...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Long Creek

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury in Long Creek can be overwhelming, but the qualified team at Carlson Bier is poised to help. With significant experience handling personal injury litigation, we have a keen understanding of Illinois laws regarding such injuries. Our firm’s commitment lays in advocating for victims’ rights while seeking maximum compensation for pain and suffering experienced as a result of dog bites. We believe that no victim should bear the financial strain brought about by another person’s or entity’s negligence. Carlson Bier takes pride in providing diligent and sensitive representation throughout each case – because you deserve nothing less than the best legal support during this trying time. Trust us with your Dog Bite Injuries claim and discover dedicated advocacy tailored to secure outcomes that genuinely honor your needs. Remember – when bitten, choose wisely; choose Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Long Creek Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that the severity of dog bite injuries can be traumatizing and life-changing. As a distinguished personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, our objective is about more than just seeking compensation for you; it’s about ensuring your rights are protected and promoting uttermost healing and recovery.

Dog bites often result in severe physical injuries such as lacerations, punctures, fractures, tissue loss, or infections. This alarms the need for immediate medical attention which inadvertently leads to mounting medical bills putting victims under emotional and financial distress. Beyond the visible wounds and scars lies another spectrum of psychological trauma that might manifest itself through fear, depression or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The magnitude of these impairments is part of why understanding Dog Bite Laws in Illinois is crucial.

Illinois operates under “strict liability” meaning that dog owners may still be liable even if they were not overtly negligent or did not know their dogs could act aggressively. Factors taken into account when determining fault include verifying whether the victim was acting peacefully without provocation and asserting whether he/she had a legal right to be where the attack took place.

Key points to remember:

– Strict Liability: Illinois holds dog owners accountable irrespective of any previous aggressive behavior from their pet.

– Peaceful Behavior: To have a case you must conclusively verify you were exhibiting peaceful demeanor during the incident.

– Legal Right: You should demonstratively proof that you had legal grounds to be at the location of occurrence.

Building a strong case requires collection & organization of proper evidences such as photographing injuries before they heal, keeping track of medical bills related to treatments including therapeutic ones for mental health issues like PTSD/Anxiety disorders triggered by an attack plus documenting lost wages while unable to work due to recovery timescales etc.

Our dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier utilize their experience derived from handling numerous dog bite cases across Illinois which bolsters our ability in building strong, compelling cases. We’re there with our clients throughout the entire process, from your initial consultation to negotiating a fair settlement or advocating for you in court if necessary.

Navigating through the legal waters of personal injury claims can be overwhelming and confusing spreading constant fearfulness about missing deadlines or inadequately filing incomplete documents and forms leading to case dismissal. The legal professionals at Carlson Bier are here to take over that burden, ensuring every step is meticulously handled according to Illinois law policies towards securing maximum compensation due without added stress onto you/your family’s plate.

Additionally, we offer our services based on contingency fee structure; meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case by successfully gathering financial recovery settling deal plus leaving no stone unturned until justice delivery matches your satisfaction underlined whilst maintaining utmost confidentiality & respect towards each victim’s predicament circumstances encountered while fighting at your corner until victory envisaging compassionate legal guidance bestowed upon whenever needed reflecting Carlson Bier’s fundamental mission towards nurturing client relationships built on trust, integrity, honesty and transparency.

If you’ve suffered from a dog bite injury in Illinois, it’s integral that you exercise your rights! Feel free to click the button below and let us help determine what financial compensation is conceivable based on specific details surrounding your unique individualized case structure. Take back control over negative ordeal after effects stirring life-quality disruption set forth as let us navigate the path towards desired justice attainment dissecting complexities via effective legal counseling route provided harnessed for all-encompassing benefits anticipation revealing perennial relief exerted turning eventual tides favorably manifested into rightful deserved compensation brought forward.

Remember – You don’t have to face this alone! Foster entrustment within Carlson Bier expertise while bringing peace of mind back into daily life aspects previously rattled alongside guarantee assurances realized maximally stemming holistic recovery prioritization focus maintained assuredly throughout aiming for triumphant breakthrough turnaround outcomes implemented assertively elevated qualitatively top-notch legal service facilitation indulged for viewer’s optimal applicative benefit capitalization commanded. Together, we can make the difference publicized painstakingly toward evoking client satisfaction optimization redefined creatively employing your potential case worth’s value accentuated fleetingly unfolded.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Long Creek Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Long Creek

Areas of Practice in Long Creek

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Offering expert legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Stumble Occurrences

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents receive equitable compensation for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Accident

Delivering adept legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Committed to extending professional legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to supporting patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer