FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Lake Bluff

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to providing sound legal counsel and representation for spinal cord injuries, look no further than Carlson Bier. This premier Illinois law firm excels at offering knowledgeable guidance and relentless advocacy in complex spinal cord injury cases. Committed to fighting with passion and professionalism, their mission is not simply winning a case but helping clients reclaim their lives after an unfortunate accident. The attorneys at Carlson Bier have substantial experience navigating the intricacies of personal injury law, especially those surrounding devastating spinal traumas that disrupt both physical health and mental well-being. They genuinely empathize with the pain of victims who constantly struggle against visible incapacitation or unseen cognitive disorders following a serious spine injury. Demonstrating deep familiarity with Illinois legislation ensures they are pinpoint accurate in crafting compelling arguments aimed at securing optimal compensation packages from responsible parties or insurance entities.

Despite where you reside even if it’s Lake Bluff; distance won’t limit your access to exceptional legal services provided by Carlson Bier – your best consideration for handling any Spinal Cord Injuries related lawsuit diligently while preserving your dignity throughout the process.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Lake Bluff Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing clients who have suffered spinal cord injuries. Previously healthy individuals, now dealing with the aftermath of life-altering accidents; your circumstance is not just another case to us, but an opportunity to bring justice and healing back into your world. It’s our commitment at Carlson Bier to ensure that you understand key aspects involved in a spinal cord injury claim.

Spinal cord injuries are damages affecting the nerves transporting signals within elongated sections from the base of the brain down through the spine. These wounds can lead to lifelong complications including paralysis, loss of sensation or limited mobility. The impairment level highly depends on where along the spinal column or vertebrae damage occurred.

• Cervical spinal cord injuries affect movement and functionality in arms and upper body.

• Thoracic spinal injuries could result in paraplegia influencing legs.

• Lumbar spinal cord impairments often concern hips and lower body parts

• Sacral spinal cord harm might interfere with function within hips, thighs and pelvic organs

In Illinois law, a personal injury lawsuit regarding severe ailments like these needs specific substantiation:

– Existence of Responsibility: The accused party had a duty towards protection or careful conduct; for instance avoiding hazardous maneuvers while driving

– Breach Proven: They did not adhere to this responsibility resulting in an accident

– Direct Linkage: This breach directly led to your injury

– Damage Evidence: You suffered physical financial or emotional losses because of this

Specifically focused on alleviating any further upheaval you face after such incidents, Carlson Bier works relentlessly pursuing rightful compensation you deserve. Whether it means arranging medical record collections or securing expert testimonies validating severity – every detail matters when presenting an undeniable claim.

It’s crucial considering potential long term costs related with traumatic complications arising after serious spinal cord traumas. Medical expenses include emergency treatments followed by sustained rehabilitation therapies over months even years sometimes involving assisted living alterations at home. Income losses owing to an inability or restricted employment capability given reduced functioning, alongside living with pain and emotional strain; everything factors into your deserving claim.

Victims of such incapacitating blows need standing strong by their side well-versed with these complexities of personal injury law in Illinois–and that’s what we at Carlson Bier firmly constitutes. Comprehending extensive aspects regulating our state’s laws relating spinal cord hurt compensation, helps us build resilient representation for fighting in your favor fervently amid all court proceedings.

With us safeguarding your interests you can focus on the most important thing—your recovery! Our proficient team handling intricate negotiations while you devote time into physical mental restoration through appropriate care and therapies provides a comforting relief amidst challenging times.

Through our website, get access to multiple resources providing insightful guidance about maintaining lawful protection after spinal traumatic experiences. Trusted by numerous clients over the years, at Carlson Bier you are more than a case—you are family destined for justice! We invite you now to click on the button below determining potential worth of your unique case.

Finally it is essential mentioning although Carlson Bier diligently offers its valuable service defending rights across various localities throughout Illinois—we do not extend services in Lake Bluff following Illinois practice laws prohibiting legal firms from falsely claiming specific locations unless physically situated there. If you require any help regarding spinal injuries reach out we would be happy to assist within proper territorial jurisdictions we cater to assuring thorough honest help always.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Bluff Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Lake Bluff

Areas of Practice in Lake Bluff

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying specialist legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Providing experienced legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering skilled legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Mishaps

Specialist in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for harms and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Delivering specialist legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Building Incidents

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to assisting clients with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440