FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Lake Catherine

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Representing bicycle accident victims in Lake Catherine, Carlson Bier stands as a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois. Bicycle accidents can result in severe physical harm or even life-altering injuries, and our attorneys understand ​the complexities of these situations thoroughly. We know the laws that govern cyclists’ rights and are dedicated to holding accountable parties responsible. Our legal team boasts a proven track record of vigorously fighting for maximum compensation while providing compassionate counsel when tragedy strikes. While navigating through paperwork and interacting with insurance companies might appear daunting, you don’t have to do it alone; our expert lawyers are at your disposal​ continuously to help secure justice swiftly and smoothly. At the intersection where adept negotiation meets fierce litigation, you’ll find Carlson Bier standing tall for its clients’ rights around Lake Catherine area bike incidents. Choose Carlson Bier- where we peddle perseverance in pursuing premiums for bicyclist’s woes! Experience genuine commitment & relentless pursuit of fairness on your road toward recovery today.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Lake Catherine Illinois

The Carlson Bier attorney group, based in Illinois, is a professional personal injury law firm advocating for victims of accidents nationwide, with a special emphasis on Bicycle Accidents. Our focus is to provide unrivaled legal assistance to those unfortunate enough to be involved in such incidents while we actively work against inequities in the present legal system.

Everyday bicycle riders are at risk of being involved in accidents due to negligent drivers and unsafe conditions – this reality underlines our dedicated service areas. Despite protective measures taken by cyclists; wearing safety helmets, using lights during night rides, or observing traffic regulations, devastating injuries can still occur from collisions with motor vehicles or pedestrians or slip-and-falls due to improper signage of road defects.

As leading advocates within this field of law, Carlson Bier is distinctively suited with experienced and reliable bicycle accident attorneys. We understand the intricate nuances that come into play when dealing with cases arising from cycling mishaps:

• We have extensive knowledge of bike riding laws: Many motorists are unaware that bicyclists have a right to share most roads and they must adhere to rules just like any other vehicle.

• We take helmet laws seriously: Some jurisdictions require cyclists – especially minors – to wear a helmet. If you’re not wearing one during an accident it could potentially distress your claim depending on your location.

• Proving negligence is essential: To win in court after an accident, you must prove the party at fault failed in their obligation of care which led directly or indirectly causing harm.

• Understanding ‘Comparative Negligence’: This implies both parties might share blame for an accident; yet even then the injured party may still recover damages.

Carlson Bier takes into account local governing laws and principles while working relentlessly towards earning justice for clients afflicted by biking setbacks. From preserving evidence post-accident to rebuffing insurance carrier’s attempts at denouncing claims made by victims whose lives have been disrupted due to these regrettable events, our firm’s proficiency is far-reaching.

Moreover, we are aware of the impact such incidents can have on victims – physically as well as emotionally. Common injuries include broken bones, road rash, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain damage and sadly even fatalities in tragic cases. Understanding that your immediate recuperation takes priority, we handle every phase of your claims process with undivided attention on securing maximum compensation for all types of pecuniary hardships including medical bills, diminished earning capacity or lost wage reimbursement.

By delivering tailored solutions designed specifically around circumstances surrounding each client’s case combined with an empathetic approach assures victims that their road towards restitution will be proficiently navigated offering solace amidst setbacks.

It would do true justice if you could visit us directly at one of our physical addresses across Illinois; however don’t dismay if this option isn’t feasible. With digital technology advancements Carlson Bier has taken comprehensive measures to extend our esteemed services virtually ensuring efficient communication regardless of location without compromising any aspect regarding legal counsel provision.

Remember! Each claim is unique and thus it requires a customized evaluation to make sure you get justified compensation – click on the link below to find out what your case could be worth! Let Carlson Bier assist you in exerting your legal rights effectively transforming adversity into triumph by guiding you every step of way during such challenging times.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Catherine Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lake Catherine

Areas of Practice in Lake Catherine

Bike Incidents

Expert in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing expert legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, providing skilled legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Injuries

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents secure appropriate settlement for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Crash

Delivering experienced legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Focused on delivering dedicated legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​