Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Lake in the Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the repercussions of a spinal cord injury, rely on the expert legal assistance provided by Carlson Bier. Powerfully enforcing your rights in Lake in the Hills, our attorneys bring sterling expertise to bear through personalized advocacy. We strive relentlessly for justice, aiming to maximize compensation for victims of these debilitating injuries. As an established personal injury firm in Illinois, we utilize our experience and knowledge about spinal cord injuries litigation effectively to meet your diverse needs. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize understanding each client’s unique situation; grasping medical complexities and navigating intricate laws is second nature to us. Our attorneys are proficient at confronting insurance companies or negligent parties who downplay their responsibility towards your suffering. Recovering from such life-altering injuries demands exhaustive finances; let us fight for you while ensuring fair financial support designated for long-term care requirements comes your way.

Our dedication reflects clearly in unyielding case management with personalized comfort every step of the way – because at Carlson Bier, it isn’t just about winning – It’s about safeguarding futures adversely impacted by spinal cord injuries conditions much like yours.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Lake in the Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a distinguished personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. Our seasoned legal professionals recognize that a spinal cord injury is one of the most life-altering traumas you can suffer, with physical, emotional, and financial costs associated with it. For those living out this reality or caring for someone who is, we offer exhaustive and practical information along with expert guidance.

A spinal cord injury can result from various circumstances like vehicular accidents, sporting events, falls, industrial accidents or medical malpractice among others – these might feature lesser-known yet equally significant causes which often go undetected without professional counsel.

There are two primary types of Spinal Cord Injuries: Complete and Incomplete. A complete Spinal Cord Injury results in an absence of sensory function below the level of the injury area on both sides of the body while an incomplete Spinal Cord Injury still allows some level of function or sensation below the damaged area.

Understanding what to expect as part of treatment necessitates awareness about:

• Initial Treatment: Emergency medical care focuses on preventing further damage.

• Surgical Options: Depending on severity, surgeries aimed at stabilization may be required.

• Rehabilitation Programs: These include physical therapy and occupational therapies for enhancing motor skills and accessibility adjustments respectively.

• Technology Assistance: Devices such as voice-activated systems help regain independence during recovery.

The aftercare resources too are indispensable – support groups ranging from mental health counseling to caregiver services become crucial components towards rebuilding life post-injury.

Navigating through these complexities can be daunting but you don’t have to do it alone. The laws surrounding personal injuries especially spinal cord-induced ones can seem nebulous at first glance; having experienced attorneys from Carlson Bier advocating your cause transforms this journey into manageable milestones encouraging seamless transitions through every phase.

Our expertise spans across secured compensation amounts covering present and future rehabilitation costs; ensuring appropriate levels of pain-and-suffering damages besides identifying actionable claim paths irrespective of the injury’s source.

Being vested with trust from countless clients over the years, we’ve shown unfaltering dedication in bringing justice to the affected, striving tirelessly until every avenue is explored and each case sees closure. As staunch believers in ‘Knowledge empowerment’, we encourage you to browse through other informative sections on our website to understand more about your rights as an accident victim.

Trust that our solid legal foundation coupled with a steadfast commitment positions us well to guide you toward receiving maximum compensation. Our firm operates a ‘No Recovery, No Fee’ policy ensuring absolute transparency without any financial risk on your part – it is rooted arbitrarily in successful resolution achievement where attorney fees are accounted for only if there’s a recovery award won for your case.

In the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, emergent questions can cloud decision-making ability; reaching out for professional help becomes not just an option but a necessity. Embracing informed decisions within this sensitive legal field does entail familiarity with these intricate processes involved – achieved by accessing comprehensive yet easy-to-understand resources and facilitated further through personal guidance from legal experts at Carlson Bier.

If you or someone close has had their lives drastically interrupted due to such injuries – remember; enforcing rights commend timeliness alike compassion. In light of recognizing starkly varying circumstances surrounding each individual, we have made initiating interactions easier than ever before—simply tap on the button below looping directly into one-on-one conversations with our team ensuring open channels remain perpetually accessible sans any restrictions whatsoever.

Don’t let confusion loom over urgent needs while sapping crucial energy that could be better utilized towards road-to-recovery milestones: Click on the provided link hereby empowering you with information potential right at fingertips making filing claims seem less burdensome. Preceding recovered worth assessments accompanying timely consultations promise deserved compensatory relief awaiting realization – seize this moment today compelling tomorrow towards brighter promise!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake in the Hills Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Lake in the Hills

Areas of Practice in Lake in the Hills

Bicycle Collisions

Specializing in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying professional legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Accidents

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for harms and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Collision

Providing professional legal services for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for losses.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on offering compassionate legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Focused on assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer