Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Lemont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can cause monumental changes to your life and the ones you love. These injuries often entail severe physical, emotional, and financial burdens. Amidst such upheaval, it’s essential to have advocates who understand your situation– that’s where Carlson Bier comes into play operates relentlessly on behalf of spinal cord injury victims across Illinois. Why choose us? Our expert legal team focuses specifically on personal injury law with specialized knowledge in dealing with complex spinal cord injuries cases; ensuring our clients receive maximum compensation for their suffering.

Our attorneys are deeply familiar with intricacies and nuances surrounding each case type–from understanding medical facts concerning specific damages to untangling the maze-like insurance claims processes while fighting for what is rightfully yours.

We value our client relationships built on trust and respect while consistently delivering personalized attention within professional boundaries making sure every step aligns strategically towards achieving justice for the victim’s sufferings.

Remember, timing is crucial in these matters. The sooner we act; greater chances stand at recovering not just compensations but also finding closure amidst adversities caused by such devastating accidents conveying resilience towards brighter days ahead.

Put simply: when dealing significant aftermaths like spinal cord injuries – rely upon Carlson Bier! Rest assured knowing experienced legal professionals diligently backing you up through these trials times ready to ensure proper justice gets served efficiently and effectively.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Lemont Illinois

As a personal injury law firm, Carlson Bier takes spinal cord injuries and their repercussions seriously. Navigating the complexities of these cases requires years of specialized knowledge and experience that we bring to the table for our clients. Based in Illinois, we understand the local nuances in laws which can greatly influence your case’s potential outcome.

Spinal Cord Injuries are often life-altering; they not only affect an individual physically but have significant emotional and financial impacts. These can result from various incidents such as car accidents, slip and falls, or workplace accidents. As varied as the causes may be so too are the resultant injuries – ranging from minor nerve damage to paraplegia or quadriplegia.

Several key factors make legal representation in spinal cord injuries indispensable:

– Comprehensive understanding of medical terms: Often times, these cases involve complex medical terminologies that need expert interpretation for effective litigation.

– Calculating future expenses: Assessing immediate losses is important but taking into consideration long-term costs like rehabilitation, care needs and home modifications is vital too.

– Proving Fault/Negligence: Establishing liability forms a big chunk of this complex puzzle that is best handled by experienced attorneys.

Carlson Bier boasts a dependable team renowned for its vast knowledge on spinal cord injuries litigation. Over the years, it has handled numerous claims making it well equipped to advocate vehemently for compensation you truly deserve.

At Carlson Bier, we conduct thorough investigations on your behalf relying on top medical experts when required ensuring no stone is left unturned when proving negligence caused your spinal cord injury. We meticulously build compelling arguments aimed at achieving maximum recovery compensations for you covering all aspects including pain & suffering, loss wages due to time off work or diminished earning capacity, bill payments etcetera related directly/indirectly with your injuries sustained.

We value transparency held together via mutual respect – thus keeping you informed regarding progress being made throughout the legal proceedings. Remember, we provide free case evaluations for anyone who has suffered from a Spinal Cord Injury in the state of Illinois ensuring you understand what to expect moving forward.

While spinal cord injuries can often result in despair and seemingly overwhelming problems ahead, it is crucial to remember that you need not face this journey alone. Having seasoned attorneys such as Carlson Bier by your side can significantly alleviate stress associated with navigating these intricate matters.

Importantly, realize that every decision taken immediately post-injury could have lasting implications on your potential compensation recovery claims. Hence it’s imperative you consult us before signing any documents so as to fully safeguard all rights thus being able to focus completely on your healing process without added worries concerning legal aspects involved – because that’s our job!

There’s also no issue about where we’re based. It is against Illinois law to advertise an office location we don’t physically exist, hence rest assured when choosing Carlson Bier since our physical presence matches exactly what’s advertised.

In sum, spinal cord injuries require effective representation through law firms like Carlson Bier who offer their expertise combined with compassionate care towards each individual client they serve. Our ultimate goal remains helping victims rebuild their lives post life-altering accidents regardless of complexity or severity involved inherent within every single case entrusted upon us.

We kindly invite those interested furthering exploring possibilities of pursuing damages related typically with spinal cord injury incidents happening throughout Illinois State, click below specifying how much potentially be entitled receiving due specific circumstances surrounding yours personally unique ordeal endured unfortunately.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lemont Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Lemont

Areas of Practice in Lemont

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving professional legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing specialist legal representation for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Trip Incidents

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Collisions: Focused on helping patients of car accidents receive equitable recompense for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering specialist legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Focused on offering specialized legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in supporting victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer