Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lake Bluff

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Secure justice and compensation with Carlson Bier – your trusted partner in cases involving dog bite injuries. Our seasoned attorneys, experts within the realm of Illinois law, are well-equipped to handle a myriad of complexities that such incidents often present. With an unwavering commitment to defend one’s rights, we tirelessly work towards securing the maximum possible monetary recovery for our clients hurt by canines; serving Lake Bluff citizens with incisive legal insights and practical remedies. As hardened negotiators and dynamic litigators at courtrooms or mediation tables alike, we bring aboard broad experience across diverse personal injury claims related specifically to animal-inflicted harm. Opting for any random counsel won’t suffice when stakes involve debilitating aftermaths of ravaging dog bites which may lead to relentless physical pain or emotional trauma; you need absolute assurance – You deserve Carlson Bier! Grappling with aggressive insurance companies feels daunting enough without navigating intricate legal rules so empower yourself today; reach out for assistance from acclaimed professionals who prioritize your best interests – Team up with Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lake Bluff Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our unwavering commitment to defend and advocate for victims of personal injury. We possess a particularly impressive track record in cases involving dog bite injuries. Such injuries can be traumatic, not just physically but also emotionally, disrupting the normal rhythm of your life in considerable ways. When you’re burdened with medical bills, pain, possible infection risk resulting from the bites or even an inability to return to work due to trauma or associated injury effects, we step in with fierce representation.

Understanding dog bite laws in Illinois is crucial if you’ve been a victim of such an incident. Under the state’s Animal Control Act, owners are held responsible for their animal’s behavior provided that:

• The person bitten was conducting themselves peaceably

• The person bitten was permitted to be on the premises where they were bitten.

Additionally, Illinois operates under ‘strict liability,’ meaning even if a dog has no history of aggressive behavior its owner may still be held liable for any bitings it perpetrates.

Suffering a dog bite provides grounds for claiming legal compensations covering various aspects such as:

• Medical bills incurred directly due to the bite

• Cost of future medical care like plastic surgery or emotional therapy

• Lost wages from time away from work recovering

• Pain and suffering endured post-incident

It must be noted that evidentiary requirements necessitate thorough documentation when seeking compensation after enduring a dog bite. This includes:

• Documented proof of ownership – showing who currently owns or harbors the involved canine at their property.

• Evidence detailing circumstances around your attack – this could include witness testimonies substantiating your claims beyond doubt.

• Properly maintained and chronologically arranged medical records corroborate how substantial your damages might have been thanks to undesired canine aggression.

These points are extremely valuable facets qualifying you for maximum possible settlement value; however, structuring these into an irrefutable legal argument may require assistance from experienced dog bite attorneys.

That’s where Carlson Bier’s prowess comes in. Our team of dedicated, seasoned attorneys are well-versed with the intricate nuances propelling a successful lawsuit. We don’t just represent you legally; we empathize with your plight and commit to securing financial compensation that aligns rightfully with the trauma endured.

Our extensive background handling personal injury lawsuits including scores of successful settlements for victims bitten by dogs exemplifies our competence in this space. Above all, we subscribe to an ethos rooted within compassion, professionalism, and relentless pursuit for justice – translating into tangible results benefiting our clientele.

We believe in providing services accessible to everyone which is why we follow a contingency basis policy for our fee structure – meaning if you don’t win, you pay nothing. Our fee is settled as a fair percentage only after your case has been successfully resolved and never out-of-pocket upfront.

Lastly remember, Illinois law prohibits personal injury attorney groups like us from advertising having offices within regions they physically do not exist. As Illinois-based attorneys dealing extensively in matters pertaining to dog bites injuries across the state including Lake Bluff region – we emphasize on stating categorically that although we have amicably resolved numerous cases hailing from there due to amplified client trust level towards Carlson Bier Group over many decades; it does not translate into implying existence of a physical office within Lake Buff locale per se.

The pathway towards justice doesn’t need to be walked alone. Allow the relentless advocates at Carlson Bier guide you through these challenging times with conviction and expertise every step of the way. To learn more about how much your case might be worth under the comprehensive supervision of trusted counsel at Carlson Bier, click on the button below. Take the first step forward today by finding out how much your case could potentially be worth—we look forward helping navigate your path towards justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Bluff Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lake Bluff

Areas of Practice in Lake Bluff

Bicycle Incidents

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing expert legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Negligence

Offering expert legal representation for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Mishaps

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on helping victims of car accidents secure equitable recompense for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Offering professional legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Focused on offering specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to defending individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer