FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Lacon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the complexities of Medical Malpractice cases requires expertise, sensitivity, and a commitment to justice. At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact these situations can have on victims in Lacon and are prepared to fight tirelessly for your rights. Our team has an extensive track record of successfully litigating medical malpractice claims; real-world experience that results in practical insights and winning strategies for our clients. As dedicated attorneys, we examine all aspects of your case, ensuring that negligence is exposed with indisputable evidence. The combination of our legal acumen with relentless determination sets us apart as a trusted ally in confronting those responsible for professional irresponsibility or health care inadequacies. When you retain Carlson Bier’s services, you’re not just gaining an attorney—you’re garnering an advocate committed solely to seeking justice on your behalf within Illinois law parameters regarding medical malpractice issues whenever they arise regardless of location specifics.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Lacon Illinois

Carlson Bier is a dedicated personal injury attorney firm based in Illinois, with a focused specialization in medical malpractice cases. Our team is committed to assisting individuals who have suffered due to medical negligence or incompetence, advocating for rightful compensation and justice on their behalf.

Medical malpractice occurs when the standard of care expected from a healthcare provider has been breached, causing harm or injury to a patient. This deviation from the standard can arise in numerous ways including misdiagnosis, surgical errors, medication mistakes, insufficient follow-up care and failing to recognize symptoms. These errors may lead not only to physical pain and suffering but also emotional distress and financial challenges – areas where Carlson Bier steps in to ensure victims are aptly compensated.

• Misdiagnosis: These cases involve situations where healthcare professionals incorrectly diagnose a condition or fail to diagnose it at all. A delayed diagnosis can result in unnecessary treatments or a reduction in recovery chance.

• Surgical Errors: Despite rigorous checks and protocols, surgeons occasionally make mistakes that can lead to severe consequences such as operating on the wrong patient or part of the body, leaving surgical equipment inside patients or inflicting nerve damages during surgery.

• Medication Mistakes: Wrong prescription could result from mistaken drug administration, incorrect dosages dispensed or prescribed medicines incompatible with pre-existing conditions of patients.

Our firm represents clients keeping these concerns central – guiding them through complex litigation processes using careful strategy tailored according to individual implications. Carlson Bier prides itself on its deep understanding of medical malpractice law combined with sharp negotiation skills– both crucial for achieving favorable outcomes for our clients.

One unique element about us is extraordinary client support we provide throughout the procedure; treating each case uniquely rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach often adopted by other attorneys. At Carlson Bier we understand that pursuing legal recourse after experiencing medical malpractice can feel stressful and even overwhelming particularly against well-represented hospitals or physicians.

Don’t worry when we take on your case. Our exhaustive resources and wide network of medical experts are available to analyze the aspects of your situation carefully, determining potential violations in standard patient cares leading to negligence. We ensure a clear presentation of these findings backed by credible scientifically validated evidence if heading towards trial.

Entering a lawsuit may seem daunting considering its unsettling implications, but keep in mind – this attempt can safeguard future patients from similar experiences while securing deserved compensation for you. It insists healthcare providers maintain high standards keeping public interests at heart, holding them accountable for their actions.

Over the years Carlson Bier has earned an illustrious standing due to relentless dedication in procuring settlements desired by clients. While each case is truly different and any law firm guaranteeing specific results might be misleading; our solid track record undoubtedly signifies strong capabilities possessed by our personal injury attorneys.

To estimate potential worth attached to your specific case let Carlson Bier assist you now; don’t delay exposing negligent parties causing such distress whilst hurting innocent lives simultaneously. Commitment and passion highlight what drives us leading every effort undertaken by our team- advocating tirelessly protecting victims affected by medical malpractice.

Click on the button below – initiate conversation allowing professional attorneys assisting you further understanding possibilities opening up with seeking legal redressal against those responsible for harming important life aspects lately; potentially recovering what’s rightfully yours from them without any more undue disturbances causing significant strains already endured by you during this trying phase! Be assured that Carlson Bier stands firmly beside you throughout this pivotal journey towards claiming reparations extracting maximal benefits through Illinois’ complex yet favorably designed legal parameters.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lacon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Lacon

Areas of Practice in Lacon

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering expert legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Offering expert legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal guidance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Stumble Accidents

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to helping individuals of car accidents receive equitable settlement for injuries and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Accident

Extending adept legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Focused on providing specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​