FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Lemont

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with bicycle accidents, it is essential to partner with an experienced attorney who fully understands this specific area of law. In Illinois, Carlson Bier has earned a solid reputation for successfully representing victims of such unfortunate incidents. As experts in personal injury cases including bicycle accidents, we will go the extra mile to protect your rights and pursue compensation on your behalf. Our attorneys are skilled at navigating the complexities inherent in these types of claims while keeping your best interests front and center throughout negotiations or litigation processes. Using our strategic legal advocacy coupled with compassion and dedication, we work tirelessly towards favorable outcomes for our clients impacted by bicycle accidents across all areas we serve – emphasizing fairness above all else. Leveraging vast experience and keen understanding of local laws helps us offer top-tier representation within strict ethical boundaries at every turn – setting heartening precedents along the way that make Carlson Bier stand out as a trusted choice amongst competitors in handling Bicycle Accidents cases effectively and efficiently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Lemont Illinois

Bicycling has become one of the most popular forms of transportation and exercise, providing a range of health and environmental benefits. However, with this increased usage comes an increased risk for accidents. At Carlson Bier, renowned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our expertise lies in managing cases related to Bicycle Accidents. Understanding such incidents’ complexities allows us to deliver sound legal advice tailored to our clients’ unique situations.

Bicycle accidents often result from negligence on part of the motor vehicle drivers sharing the road with cyclists. In fact, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, it is estimated that around 75% of bicycle-related fatalities involve a car collision. While these statistics can be alarming, knowing your rights as a cyclist is paramount in ensuring you get fair treatment under law if an accident occurs.

So what makes Bicycle Accident cases uniquely challenging? There are several factors:

• Determining Fault: Establishing who exactly was negligent can be complex due to conflicting officer reports or witness testimonies.

• Gathering Evidence: This often involves technical investigation like analyzing bike damage or assessing medical records which requires specialized lawyers adept at handling them.

• Identifying Damages & Calculating Compensation: More than just immediate injuries or property damages; lost wages, future medical treatment costs among others must also be considered.

Our skilled team at Carlson Bier stands out because we take into account all these aspects when handling your case. We are masters at sifting through intricate details and constructing narratives that advocate for full compensation on behalf of injured bicyclists impacted by another party’s wrongdoing or carelessness.

We understand that no two Bicycle Accident cases are identical – each circumstance varies by location, type of collision involved such as ‘dooring’ vs ‘sideswiping’, riders involved etcetera – thus generating unique comparative laws and statutes application within them. Given this backdrop along with conceptual legalities concerning contributory negligence claims versus pure comparative fault systems among others, trust us to adeptly navigate the web of legalities and ensure you get treated fairly.

Additionally, by working with medical professionals or accident reconstruction experts when needed, we ensure that every piece of necessary information is taken into account for a strong case. Regardless of how challenging these investigations may be, our dedication towards securing fair compensation keeps us driven throughout the process.

Time is often one variable over which we have little control after an accident occurs. But we promptly attend to cases — involving evidentiary dynamics such as surveillance footage disintegration timelines or witness memory fade nature – factoring in deadlines from Illinois’ status of limitations on personal injury lawsuits.

At Carlson Bier, our commitment isn’t just about winning trials but about advocating for safer roads and improved standards to prevent future bicycle accidents. It’s this holistic approach that has set us apart in handling Bicycle Accident cases across Illinois- from understanding individual narratives behind each case to ensuring those narratives are recognized under law towards ultimately safeguarding bicyclists’ rights at large.

So if you’ve been injured in a bicycle accident and need guidance on what steps or decisions lie ahead – rest assured knowing that by reading till here – informed attorneys from Carlson Bier stand ready assist you through it all right away. We invite you to take the first step onto your road toward justice today. Click on the button below to find out how much your case worth and discover real partnership with a group dedicated towards seeking deserved redressal – because while accidents might seem like mere mishaps; their impacts reverberate deeper than perceived – resonating life-altering changes! Don’t let such pivotal junctures steer lone-headed- secure highly skilled backing instead; contact Carlson Bier now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lemont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lemont

Areas of Practice in Lemont

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving specialist legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Offering expert legal services for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Slip Accidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents gain just recompense for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Crash

Extending experienced legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Focused on extending specialized legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at managing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440