FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Lake Petersburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced slip and fall accidents in Lake Petersburg, Carlson Bier is the legal team to turn to. Our reputation as consummate professionals within this field of personal injury law has been hard-won through dedication, perseverance, and an unwavering commitment to our clients. With a keen understanding of Illinois law regarding such accidents, we’re ever-ready to give your case the meticulous attention it deserves. We immediately start by undertaking an exhaustive investigation into your incident’s circumstances while presenting compelling arguments on your behalf. We are notorious for challenging any attempts by the responsible parties or insurance companies who seek to avoid just compensation after these unfortunate events. When seeking restitution following a slip and fall accident in Lake Petersburg, selecting Carlson Bier means choosing diligence and tenacity overlaid with empathy – securing justice for you won’t simply be something we do but rather who we are! Trust us; trusting Carlson Bier equates with placing yourself in capable hands.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Lake Petersburg Illinois

As one of the premier personal injury law firms in Illinois, Carlson Bier is dedicated to defending the rights of victims who have been injured due to another party’s negligence or recklessness. Among various types of personal injury claims, Slip and Fall Accidents are quite prevalent and require particular attention from experienced lawyers.

These accidents occur when an individual slips, trips or falls due to hazardous conditions on someone else’s property, leading significantly to injuries – minor or devastating at times. Conditions for these mishaps can range from wet floors without warning signs and poorly lit areas, to uneven sidewalks or steps without handrails. Managing a case relating such incidents demands thourgh understanding of legalities surrounding premises liability—a domain where our team excels with its robust experience.

A successful claim has a few key components which must be proven:

– The existence of a dangerous condition caused by the owner or occupier

– Awareness -or lack thereof— regarding potential danger that led to accident

– Direct relationship between dangerous condition and occurred injury

Presenting concrete evidence that supports each component strengthens your case multifold and that’s our prime strategy at Carlson Bier.

Navigating through these complexities involved in pursuing slip and fall accident cases can be daunting for victims suffering physical pain coupled with emotional distress, hence trusted assistance offered by knowledgeable attorneys becomes absolutely pivotal. Having eminent record in winning numerous Slip-and-Fall lawsuits makes us an apt choice for those seeking expert advice on it—catering to all your queries about specifics like applicable state laws in Illinois regarding limit on time period to file lawsuit; figuring out who can be held legally responsible; interacting with insurance companies etc., all while protecting your best interest tirelessly.

Beyond this victim-facing professional service is an unavoidable circumstance—the financial impact post slip-and-fall accidents that make matters even worse owing to incurred medical bills apart from lost wages often not covered by insurance policies completely—which persuades folks into considering filing personal injury lawsuit for seeking rightful compensation. Today, having a successfully proven record—rests largely on expertise of your legal counsel so associating with competent attorney becomes imperative.

Our attorneys are well-apprised in determining whether the owner or occupier of property can be held legally responsible for your injuries and are skilled in presenting evidence compellingly to ensure full compensation for victims. Whether it’s challenging insurance carriers who often undervalue claims, or negotiating settlements with offending parties—clients trust us to resolve their cases efficiently maximizing potential payout.

Another important aspect we handle is navigating through Illinois’ comparative negligence law where victims may still recover damages even if they were partially at fault… though total recovery amount will reduce by degree of own fault…but our attorneys ensure that you receive fair judgement, protecting your rights at all times while handling Slip-and-Fall claims.

With Carlson Bier as your ally, stay assured that quality representation is provided throughout the process—from initial consultation to claim filing till achieving successful resolution—making sure clients feel valued and supported amidst their traumatic experience.

We understand deciding on right lawyers during these distressing times could be overwhelming hence recommend readers here to avail free case evaluation personalized specifically based on details you provide requiring no upfront costs! While realizing how much one could potentially recover from a personal injury lawsuit only once it commences formally; by clicking the button below—the expert attorneys at ‘Carlson Bier’ will help better estimate range against which your case might be worth—proving advantageous before diving deeper into complicated yet beneficial territory of legal proceedings involving Slip and Fall accidents! Click now – Learn more – Get empowered!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Petersburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lake Petersburg

Areas of Practice in Lake Petersburg

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering adept legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Delivering dedicated legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving defective products, extending expert legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Slip Accidents

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on helping victims of car accidents receive equitable settlement for wounds and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending adept legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for damages.

Construction Incidents

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on ensuring expert legal services for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​