Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in La Moille

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

In La Moille, the trauma from dog bite injuries can be intricate and require acute legal acumen. Carlson Bier shines brightly in handling these complex cases to defend your rights. Unsurpassed in expertise, our proficient team specializes exclusively in personal injury litigation including dog bite incidents, amassing a track record of substantial settlements throughout Illinois. At Carlson Bier, our primary concern is safeguarding clients’ freedom during unsettling times where suffering due to a traumatic dog bite incident ascends beyond physical pain into emotional distress and financial concerns. Leveraging an abundance of experience with Illinois laws surrounding animal attacks, we vigorously champion for just compensation while offering guidance with empathy you find comforting preliminary through post-trial procedures. Trustworthiness anchors our practice; personalized attention underscores every Carlson Bier interaction—enhancing favorable outcomes on behalf of those we serve diligently. Opt for experienced representation like ours — choose wisely by letting the proven attorneys at the Carlson Bier law firm handle your case meticulously: advocating fervently when lives are deeply impacted by canine-inflicted harm.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in La Moille Illinois

At Carlson Bier, one of our primary areas of focus is representing the rights of victims who’ve suffered dog bite injuries. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we understand just how traumatic these incidents can be. A pet that you’ve approached with trust can unflinchingly harm you, leading to serious, and sometimes life-altering consequences. Often unseen are the distressing psychological impacts a victim may endure long after their physical wounds have healed.

Dog bites may incur significant medical bills from emergency room visits, surgeries or ongoing care needed for wound rehabilitation. Prevention of infection might require costly medication while possible scarring could necessitate cosmetic surgery. Furthermore, the victim could suffer lost wages due to time off work for recovery. In some regrettable scenarios, there may even be life-changing alterations to routine and capacity to function as per normal trajectory prior to the incident.

As your legal advocates at Carlson Bier, we want you to know that when a need arises for legal recourse post such an unfortunate event, we are well equipped to extend necessary support during this uncertain and likely challenging period. It’s worth highlighting key aspects our proficient team will rigorously examine:

• The Owner’s Liability: We’ll delve into all relevant details systematically – has the dog shown signs of aggression in the past? Was it kept unrestrained?

• Severity and Nature of Your Injuries: Not only physical damage but also resulting emotional trauma plays a critical role in determining compensation.

• Financial Impact: This includes an assessment not just immediate accruing expenses but future economic implications as well.

Selecting appropriate professional counsel following a dog bite incidence is crucial hence comprehensive understanding related laws and regulations unique specific geographic locations becomes vital especially state legislature distinguishes rules between different municipalities within its borders basis leash laws or damaging animal legislatures present therein.

Illinois residents would notably benefit from understanding that under Illinois law according to Animal Control Act Section 2.16b if an individual is bitten by an animal they can hold the owner legally responsible for damages caused by the dog or other animals. Essentially this makes Illinois what’s often referred to as a “strict liability” state in terms of dog bites, which simplifies proving owner responsibility.

However, complexities might arise if it’s deemed that the victim provoked the attack. Therefore, one should be cognizant that any perceived provocation on part of the victim could potentially affect their claim so having expert legal representation by your side becomes even more consequential in such instances.

At Carlson Bier, we thoroughly understand both physical and psychological implications following a vicious dog attack. With our robust experience and extensive knowledge base about specific regulations applicable within Illinois on these matters has solidly positioned us as a leading personal injury law group specializing in dog bite incidents helping victims seamlessly navigate through complicated legal landscapes ensuring fair redressal measures are afforded to them.

Each minute detail can impact your case significantly hence at Carlson Bier we carefully review every facet diligently following through obtaining rightful compensation soothing burdens you’re already battling post such a startling ordeal.

As you mull over your potential legal options after suffering from a distressing event like this reach out to our office right away. Every member of our team at Carlson Bier is committed to providing exceptional client-centric service working tirelessly to ensure peace of mind coupled with required systemized support suited specifically tailored around unique dynamics each case presents itself with.

Remember – navigating through adjusting life post a traumatic incident is daunting enough without worrying about legal intricacies along with financial strain looming overhead concurrently. Trust us at Carlson Bier to guide you until justice gets served rightly establishing restorative balance back into your world thereby returning normalcy bit-by-bit sooner rather than later.

We invite you now to take action towards reclaiming control over your situation click on the button below assess how much might rightfully deserve as compensation associated with this unfortunate incident so thereby mitigate some measure suffering endured empowering you to move forward confidently.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For La Moille Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in La Moille

Areas of Practice in La Moille

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending adept legal advice for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing specialist legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, supplying skilled legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Stumble Occurrences

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Accident

Delivering specialist legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in providing professional legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Expert in representing clients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer