FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lake in the Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffered a dog bite injury in Lake in the Hills? You need legal assistance that is both trusted and reliable. With Carlson Bier, you’ll partner with exceptionally skilled lawyers specializing in dog bite injuries who understand both the emotional trauma and the pursuit of compensation for victims. We are known throughout Illinois for our expert understanding of state laws related to animal attacks, delivering unwavering commitment that culminates into favorable resolutions for clients. At Carlson Bier, we handle your case personally from start to finish ensuring transparency and regular updates about every progress made on your file. Trust us not simply because we excel at what we do, but because empathy rides high on our values chart; making us an ideal choice when it comes to fighting for justice due after distressing incidents like dog bites. Why allow suffering when professional help is within reach? Choose Carlson Bier as your preferred legal recourse against any forms of pain inflicted by canine aggression today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lake in the Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of experienced personal injury attorneys committed to delivering quality legal services throughout the state of Illinois. Our practice spans across various facets of personal injury law, including dog bite injuries. Dog bites can result in severe physical and emotional trauma. With us by your side, you’ll receive comprehensive guidance and robust representation that protects your rights and works tirelessly towards securing fair compensation.

Dog bite injuries can range from minor punctures to serious wounds requiring extensive medical intervention. Understanding the scope of such injuries is vital when seeking justice for yourself or a loved one:

• Puncture Wounds: Sharp dog teeth can lead to deep punctures which risk leading to infection if not treated promptly.

• Scarring: These can significantly impact both the aesthetics and functionality of affected body areas long-term.

• Emotional Trauma: The psychological impact brought on by violent dog attacks may lead to anxiety disorders, PTSD, or other mental health issues.

Despite common misconceptions surrounding dog-bite cases, negligence on behalf thereof the owner could be proven even without demonstrating prior knowledge about their pets’ hostile tendencies. This follows a strict-liability statute in Illinois where owners are automatically held liable after their pet has caused harm regardless of any pre-existing information regarding aggression in said pet’s behavior.

Successfully navigating dog-bite claims hinges upon specific elements that need validation:

– Identifying the Owner: It’s crucial to correctly identify and locate the owner of the attacking canine.

– Medical Documentation: Your claim should include detailed medical reports indicating severity, prognosis, treatment plan and associated costs.

– Corroborative Evidence: Any form of third-party validation such as witness testimony or surveillance footage strengthens your case considerably.

The course taken by law enforcement officers following an attack frequently plays a key role in these cases too; they usually file reports themselves after surveying scenes post-monitoring standard protocols—this often includes seizing offending animals temporarily pending further investigation.

Joining forces with our skilled personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier will provide you access to top-notch legal counsel in Illinois, focusing on your unique situation. We aim to ensure each client feels heard, their concerns addressed, and their cases pursued rigorously. Dealing with dog bite injuries can be a trying experience; however, having experienced attorneys who understand the nuances of injury law in Illinois can make all the difference.

While we are not based in Lake in the Hills, our expertise covers the full stretch of Illinois state – assisting victims from diverse regions without compromising on quality or commitment levels despite geographical boundaries.

Determining compensation for dog-bite-related injuries involves various factors: medical cost incurred (both present and future forecasts), lost earnings during recovery periods considering possible disability implications; non-economic damages like pain & suffering brought about by said incident—these aspects together inform compensatory figures aimed at fully indemnifying victims wherever possible. Each claim is as distinctive as the individuals behind them – we keep this belief central while crafting bespoke strategies tailored aptly according to clients’ specific needs.

Experience uncompromised representation coupled with unwavering dedication when it comes to your fight against unfairness—we are here every step along this journey providing comprehensive legal support for optimal outcomes. If you are ready to take a stand against those responsible for your trauma resulting from a dog bite injury, click on the button below. You can swiftly find out how much your case might be worth without any obligation or upfront fees. At Carlson Bier, your struggle becomes ours—and together, we march towards justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake in the Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lake in the Hills

Areas of Practice in Lake in the Hills

Cycling Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering skilled legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Mishaps

Adept in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents get reasonable settlement for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Accident

Delivering specialist legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Focused on offering dedicated legal services for clients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​