FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Lockport

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve suffered a bicycle accident in Lockport, it’s crucial to have exceptional legal representation on your side. Carlson Bier stands at the ready, providing individualized and comprehensive legal support for personal injury victims. Serving clientele with utmost dedication and zealous advocacy has solidified our reputation as a staunch defender of cyclists’ rights. Leverage our vast experience and nuanced understanding of Illinois law to receive the compensation you rightly deserve. We champion pursuing meticulous investigation coupled with innovative strategies aimed at maximizing value for each case we undertake. Our portfolio boasts numerous successfully negotiated settlements that display an impressive track record built over years of relentless endeavor in personal injury cases related to bicycle accidents. Trust Carlson Bier; let us elevate your voice amidst narrative uncertainty often fraught within complex legal terrains surrounding bicycle accidents all around Illinois -this is about far more than just reaching an agreeable settlement; this is about justice served righteously where it’s warranted.Essentially upholding your rights in court becomes effortless when backed by Carlson Bier’s formidable expertise.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Lockport Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on providing top-tier representation to individuals who have sustained personal injuries in various scenarios, including bicycle accidents. With our expertise grounded in Illinois law, we aim to demystify the legal complexities that envelop such unfortunate incidents.

Bicycle accidents can result in serious injuries leading to significant medical expenses, loss of earning capacity and emotional distress among other inconveniences. They may occur due to a plethora of reasons ranging from careless drivers failing to respect dedicated cycle lanes and traffic signals, poorly maintained roads or faulty bicycle components. In situations like these, victims are entitled to seek compensation for their predicament.

• Firstly, mere involvement in an accident is not enough; you must prove negligence on the part of the opposing party. This involves showing that they had a duty of care towards you but failed to uphold it.

• Secondly, causation has to be established implying that the opponent’s breach resulted in your injury.

• Lastly, specific damages whether physical or financial should be demonstrated directly resulting from said accident.

Even though bicyclists share equal rights with motorists on Illinois roads under its ‘Share the Road’ decree; stipulations within laws like The Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5) should factor during claim evaluation. Therefore understanding Illinois-specific bicycle laws are paramount for successful prosecution of such cases.

Additionally, helmet use though advised isn’t mandated by Illinois state law. Consequently failure to wear one may preclude insurance companies from diminishing awarded compensation based on contributory negligence clause where victim’s partial fault reduces recovery amount proportionately.

Interestingly touchpoints abound regarding statute of limitations which refers duration within which lawsuits must filed post-accident occurrence otherwise risks claim invalidation. It generally spans two years for personal injury claims although varies dependent upon case specifics making timely legal advice critical.

Compensation sought may broadly span categories viz Economic Damages encapsulating all monetary losses incurred including medical bills and lost wages whereas Non-Economic Damages covering pain, suffering and emotional distress. In select cases Punitive Damages might be merited aiming to penalize defendants for particularly egregious conduct and send a deterrent message. However, these are not to enrich plaintiffs thereby necessitating experienced legal counsel for apt estimation.

Naturally multiple factors influence compensation quantum received like injury severity, proving liability, insurance policy limits among others. Moreover Illinois adopts comparative negligence model implying if plaintiff is found partially liable their total awarded damages decrease by fault percentage assigned which complicates claim processes further warranting adept representation.

Legal recourse post bicycle accidents can be complicated involving in-depth understanding of insurance policies, tort laws and negotiation tactics effectively leading towards optimum settlements. Retaining an attorney soon after an accident may help properly document injuries and identify potential defendants by conducting comprehensive on-ground investigations while ensuring timely lawsuit filings within guided statutes of limitation.

At Carlson Bier our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys harbor tremendous experience handling litigation ensuing from bicycle accidents tailoring client-centric strategies attuned with unique case nuances thus maximizing your recovery possibilities. Our diligent endeavor revolves around securing the recompense you deserve enabling you to focus entirely on recuperation without confronting added financial uncertainties or procedural complications.

We invite you therefore to take the first step toward securing your rights and compensations today by clicking on the button below. Let us evaluate your situation and provide an estimation for what your case could potentially garner in terms of fair compensation before entering into any binding commitments. Rest assured we at Carlson Bier strive tirelessly towards realizing justice for all hurt cyclists ardently safeguarding every slice of their entitled rights in utmost accord with Illinois law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lockport Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Lockport

Areas of Practice in Lockport

Bike Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering experienced legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering skilled legal services to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Trip Incidents

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents get just compensation for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Trucking Incident

Delivering expert legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Focused on providing compassionate legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in assisting patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440