Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lombard

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury, securing expert legal representation is paramount. This is where Carlson Bier comes in – your ideal channel for advanced understanding and experience in this intricate field of personal injury law. As residents of Lombard are painfully aware, such injuries require astute navigation through state laws and municipal ordinances to secure justice. Our distinguished attorneys are well-versed in Illinois State’s laws pertaining to dog bites. We leverage extensive knowledge combined with strategic approach focused on achieving maximum compensation for victims while holding guilty parties accountable provide our clients nothing short than best legal service involving various cases canine attacks inflicting serious harm each year across whole region non-localized means represent over areas too ensuring that regardless location we can assist you timely compassionate support From initial consultation complete representation throughout process Carlson Bier should be go-to choice when need dog-bite attorney assurances dedication success sets us apart from others know what it takes provide top-tier services so please don’t hesitate to reach out us today help navigate through complexities these claims protect rights

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lombard Illinois

Personal injury cases bring with them a myriad of challenges and complexities, especially when dealing with complex legal processes and nuances. Among these various personal injury incidents, dog bite injuries stand out for their unique set of circumstances that require specialized attention from experienced attorneys. At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our extensive experience in providing compassionate and effective representation for victims of dog bite injuries across the state of Illinois.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical damage and emotional trauma. Victims may face complications such as disfigurement, infection, nerve damage or psychological harm. Beyond immediate medical treatment, these injuries often necessitate ongoing care including plastic surgeries or psychological counseling services. It’s essential to understand your rights under Illinois law if you find yourself or a loved one in such unfortunate circumstances.

The laws governing dog bite liabilities vary greatly from state to state but in Illinois, the Animal Control Act holds owners strictly liable for damages an animal inflicts upon another person without provocation. This means that even if a dog has never shown aggressive behavior before or the owner was not negligent in handling the pet, they could still be held accountable if their dog bites someone.

Key points to note about this legislation include:

* The victim must have been acting peaceably at the time of attack.

* The victim had lawful right to be at the location where the bite occurred.

* No provocation toward the animal prior to aggression.

Pursuing compensation after a dog bite incident can involve numerous documented expenses beyond initial hospital bills such as loss of income during recovery period; medical costs related with future reconstructive surgery; mental health support like therapy sessions for overcoming fear or PTSD induced by attack; plus punitive damages too.

Having an experienced attorney at your side is paramount—someone who understands what it takes to navigate through this multifaceted process successfully while ensuring maximum possible compensation considering all potential sources of solatium available under Illinois law.

At Carlson Bier, we stand ready to be your dedicated advocate in this often complex and trying time. We bring years of experience, a depth of knowledge regarding Illinois’ laws and court systems, and a commitment to ensure your rights are upheld to the forefront. Our team has helped numerous victims successfully win their dog bite injury cases over the years. Our tailored approach means we treat each case with individual attention it deserves, ensuring all aspects of your situation are covered by thorough research and preparation for settlement discussions or courtroom if required.

Remember, specific details matter greatly in these cases – from where the incident took place down to the exact actions both parties involved just before attack. Therefore, timely consultation with personal injury lawyers becomes crucial after such incidents so no piece of evidence gets missed out which could potentially strengthen your claim later on.

Perhaps you have more questions about Illinois dog bite laws or how Carlson Bier can support you through this process — don’t hesitate! Knowledge is the key and we believe in empowering our clients by providing exhaustive information suited to their unique situations. Moreover, we offer an open gateway to consultations and assuredly commit ourselves towards achieving justice for all our clients facing dog bites injuries.

So why wait? Click on the button below now, let us understand your case closely then provide comprehensive guidance on how much are you rightfully entitled from such traumatic experiences due to another’s negligence – because at Carlson Bier, we fight tirelessly until injured reclaim life once more into their own hands.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lombard Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lombard

Areas of Practice in Lombard

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Offering professional legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Offering experienced legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Tumble Accidents

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents receive equitable recompense for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring professional legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Focused on providing compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Committed to assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer