FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Litchfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a spinal cord injury in Litchfield can be life-changing and choosing the right legal representation is paramount to securing justice. Carlson Bier offers unrivalled expertise and compassionate counsel for victims of such serious injuries. With their extensive knowledge on the complexities related to spinal cord trauma, coupled with their relentless pursuit for maximum compensations, they’ve successfully championed countless cases like yours throughout Illinois state. Rest assured that with Carlson Bier advocating on your behalf, you receive strategic guidance tailored specifically towards the unique challenges presented by these severe personal injuries. They understand both the physical strain and emotional distress associated with spinal cord incidents – everything from medical bills to lifestyle changes – which is why each client’s case management plan undergoes rigorous detail-attention guaranteeing maximum potential compensation recovery via litigation or settlement route in line with Illinois law regulations. When faced with a deep-seated challenge following an unfortunate spinal injury incident, make Carlson Bier your preferred choice; trusted allies dedicated entirely to reclaiming what rightfully belongs to you: peace of mind alongside financial reparation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Litchfield Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted source for expert guidance and legal representation in all matters pertaining to spinal cord injuries. Our extensive experience within the Illinois jurisdiction arms us with invaluable insights that can mean a world of difference for our esteemed clients.

Spinal cord injuries are complex, life-altering events often resulting from accidents or unexpected medical issues. Understanding them is instrumental in exploring potential legal avenues and underscores Carlson Bier’s commitment towards empowering its clients.

One important aspect lies in comprehending the different types of spinal cord injuries – complete and incomplete. Incomplete spinal cord injury implies some degree of function retention below the injury level whereas a complete injury means total loss of functionality. In both instances, one has legal rights which should be investigated.

Moreover, causes of such injuries also carry significant weightage within a lawsuit context:

– Motor vehicle accidents: This stands as the leading cause for spinal cord traumas constituting 38% cases globally.

– Falls: Particularly prevalent among elderly individuals aged above 65; it accounts for roughly 30% of all occurrences.

– Violence incidents: Gunshot wounds or knife attacks making up approximately 14% incidents

– Recreational activities/sports mishaps: Account around 9% cases and include diving into shallow water, soccer games etc.

Delving deeper into associated complications enhances our understanding further. Secondary medical conditions likely to occur post-injury may include pressure sores, respiratory issues, bowel/bladder malfunctions among others.

Addressing monetary damages connected with spinal cord trauma includes gauging insurance details or seeking compensation if applicable. Be it lifetime care costs or loss of earnings due to disability; quantifying these aspects forms an integral part of any successful litigation procedure.

While each case presents unique circumstances demanding bespoke strategies; Carlson Bier promises unwavering dedication purposed towards securing maximum possible compensation on your behalf. We tenaciously seek justice by scrutinizing every minute detail – from medical reports to prognostic implications – and cross-referencing them against every legal option available within the State of Illinois.

Our team’s key strength remains our comprehensive understanding of Illinois legislation regarding spinal cord injuries. Leveraging this to our clients’ advantage, enables us all to reach favorable outcomes consistently. More importantly though, at Carlson Bier we prioritize compassion, maintaining an empathetic approach towards individuals dealing with such a traumatic life-changing event.

Navigating through these complexities requires experienced hands-on professionals capable of ensuring your rights remain protected through every step. For anyone currently confronting such issues, it is critical that you obtain proper legal counsel immediately.

Rest assured – choosing Carlson Bier guarantees commitment towards advocating for you aggressively in obtaining full compensation permitted by Illinois law. We strive to help alleviate financial burdens during a tough period by actively seeking justice on your behalf.

As your preferred personal injury attorney group based in Illinois but not located specifically in Litchfield, let Carlson Bier fight tenaciously on your behalf. We work continuously towards securing maximum feasible compensation to aid you and your loved ones surmount challenges during demanding times related to spinal cord injuries.

Consider taking the first step today. Discover how Carlson Bier could potentially ascertain the value of your case without any obligation or upfront cost whatsoever. Just click the button below for more details…Because Justice Matters!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Litchfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Litchfield

Areas of Practice in Litchfield

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying specialist legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Tumble Accidents

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for injuries and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Accident

Delivering experienced legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Focused on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Focused on extending dedicated legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in representing individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​