...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Burn Injuries in Litchfield

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to burn injuries, handling the aftermath can be incredibly stressful. With medical bills piling up and possible loss of income, it’s essential to have strong legal representation on your side. Turn to Carlson Bier – experienced attorneys skilled in fighting for victims of burns, they’re well-versed in Illinois laws regarding such matters. Their extensive knowledge and aggressive tactics allow them to advocate effectively for maximum compensation for pain & suffering, lost wages or any other damages incurred because of a burn injury incident. The moment you decide professional counsel is required; consider retaining their services as your attorney team on call ready to act swiftly and efficiently fight your cause. Even though Litchfield isn’t their base location; they demonstrate an unwavering commitment towards serving clients across Illinois with equal dedication and tenacity irrespective of geographical boundaries within the state lines.

The dedicated lawyers at Carlson Bier not only provide much-needed legal guidance but also offer empowering support throughout this challenging time where every decision counts heavily – truly making a difference apart from just winning lawsuits! Choose committed professionalism with expertise when choosing Carlson Bier as your burn injuries lawyer representative in any part mattering most in navigating these complex issues strategically with substantial impact!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Litchfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we believe in bringing value and reassurance to our clients at every point of their journey. As your trusted Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, we deal with a wide range of cases, one among which includes burn injuries. This page is designed to enlighten you about burn injuries—what they encompass, their potential causes, categories of severity and how the legal framework applies to them.

Burn injuries on the broad horizon are harm inflicted upon the body’s tissues due to heat, radiation, radioactivity, electricity or chemicals. Each type comes with unique symptoms and issues that may affect an individual both physically and emotionally. Many accidents involving these elements can lead to life-altering circumstances requiring long-term medical care.

Given that our primary concern is your welfare and proper understanding of such situations, let us delve into distinct burn levels:

-First Degree Burns: These burns generally cause minimal skin damage. They affect the outer layer of skin causing pain and redness but usually heal within a week without professional medical treatment.

-Second Degree Burns: Moving deeper into the skin, these burns impact both first layer(epidermis) and second layer(dermis). Symptoms extend from blisters to intense reddening coupled with severe pain/swelling. Professional medical attention becomes crucial at this stage.

-Third Degree Burns: The most menacing form of burns damages all layers—epidermis through subcutaneous tissue—incurring possible nerve damage. These require immediate emergency attention due to their severe nature.

The varied causes for these catastrophic happenings include car/industrial/workplace accidents to defective products/equipment/household appliances onto scalding from hot liquids/gases or even deliberate acts by others as seen in assault cases.

Carlson Bier diligently works around vital aspects such as identifying responsible parties based on negligence theory where a person’s wrongful act leading up-to catastrophic injury results in legal liability. While detailing all cause-effect relationships concerned becomes instrumental in holding wrongdoers accountable.

Burn injuries demand serious functional assessment and financial estimation considering the comprehensive treatment they entail— immediate care, hospitalization, skin grafting surgeries, rehabilitation therapies alongside pain & suffering. As daunting as these medical complexities may sound, the legal processes associated are even more intricate to navigate independently especially when it comes to insurance companies aiming at lowest possible settlements.

Enter Carlson Bier – your key legal ally! We dedicate ourselves not just to comprehensively understand your unique situation but also enable best plausible resolution. Our success carousel spans from multiple million-dollar judgments & settlements for victims of severe burn accidents that testify both our expertise and commitment towards you.

At this juncture let’s clear up a vital aspect about

our location: we are unambiguously based out in Illinois (not Litchfield) thereby assuring complete privilege confidentiality under attorney-client jurisdiction norms whilst ruling out any probable misconceptions or misleads thereupon.

With years of experience in formidable advocacy and precedent-setting lawsuits, our team leaves no stone unturned to achieve justice for unfortunate victims coping with the traumatic aftermath of burn injuries. It is our utmost goal at Carlson Bier Associates that you reach maximum compensation corresponding to emotional/physical trauma borne and receive necessary closure enabling rebuilt life thereafter.

Here’s where you come into play – click on the button below to find how much could your case possibly be worth? Trust us at Carlson Bier associates, because every case is personal to us and we will battle relentlessly until you can see light at the end of the tunnel!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Litchfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Litchfield

Areas of Practice in Litchfield

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending skilled legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing professional legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Mishaps

Professional in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents gain appropriate settlement for harms and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending experienced legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Damages

Committed to extending compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​