FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Lake Bluff

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate slip and fall accidents occur in Lake Bluff, the Carlson Bier law firm stands ready to provide invaluable legal representation. Boasting an exceptional track record in dealing with such cases, we champion for maximum compensation for accident victims. Our well-versed attorneys combine comprehensive knowledge of Illinois personal injury law and meticulous attention to detail to present strong arguments tailored uniquely for each case. Leading insurance companies recognize our resolute commitment, adding leverage during negotiations aimed at securing fair compensations. At Carlson Bier, we humbly understand the physical and emotional burdens caused by a slip or fall incidents; hence, we strive diligently on behalf of our deserving clients easing their challenging journey toward just reparation. With us acting as responsible legal shields and advocates against formidable oppositions such as big insurance firms who often battle against rightful claims makes us a trusted resource in this arena across Illinois especially when considering Slip And Fall Accidents lawyers.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Lake Bluff Illinois

In the realm of personal injury law, one type of case that causes much distress and harm to victims are Slip and Fall Accidents. We at Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, strive towards aiding victims in assessing their rights and obtaining justice they rightfully deserve. A Slip and Fall Accident refers to any situation where a person slips or trips followed by a fall on someone else’s property resulting in an injury. These accidents can occur anywhere from shopping malls, grocery stores, restaurants, office buildings to apartment complexes.

Understanding the nuances associated with these cases is crucial for guiding you through your legal journey. When engaging with such situations, it’s important to realize that property owners possess a duty of care towards visitors. This mandate implies that as proprietors of a location – whether residential or commercial – they must ensure reasonable safety parameters are met preventing slip and fall accidents.

Various factors could be responsible for these unwanted incidents such as poorly maintained sidewalks or parking lots; negligent handling of wet floors particularly around swimming pools or following cleaning activities; lackadaisical attitude towards icy walkways during winter season; inadequately lit staircases yielding unclear views among others.

Of equal importance is becoming aware about the criterion that helps establish responsibility when it comes to slip and fall accidents under Illinois law:

• The existence of hazardous conditions has been controlled by the owner.

• The proprietor was aware about it yet consciously chose not to address them

• Hazardous condition prevailed for certain period within which choosing caution would have possible quite easily

Evidence plays a significant role too while dealing with these encumbrances so keeping photographic proof handy like pictures capturing bad lighting areas or broken stairs along with medical reports documenting injuries owing to falls become definitive contributors strengthening your case immensely.

However, achieving success warrants proving laxity on part of entity responsible which demands comprehensive knowledge regarding local laws. Underpinning this challenge requires diligence coupled with unyielding perseverance elements that form the very core of our professional ethos.

Being equipped with years of intense experience, we at Carlson Bier are thoroughly proficient navigating through these legal intricacies ensuring your journey remains as uncomplicated and successful as possible. Our undying commitment to safeguarding victims’ rights coupled with attention to minute details has been pivotal in earning us a strong reputation making us stand out in Illinois’s personal injury landscape.

In addition, we value the uniqueness associated with each case hence adopt customized strategies that align precisely with individual needs. Above all, we resonate strongly with our clients providing them unhindered support from initial consultation till concluding verdict ensuring their best interests never go unheeded.

To end, it is worth remembering slip and fall accidents can manifest unabridged complexities often requiring an astute understanding of local laws for a favorable outcome. At Carlson Bier, we pledge unwavering dedication along every step of this journey assuring familiarity breeds comfort throughout its course.

To solidify this promise, we invite you now to venture into calculating what your case could be potentially worth by clicking on the button below – it is just a simple click towards realigning justice in your favor as swiftly and seamlessly as possible because at Carlson Bier, your cause becomes ours reflecting the best within us invariably!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Bluff Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lake Bluff

Areas of Practice in Lake Bluff

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing expert legal support for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering expert legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Abuse

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Fall Occurrences

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Incidents

Committed to providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in providing specialized legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440