...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in La Harpe

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to securing legal representation within La Harpe for dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier personifies expertise and trust. With a profound understanding of Chicago’s rigorous personal injury laws, our firm specializes in serving victims of canine onsets through diligent advocacy. We’re committed to helping you navigate the complex aftermath; investigating your case extensively, negotiating with insurance companies, or even taking your case to trial if necessary. Proven success highlights our record as relentless defenders for victims against negligible pet owners who fail to adhere to leash laws or regulating potentially dangerous breeds within Illinois’ guidelines. Furthermore, we pride ourselves in our personalized approach- treating each client with empathy and undivided attention, ensuring every victim gets their rightful compensation without delays or undue hassles. So remember, when bitten by adversity in La Harpe turn towards Carlson Bier’s proficient attorneys focused exclusively on dog bite cases – an ideal combination of local insight and wide-ranging proficiency handling personal injury lawsuits across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in La Harpe Illinois

Carlson Bier, a reputable personal injury law firm based in Illinois, proudly upholds an enduring commitment to the rights of victims who have suffered due to dog bite injuries. In an effort to offer premium services and extend our professional reach, we invite you on this journey towards gaining critical knowledge pertaining to dog bite injuries.

In many cases, unknowingly or otherwise, owners fail to adhere to stringent leash laws resulting in their pets inflicting harm on others. It’s essential for victims subjected to such incidents to understand that they are entitled by law to seek restitution. Dog bite injuries can range from minor scratches and abrasions to more severe conditions including deep lacerations or puncture wounds; some even necessitating plastic surgery as part of treatment and recovery.

Taking swift action after being bitten by a dog is vital. Here are key steps one should undertake:

– Seek immediate medical attention: This step goes without saying where serious injuries are involved but it’s equally important for seemingly minor cases as well.

– Document your injuries: Photographic evidence drastically improves your chances of winning compensation during litigation.

– Report the incident: Do not hesitate when reporting such incidents to your local animal control authorities.

– Consult a lawyer: Upon stabilization of your condition, promptly consult with Carlson Bier’s experienced injury attorneys in order for us help protect your legal interests effectively.

This would be an opportune moment to emphasize that obtaining professional counsel like ours substantially increases potential compensation amounts due since each case comes complete with its own set of complexities demanding careful handling and representation.

In-depth understanding forms the backbone of any successful claim filed under Illinois’ comprehensive Animal Control Act which protects victims aggrieved by dogs unleashed recklessly by owners upon public spaces. Painstaking emphasis is placed on owner responsibilities towards preventing such recurring offenses viz controlling their pet’s behaviors so as not causing any kind of undue mental trauma or physical disfigurement onto unsuspecting individuals especially children who might be particularly susceptible to these attacks.

As a steadfast provider of legal support, Carlson Bier values the merit behind educating and empowering those sustaining dog bite injuries. Recognize that your pain and suffering bear considerable weight– both in the courtroom and outside it–and deserve adequate compensation. When you team up with our law firm, we pledge not only ensuring you receive rightful monetary damages but also making sure all involved parties adhere strictly to laws dedicated towards reducing such untoward incidents within our communities.

While dogs are widely regarded as man’s best friend, their unpredictability can sometimes lead to serious injuries. Such situations necessitate professional legal help provided by seasoned lawyers like ours at Carlson Bier who understand well how ever-evolving laws around personal injury cases function while offering competent advice modulated in tandem with Illinois’ specific jurisdictional statutes.

Prepare yourself for any potential pitfalls that might come your way during the pursuit of justice after an unfortunate canine attack occurrence–rest easy knowing that our devoted attorneys stand ready to fight earnestly for you; maneuvering adeptly around intricacies underpinning clauses contained within the Animal Control Act (ACA) or analyzing minutely details surrounding rules governing private insurance payouts providing for medical expenses arising from resultant post-attack treatments undergone by victims.

Our benefaction extends beyond in-court presentation services alone to assisting clients facing daunting uncertainty about their futures overcoming difficulties incurred during these troubling times due to aberrant animal behavior exhibited previously thought-of harmless pets belonging either neighbors or casual acquaintances alike.

Facing injuries caused by dog bites doesn’t have to be an arduous journey when equipped with copious knowledge and backed by robust representation offered faithfully here at Carlson Bier—your trusted ally advocating tirelessly on behalf of underrepresented victims falling prey tragically through no fault of their own whatsoever thus rendering them unable seeking justifiable amends legally owed unto them.

We invite you now, take dynamic control over your present circumstances instead succumbing fearfully feeling defeated even before justice had a fair chance to prevail. To get started, simply click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth—it’s time you claimed back what is rightfully yours; we at Carlson Bier are here to assist every step of the way.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For La Harpe Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in La Harpe

Areas of Practice in La Harpe

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying professional legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing expert legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Collisions: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents secure appropriate payout for harms and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Accident

Ensuring adept legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on delivering expert legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Focused on advocating for clients with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​