabating brought forth by counselors here at Carlson Bier eagerly contending for your vindication.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Knoxville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Knoxville

Areas of Practice in Knoxville

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying expert legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing expert legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Accident

Delivering specialist legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to delivering specialized legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer