Medical Malpractice Attorney in Lincoln

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Are you seeking expert representation for a medical malpractice case in Lincoln? Look no further than Carlson Bier. Our firm boasts an impeccable track record, fighting tirelessly and successfully on behalf of our clients who have been unjustly harmed. In the complex labyrinth of medical law, expertise is paramount – this is precisely what Carlson Bier offers. We are well-versed in Illinois statutes and court procedures associated with medical negligence cases. Not only do we comprehend the intricate intricacies related to these legal suits but also understand the deep emotional toll victims bear due to such unfortunate events.

Trust us to meticulously scrutinize each detail of your case using an innovative yet empathetic approach ensuring nothing goes unaddressed; a step that culminates into robust courtroom arguments aiming at achieving justice for you.

Why choose Carlson Bier? Unlike many outfits, we put our client’s needs first; working relentlessly until suitable compensation has been awarded as retribution for their understandable pain & suffering inflicted by negligent parties within healthcare circles.

Remember: when seeking justice through legal channels following instances of Medical Malpractice – turn towards experience and passion; turn towards Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Lincoln Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we take pride in specializing as a prominent law firm to handle personal injury matters. We dedicate ourselves to providing relentless representation focused on Medical Malpractice for every client we serve across Illinois. Understandably, the concept of medical malpractice is often daunting and indistinct for many individuals, which may hinder them from taking rightful legal action against potential negligence. In this regard, our mantra at Carlson Bier embodies the belief that education empowers – so let’s explore years of our collective wisdom.

Medical Malpractice can be illustrated as an act or omission by a healthcare provider that deviates from accepted standards in medicine. This deviation becomes harmful or substantially impairs one’s life, contributing to either direct injury or worsening existing conditions. Recognizing such instances plays a crucial role in standing up for one’s rights.

Key points forming the foundation of this subject include:

– Healthcare professional’s failure to provide standard care: Every patient has the right to receive ‘reasonable standard of care.’ It is considered Medical Malpractice when healthcare professionals fail to offer such quality of care leading to injuries or ill-treatment consequences.

– Direct casualty due to neglectful behavior: It must be evident that injuries resulted directly from the practitioner’s negligent behavior which breaks away from standard practices.

– The presence of significant damages owing to the negligence: Minor harm does not justify claims since costs involved with pursuing it might exceed possible recoveries; substantial personal damage justifies grounds for these claims.

Within Illinois and its diverse communities – home also to our offices – victims suffer yearly due primarily because they’re unsure if their case falls under ‘Medical Malpractice.’ Our team holds an exemplary record in guiding countless like-minded victims towards justice rightfully owed them through proper legal channels using their deep domain knowledge around this area’s complexities.

Our attorneys adapt an intricate hands-on approach reviewing medical records, directing independent examinations whenever necessary corroborating with experts across fields related ithen submitting compelling presentations standing as undeniable testament to what clients endure due to malpractice. Simply put, Carlson Bier functions not merely as your law firm but rather as allies rallied behind rights you’re entitled to.

As we near the discussion end, a word of caution becomes necessary – Time is critical! Illinois operates under “statute of limitations” concept allowing a lawsuit within two years from when the victim learned of their injuries and inherently connects it with medical care received. So acting promptly paves the way for stronger legal advocacy, richer access to evidence hence directly influencing outcomes significantly in your favor.

In our attempt towards delivering insightful information around this challenging topic, we’ve barely scratched at its surface. Medical Malpractice’s depth extends furthermore into labyrinthine tunnels where Real-Life experiences often differ from textbook prescriptions. For this very reason, countless individuals across Illinois place heightened trust in our attorneys owing their extensive experience dealing close-handedly with various cases.

Carving pathways through daunting legal corridors demands expert navigators who bring more than merely knowledge into play – something which defines us uniquely at Carlson Bier being reinforced by victims assisted over prolonged durations establishing numerous precedent victories across boardrooms.

We encourage all visitors seeking answers specific to their situations examining scenarios far beyond mere general advice. Look no further; finding accurate assessments tailored around personal circumstances stands just a click away!

Drilling down specifics related smartly towards maximizing potential case value isn’t distant anymore! Don’t shy away from getting legislative help embarking on true paths leading rightly towards dues rightfully owed you. Your journey starts here – Click below now & Unveil Real Worth underlying your unique case right today backed through our strong expert’s support!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lincoln Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Lincoln

Areas of Practice in Lincoln

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying skilled legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for harms and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Providing adept legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for damages.

Construction Accidents

Committed to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Specializing in extending professional legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Committed to advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer