...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Limestone

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Limestone and have been the unfortunate victim of a dog bite injury, trust Carlson Bier to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you deserve. As experienced personal injury attorneys, we specialize in handling complex cases like dog bite injuries. Each year numerous people suffer due to preventable canine-related incidents; emotional trauma and physical damage can be extensive. Carlson Bier is dedicated to supporting victims through their recovery journey from such distressing experiences – we understand your pain because your fight becomes our cause too.

Our expert team assesses each case meticulously, offering personalized counsel based on Illinois law specifics concerning dog bites. We are well-versed in proven strategies that increase success probability for fair settlements or victories at trial when necessary.

Choose Carlson Bier as your preferred legal representation today, serving those affected by dog bite injuries with diligence commitment and compassion akin to local family values which Limestone stands for, whilst adhering strictly to Illinois legislation regarding lawful services advertisement out of respect for our clients’ trustworthiness.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Limestone Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the traumatic experience of dog bite injuries with all its physical and emotional ramifications. Each year in Illinois, scores of individuals are unfortunate victims to such incidents. If you’re in this unlucky group, recall that you’re not alone; we’re here as experienced personal injury attorneys to guide and support you.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries. They don’t just inflict instant physical pain but may also develop into complex medical conditions over time hence demanding extensive medical treatment and gnawing mental unrest. Physical damage from dog bites varies, ranging from minor scratches on the surface to deep puncture wounds inducing serious infections like rabies, cellulitis, or C-cap.

Illinois state law entrenches responsibility for pet owners under what’s termed “Strict Liability.” Under this legal framework:

– The owner is held accountable for a dog bite irrespective of whether the dog has bitten someone previously.

– It applies even if there were no prior signs of aggressive behavior by the animal.

– This regulation nullifies any argument about ignorance on part of the pet owner.

Though certain exceptions exist (if the victim was trespassing or provoking), majorly it directs an established course towards your justified compensation claim through legal channels.

Even with these provisions safeguarding your interests under Illinois law, navigating through complexities involving insurance companies post such unfortunate incidents could be taxing as they might seek endeavors to minimize claims payout. Our seasoned personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier have substantial knowledge in dealing with intricacies of personal injury claims involving dog bite cases – ensuring fair settlement for compensation encompassing immediate/recurring medical expenses, lost wages due to injury downtime alongside trauma affliction.

Understanding education concerning various nuances related to Dog Bite Injuries safeguards one’s interest during trying times when engulfed by confusion/frustration around whether resulting damages constitute legitimate cause for legal action against negligent pet owners in Illinois jurisdiction. Herein entails importance key points enlisted herewith:

– Ascertain whether the dog’s owner is covered by homeowners’ insurance as such policies often cover dog bites.

– Gather evidence – photos of the wound, eyewitness testimonies promoting a strong stance for your case.

– Seek immediate medical attention showcasing severity and documenting the injury officially influencing its robust representation in court.

– A note on statute limitations in Illinois allows two years from biting incident date to file a lawsuit. After lapse, victims may potentially forfeit rights to compensation.

At Carlson Bier, our dedicated personal injury attorneys believe comprehensive education about dog bite injuries empowers rightful action against negligent pet owners aligning with your deserved maximum settlement or damage awards. We strive towards resolving even most complicated cases tactfully given our adept exposure extending over decades in personal injury law practice.

Having sustained through a painful ordeal of dog bite injury, you must not hold back to reclaim what is justfully yours– bearing upfront costs while we aggressively represent your interests shouldn’t be concern tethering justice claim perceptions owing no fee policy until recovery acknowledging unexpected financial struggle engagements during unprecedented crises.

Invaluable consultation at Carlson Bier characterizes steering clients towards requisite resolution paths leveraging vastly experienced personal attorney assistants within purview of justful legitimacy underlining empathy in every step taken toward desired relief restoration.

Through this comprehensive guide on Dog Bite Injuries, we hope you gained insightful knowledge and are confident about the necessary legal steps that follow such incidents. Any level of dog-induced injury can have severe consequences and deserves apt legal attention and subsequent compensation. Wondering how much could you recover for damages inflicted upon? Just click on the button below to gauge an estimate cost valuation affiliated with your unresolved case; it’s time justice unfolded its course!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Limestone Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Limestone

Areas of Practice in Limestone

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying adept legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Occurrences

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Collisions: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Collision

Providing expert legal advice for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Committed to advocating for clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​