FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Ladd

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re a victim of a bicycle accident, securing the assurance of competent and dedicated legal representation is paramount. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm in Illinois, specializes in tackling such cases with unrivaled expertise and passion for justice. Our team of seasoned attorneys understands not only the immense strain these incidents place on victims’ lives but also the varying complexities that permeate Bicycle Accidents Law. With our trusted professionals by your side, you can feel secure knowing that we will vigorously advocate for your rights while delivering bespoke solutions designed to fit your specific needs. We have commendable experience serving clients across different regions including Ladd; ensuring adherence to all regional regulations applicable during each step towards obtaining justice for our clients is part of what sets us apart as reliable attorneys at law within this domain. Choose Carlson Bier today; because when it comes to seeking efficient resolution after bike mishaps – every detail matters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Ladd Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing victims of personal injury, with a keen focus on accidents involving bicycles. As a highly esteemed Illinois-based law firm, our expertise and unwavering commitment to justice have made evident differences in the lives of numerous victims who had their lives suddenly upheaved by an unforeseen accident. Particularly within the realm of bicycle-related incidents, we offer comprehensive legal support that surpasses regular expectations.

The anatomy of bicycle accidents encompasses facets that might not be immediately apparent to non-legal personnel. Primarily, bicyclist rights are typically ignored or misconstrued due to widespread social ignorance regarding these aspects. This is further integrity-compromised through potential hit-and-run occurrences wherein culprits evade responsibility. With Carlson Bier by your side though, rest assured that your rights will be fiercely protected.

Knowing what to remember after experiencing a bicycle accident can drastically influence case outcomes:

• Always remain at the scene until law enforcement arrives

• Exchange information with all involved parties

• Document everything; Take pictures if possible

• Seek out eyewitness accounts for corroboration

• Never negotiate without lawyer consultation

Understanding how insurance companies operate is paramount, as they often display reluctance in settling claims satisfactorily – especially ones concerning personal injuries. Insurance providers tend to exploit loopholes and attempt minimizing payouts via trivializing injuries sustained or disputing fault liability. At Carlson Bier, we’ll ensure that your interests aren’t compromised owing to such underhanded tactics.

Illinois state laws contribute vital factors influencing successful claim resolutions achieved post-bicycle accidents. For instance:

-Sec 11-1502 stipulates that cyclists possess similar roadway rights existing for motorists.

-Sec 5/11-703 demands vehicles overtaking bicycles maintain minimum three-feet lateral clearance.

-Sec 5/11-907 expands yielding rules towards bicyclists when motorists take right turns while sharing lanes.

Being versed in state laws not only assists in validating your claim but it also fortifies you against unlawful exploitation, making our legal expertise indispensable.

Often cycling accidents occur due to driver negligence: abrupt turns, speeding or drunk driving etc. However, situations might arise where the cyclist could be at fault too (like disregard for traffic signals or wearing insufficient visibility gear). It’s crucial to discern that if a plaintiff is found less than 50% at fault, they’re still eligible for proportional damage compensation per Illinois liability laws.

Counsel from Carlson Bier ensures fair proceedings regardless of complexity intrinsic within individual cases; with us looking out for your interests, every critical angle will be scrupulously assessed and used beneficially towards securing deserved compensations.

Investing unwavering efforts into battling personal injury complexities is Carlton Bier’s standing ethos — transposing this further extends particular proficiency over bicycle accident-related cases across Illinois [please note we are not situated in Ladd]. Being aware of intricacies linked to bicycle acccidents goes the extra mile in preparing prospective litigants about situational outcomes post such unfortunate occurrences. And remember: never let daunting legal procedures deter rightful justice pursuit—this journey isn’t traversed alone when you’ve got trusted companions like Carlson Bier upholding your case till its successful resolution.

In evaluating how much your case might potentially be worth, several considerations lie in place: Medical expenses incurred (including potential future treatment costs), lost earnings during recovery periods, emotional distress upheld, overall pain and suffering scale and more. Making sense of these various facets without qualified help proves intimidating —But with our law office by your side? It becomes a task conquered smoothly and efficiently.

Why settle for inexpert advice when you can have seasoned professionals one click away? We encourage you to reach out today through clicking on the button provided below –a move enabling prompt insight valuation concerning your unique case worth while illuminating roadmaps geared towards just settlements negotiated adeptly. Let Carlson Bier reaffirm trust you’ve placed in legal proceedings – your pursuit for justice starts here.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ladd Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Ladd

Areas of Practice in Ladd

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending adept legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing expert legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Supplying legal help for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents get equitable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing specialist legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to offering specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Fatality

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Expert in defending individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​