...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Long Creek

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal recourse after a pedestrian accident in Long Creek, the exemplary services offered by Carlson Bier can make all the difference. Our team of accomplished personal injury lawyers brings a wealth of experience and profound legal insight to every case. With our unyielding commitment to justice, we help clients navigate intricate Illinois laws related to pedestrian accidents, ensuring they not only comprehend their rights but also secure the compensation they deserve. At Carlson Bier, we provide comprehensive representation—meticulously collecting evidence, liaising with insurance providers and relentlessly advocating on your behalf in court if need be—all aimed at achieving an optimal outcome for you. We emphatically believe that no one should bear the burden of medical costs or loss of earnings due to someone else’s negligence on the roads. In serving those affected by pedestrian accidents around Illinois including Long Creek communities with utmost diligence and empathy – we prove why Carlson Bier stands out among personal injury law firms. Trust your case in our judicious hands for unwavering support and stellar advocacy throughout your journey towards reparation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Long Creek Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical, emotional, and financial hardship that being involved in a pedestrian accident can entail. Our dedicated team of experienced personal injury attorneys stands ready to extend our services to ensure your rights are protected during this difficult time. Pedestrian accidents often result in significant and sometimes life-changing injuries. The first step towards seeking justice begins with understanding exactly what a pedestrian accident is.

In essence, a pedestrian accident refers to any incident where an individual walking on foot becomes involved in an accident – generally involving motor vehicles or bicycles. Although these tragic events can occur in various circumstances, several common scenarios often lead up to such instances: distracted driving (where drivers aren’t paying attention to the road), failure to yield at crosswalks or intersections, speeding near highly populated areas like school zones and parks, impaired driving due to alcohol or drug use are among them.

When it comes to ensuring compensation for damages accrued from these incidents, Illinois law maintains certain provisions under which claims may be pursued:

• Negligence by drivers: Drivers are expected not only just obey state traffic laws but also exercise general care for the safety of pedestrians

• Comparative negligence: Even if you as a pedestrian have been partly responsible for the accident occurring (e.g., crossing outside designated areas), you may still be entitled claim partial recovery proportionate with another party’s fault.

• Statute of Limitations: In Illinois, you must file your claim within two years from the date of the accident.

These key facets underline why securing specialized legal representation like Carlson Bier has is vital following such accidents. We possess extensive experience working on similar cases which gives us insights into grooming effective strategies tailored specifically for pedestrian accident victims.

Another crucial point centres around understanding who might be held answerable beyond just motorists in the aftermath of such incidents. Beyond potentially negligent car or bike drivers their insurance companies too feature prominently amongst those liable – allowing you clones stake further avenues for compensation. Here at Carlson Bier reimbursement we particularly help you strive towards encompasses the likes of medical bills (from emergency care to ongoing therapy as needed), lost wages and earning capacity from being unable to work, pain and suffering caused by injuries sustained, emotional distress or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.

Working with us gives you access to a broad spectrum of resources we’ve built over years in this industry. Our team doesn’t just file lawsuits; we assist in investigating each case thoroughly, working hand-in-hand with accident reconstruction experts when required to prove fault. Furthermore, understanding that these cases can be a race against time is critical – contact with attorneys should be initiated promptly after incidents occur since vital evidence may become harder to retrieve or could even get destroyed as days pass.

At Carlson Bier advocates – rooted firmly in Illinois – we don’t have our core commitment limited merely around achieving satisfactory legal outcomes. Rather, part of our mission extends into nurturing an environment where, through detailed educational resources like these alongside perseverant representation services ensured by our established experience on-ground; clients who seek us out gain not just structural support but imbibe empowering knowledge that lays bare personal injury claims’ often complex labyrinth.

Remember: Your journey towards seeking justice doesn’t have to be walked alone – there are highly competent professionals ready and willing to safeguard your rights every step along the way. As a closing note let’s point out something undeniable: learning more about one’s potential avenues never hurt anyone. Why not seize the opportunity right now? Click on the button below and discover what your case might truly be worth – because placing faith in unknown isn’t sheer gamble anymore; it’s relying upon tried-and-tested expertise solidified over decades at play infusing justice back within reach!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Long Creek Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Long Creek

Areas of Practice in Long Creek

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending skilled legal support for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Providing experienced legal services for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying specialist legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Trip Incidents

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure fair settlement for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering professional legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Building Accidents

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​