...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Leaf River

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Dog Bite Injuries in Leaf River, you deserve rigorous representation that is well-versed and experienced. That’s what Carlson Bier brings to the table as a top-tier personal injury law firm in Illinois. Our expert attorneys have an impressive track record of successfully representing victims affected by dog bite incidents within the locale and beyond it. We understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll a dog bite can inflict on individuals and families alike. Utilizing our deep knowledge of Illinois’ legal landscape surrounding animal attacks, we provide compassionate yet fierce advocacy aiming for favorable outcomes for our clients—maximizing compensation while safeguarding their rights every step of the legal journey. Rest assured; much as your case needs careful attention backed by purposeful action plans tailored differently per client situation – this principle drives us at Carlson Bier consistently delivering results for victims maneuvering through complex Dog Bite Injury cases across Illinois!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Leaf River Illinois

Expertly navigating the complexities of personal injury law, Carlson Bier offers exceptional legal representation for victims in Illinois who have suffered as a result of dog bite injuries. We dedicate our vast experience and specialized knowledge to helping you understand your rights and guiding you towards achieving due compensation for your pain, suffering, medical expenses, and loss of income.

Dog bite injuries can range from mild punctures to severe wounds that may require extensive medical treatment. In some cases, attack victims may endure emotional trauma or long-term psychological effects. The physical scars left behind are irrefutable proof of their ordeal but addressing these issues alone often leads to partial justice at best. With Carlson Bier standing with you every step of the way, you get more than just legal help; you gain an ally truly invested in getting your life back on track.

Whether it’s proving liability against an irresponsible dog owner or negotiating comprehensive settlements from insurance providers, we leverage our expertise to fight relentlessly for victim’s rights. Notably:

• We put forward compelling arguments to establish negligence on part of pet owners.

• We aggressively negotiate with insurers ensuring they fully account for all damages inflicted.

• Clients benefit from tailored legal strategies aimed at maximizing deserved payouts.

As patience is paramount when fighting for full compensations in dog bite cases, we take pride in providing support throughout this process – even if it means going beyond the courtroom. Starting from building robust lawsuits based on meticulous fact analysis right up to facilitating dealing with deep-rooted fears triggered by such traumatic events possibly through therapy or counselling referrals, our services extend well beyond standard litigation parameters.

Further demonstrating an unwavering commitment towards client wellbeing after any unfortunate incident involving canine aggression includes being transparent about requisite timelines connected with potential case resolution. While prompt action is crucial following an incident involving animal attack-related harm so as not to miss out on vital opportunity windows precipitating successful claims outcomes; necessary waiting may be unavoidable given complexities associated regarding conducting thorough investigations.

Moreover, dealing with an injured child poses unique challenges as Illinois law follows the attractive nuisance doctrine. Here, even if a child provoked the dog leading to a bite, it’s the responsibility of pet owners to ensure their animals doesn’t pose danger to such ‘attractive nuisances.’ Thus Carlson Bier makes sure minor victims are treated fairly and expressively in court while championing for adequate restitution that duly considers future needs besides immediate expenses.

Discouraging premature settlements is another one of our strong points we aim at highlighting during first consultations which clients can avail free-of-charge as part of initial case evaluations. By doing so, we drive home some hard truths regarding why settling early may simply translate into untimely compromises given how insurance providers often try downplaying injury scopes thereby circumventing full obligation spectrum under disguise of kindly stepping up or quickly closing matters thus leaving victims short-changed without realizing same until it’s too late – a scenario we vehemently fight against by striving towards securing optimum resolutions feasible under given circumstances.

At Carlson Bier, your journey towards recovery never equals having to navigate legal mazes alone; rest assured you’ll find unending support be it related litigation nuances or coping strategies concerning personal trauma management aspects always aimed at holistic healing focusing not only physical injuries but deep psychological wounds inflicted by horrific dog attack incidents etched possibly permanently within subconscious realms making everyday routines painful reminders demanding expert assistance – prompting us proudly offering such specialized services catering all-around client

needs summed up proficiently with dedicated personalized attention

Wondering what your case might be worth? We invite you to click on the button below where you will find our comprehensive insurance compensation calculator. This tool will provide you with an estimated ballpark figure based on standardized parameters utilized across various similar cases fought successfully over years culminating into landmark wins testimony towards relentless advocacy representing core firm beliefs echoed powerfully through unwavering client focus seen throughout dedicated approaches optimizing positive representations synonymous with fairness, justice, and righteousness. Firmly rooted within trust and credibility elements constituting Carlson Bier’s foundational pillars standing for victim rights unfalteringly committed towards delivering results surpassing client expectations time and again duly evidenced from numerous testimonials narrating triumphant victory tales penned by satisfied clients whose lives we’re proud to have touched positively.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Leaf River Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Leaf River

Areas of Practice in Leaf River

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering specialist legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending specialist legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Fall Injuries

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents secure fair payout for damages and destruction.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering expert legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to delivering compassionate legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Specializing in supporting individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​