...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Livingston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or your loved ones suffered from a dog bite injury in Livingston, Illinois? Look no further than the seasoned experts at Carlson Bier. Renowned for impeccable jurisprudence in personal injury law, they command robust knowledge and proven track record catering to dog bite injury cases specifically. Understanding that every case is distinct—with its unique circumstances—they judiciously devote personalized attention to guiding their clientele through the complex legal labyrinth. With their adept understanding of Illinois’ specific laws surrounding animal attacks, seeking recompense for victims injured due to negligent pet ownership becomes seamless under their guidance. They efficiently navigate tort law intricacies thereby easing your path towards obtaining rightful compensation for medical expenses, psychological trauma, lost wages and more. Finally yet importantly, with an unwavering focus on ethical practices—a cornerstone of Carlson Bier’s philosophy—assures absolute transparency throughout proceedings without unfounded claims of location specificity—an assurance as per statutory compliances in Illinois state legislation governing attorney advertising norms.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Livingston Illinois

When we speak of personal injury cases, one category that claims significant attention are Dog Bite Injuries. At Carlson Bier, as seasoned and proficient personal injury attorneys, we make it our mission to provide critical legal assistance for dog bite victims across Illinois. Our qualified practitioners possess extensive knowledge of various facets related to dog bite law and its practical applications.

Dog bites can lead to harmful results such as physical injuries, psychological trauma and financial setbacks due to medical expenses. Not all victims are aware that they have the right to seek legal compensation for these unfortunate outcomes. This is where Carlson Bier steps in – acting swiftly and effectively on behalf of the victim, procuring the financial recompense necessary for recovery.

Delving deeper into Dog Bite law involves important aspects like:

* Identifying who bears fault or liability in a dog bite incident.

* The distinguishing rules pertaining specifically to ‘dangerous’ breeds.

* Degree of negligence by owner which contributes significantly towards determining the nature of settlement.

In Illinois, under the Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5), an owner is held liable if their pet attacks without provocation and causes damages while ‘not at large’. Keeping your well-being our priority here at Carlson Bier elevates understanding these complex laws from mere reading comprehension into actionable advocacy that defends your rights vigorously.

It’s worth mentioning that there are instances where dog owners may escape liability. These include if you were trespassing or provoking the dog just before being bitten. As your trusted team at Carlson Bier, we will meticulously examine the unique elements of every case presented before us so no potential angle remains unchecked.

While focusing on the intricate yet crucial details surrounding each case becomes our first order of business; keeping comprehendible communication with you – our client – stands paramount throughout this process along with timely progress reports about your case via clear language anyone can understand.

Securing skilled legal representation after a dog bite accident not only provides the victim peace of mind, but it also increases the chances of receiving rightful compensation. The Carlson Bier team works relentlessly to arbitrate claims with insurance companies or even take matters to court when necessary. Rest assured our devoted and relentless lawyers would not leave any stone unturned in securing your rights.

To discuss potential defenses owners might try and use such as ‘contributory negligence’ or ‘assumption of risk’, the experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier can provide invaluable guidance, transforming these complex legal jargon into understandable advice which plays a vital role during negotiations for settlements.

Remember that strict Illinois law prohibits injury Attorney groups from declaring representation in cities where no physical offices exist. Therefore, while we are not located in Livingston; Carlson Bier can confidently assist you and fervently advocate for your rights if you’ve been a dog bite victim within Illinois.

Time holds great essence following an unfortunate event like a dog bite incident. Our eager team is ready to offer swift legal advice and get started on building your case right away because we understand the financial strain victims might be under due to medical cost burdens. Let us help alleviate those distressing concerns swiftlyand professionally.

Take that first critical step towards claiming your justice by clicking on the button below because knowing how much your case may be worth instills power during recovery. Comprehensive support combined with timely action is crucial here at Carlson Bier, so don’t hesitate – reach out today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Livingston Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Livingston

Areas of Practice in Livingston

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying adept legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal help to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Stumble Injuries

Skilled in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents gain fair compensation for damages and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Crash

Ensuring expert legal advice for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to offering specialized legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to defending patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​