FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lanark

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one becomes the victim of a Dog Bite Injury in Lanark, Illinois, every decision made can significantly impact your future. Amongst these crucial decisions is selecting a proficient lawyer to represent and guide you through the intricacies of such injuries’ legal repercussions. It’s at this juncture that Carlson Bier steps forward as your prudent choice. As an experienced personal injury law firm specializing in Dog Bite Injuries, our dedicated team understands the profound effects such incidents bear on victims and their families both emotionally and financially; hence comprehensive support tailored to each case is provided throughout the process. Expertise built over years allows us to diligently seek maximum benefits for clients from responsible parties while ensuring all relevant regulations are meticulously abided by during representations. Trusting Carlson Bier amplifies your chances towards achieving rightful compensation without adding undue stress amidst turbulent times – an essential factor for anyone engulfed within dog bite predicaments around Lanark.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lanark Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury attorneys group in Illinois. We leverage years of experience and industry knowledge to advocate for those who have been the unfortunate victims of Dog Bite Injuries. Dog bites can cause severe physical injuries such as lacerations, punctures, infection, and even emotional trauma which could ultimately alter your life significantly. Understanding the steps that should be taken in filing a claim can be laborious and overwhelming; hence our pledge to dismantle these challenges by guiding you seamlessly through this endeavor.

Dog Bite Law within Illinois pivots on ‘strict liability’- emphasizing that dog owners are held responsible if their pet hurts someone, except in abnormal circumstances like when the victim was provoking or trespassing. When reeling under agonizing bite wounds coupled with a taxing recovery period involved after such incidents, this legislative backing provides solace that justice can be sought.

Here are some key points about the legal landscape of dog bite injuries:

– Proofs Validity: Victims must demonstrate how they were lawfully present at the bite location during the incident.

– One-Bite Rule: Contrary to many states where “one-bite rule” holds grip – implying owners won’t face charges for first-time biting incidents – there’s no such protection offered to negligent handlers in Illinois.

– Damage Caps: Fortunately for victims, our state doesn’t impose a cap on damages garnered from a successful case.

Our seasoned team at Carlson Bier is adept at scrutinizing hospital bills along with other direct/indirect costs to ensure that every penny involved is accounted for during settlement discussions or court proceedings. You’re not just another case number here; we genuinely care about your rehabilitation process and long-term welfare.

Beyond merely financial compensatory measures – imagine horrific scarring or ongoing mental duress – it’s essential also to recognize non-economic concerns favorably impacting ultimate claim value. This aspect sees “pain-and-suffering” awards varying widely across cases, hence the indispensable requirement for a seasoned attorney who understands how these nuances could galvanize your case strategy.

Next, embrace the reassurance that you’re not alone. Dog bites in Illinois are reasonably common; statistics revealing approximately 1,000 US citizens require medical attention daily due to dog attacks. This evidence strengthens our driving passion at Carlson Bier – we firmly believe such distressing incidents shouldn’t devolve into further financial despair for victims.

To this end, it should be comforting knowing that rarely is any “upfront” fee required engaging our services. We operate primarily on a contingency basis – meaning we don’t get paid until you do! When burdened with agonizing wounds and troubled minds after severe incidents as dog bite injuries, the last concern you need is worrying about legal consultation fees.

At Carlson Bier, each case receives personalized attention. Our team channels ardent dedication toward achieving satisfactory settlement out of court where possible or confidently strides ahead towards litigation when necessary.

Should uncertain instances arise seeking defense gargantuan insurance companies’ claim denial, reduce worry since navigating this tumultuous tunnel forms our absolute forte. So while healing physically and mentally post such distressing incident is indeed paramount; let Carlson Bier shoulder your stress through unflinching passionate representation that guarantees best results relative to unique circumstances.

All said and done: You’re likely curious regarding realistic expectations from claim proceedings — How much exactly could your case be worth? Hence comes our final note of encouragement – hesitation shouldn’t linger any longer! Rest those doubts to ease by clicking the button below — step closer embracing rightful deserved peace through accessing empowering information answering critical queries lingering atop mind space!

Remember: Advocacy isn’t merely spoken here at Carlson Bier…it’s practiced relentlessly ensuring topmost commitment supporting just rehabilitation aiding seamless return towards precious normalcy!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lanark Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lanark

Areas of Practice in Lanark

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Giving specialist legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Mishaps

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents get appropriate compensation for wounds and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring professional legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in assisting clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​