...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lacon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you fall victim to a dog bite injury in Lacon, it is pivotal that your legal representation clinches the justice and compensation you are due. Carlson Bier stands as an esteemed personal injury law firm within Illinois, specializing in handling cases related to Dog Bite Injuries. Our experienced attorneys from Carlson Bier understand the intricate complexities of Illinois Dog Bite Laws providing adept assistance through every step of legal proceedings. We utilize our broad knowledge base and persuasive negotiation skills striving for maximum settlements for our clients. At Carlson Bier, we believe in fostering clients’ confidence throughout their case by ensuring open communication channels with detailed updates on case progressions. As your trusted ally against accountable parties often backed by powerful insurance companies, we are uncompromising in standing up against injustice or bureaucracy that hampers recovery rights legally granted to dog-bite victims under Illinois state law guidelines. Trust us – at Carlson Bier – taking assertive action towards deserved redressal following a distressful canine attack incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lacon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in advocating for victims of personal injury cases, providing trusted and legal expertise across Illinois. Particular to our area of focus are incidents involving Dog Bite Injuries – a distressing and often traumatic experience that may result in suffering both physical injuries and emotional trauma.

As one navigates through the aftermath of a dog bite incident, it is vital to understand the laws applicable within Illinois jurisdiction. Illinois’ Animal Control Act holds the animal’s owner strictly liable for any harm or damages their pet might cause, provided the victim was conducting themselves peaceably and did not provoke the attack. This makes Illinois a ‘strict liability’ state where evidently establishing proof falls on demonstrating that you were indeed bitten by an identifiable dog without incitement.

Key aspects you need to be mindful of include:

• Ensuring immediate medical attention post-injury: The primary concern should always be your health.

• Reporting the incident promptly: To local law enforcement or animal control officials – this creates an official record.

• Gathering Evidence: Photos of injuries, location (if possible), witness information, etc., can bolster your case down-the-line.

In understanding how these instances are adjudicated, it becomes evident that determining fault isn’t about assigning blame on the canine but pinpointing responsibility to its owner. This means any ensuing lawsuits would be against owners who failed in their duty to prevent their pets from causing harm rather than being directed towards animals.

The legal landscape pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries is intricate with many a variable at play such as previous aggresive behavior records of dogs involved or adherence of leash laws. Navigating through this demands expertise that only experienced personal injury lawyers like us possess at Carlson Bier can provide. We work diligently ensuring those negligent accountable for your suffering are brought before justice while securing compensation due under provincial and federal laws including coverages such as:

• Medical bills arising from rabies shots, sutures, surgeries or any treatment to mend physical injuries caused

• Emotional distress including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

• Lost wages due to injury time-off from work

At Carlson Bier, we assure comprehensive assistance right from the initial reporting stage until successful case closure, deploying decades of experience in delivering justice for clients. We understand that dealing with a traumatic incident is challenging enough without having the added worry of legal procedures and confusion. Trust us when we assure you – you aren’t going through this alone.

Our firm has established its reputable presence within Illinois; our offices based strategically ensuring access for all our clients spread across the state. When choosing your personal injury attorney, it’s essential to ensure they possess not just astute knowledge about specific issues such as Dog Bite Injuries but are also well versed with peculiarities concerning local laws and regulations pertinent to their physical locations.

Remember, every accident and consequent legal action come encumbered with an inherent uncertainty depending on numerous unique factors individual to every case. Take advantage of free consultation we offer where dedicated experts at Carlson Bier evaluate each situation tailoring strategic guidance aligning best with your particular circumstances.

Don’t leave these crucial decisions veiled under doubt; instead click the button below – a step taking you closer to unveiling how much your case could potentially be worth. Let’s put things into motion for adequately availing appropriate compensation suiting rightfully towards your complete recovery journey!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lacon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lacon

Areas of Practice in Lacon

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering specialist legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Injuries

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Harms

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Focused on assisting sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring expert legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Committed to providing professional legal representation for persons suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to assisting patients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​