FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Lovington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accident is challenging, both legally and emotionally. You need experienced legal counsel by your side who are committed to ensuring justice is served. Trust in Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm proficiently operating in Illinois. The team of knowledgeable attorneys at Carlson Bier specializes in dealing with complex pedestrian accidents cases to help individuals pursue rightful compensation and ensure responsible parties are held accountable for their actions. Advanced experience dealing with intricate traffic laws gives them an edge when it comes to seeking justice efficiently and effectively for you. What sets Carlson Bier apart is their unwavering commitment towards personalized attention dedicated solely towards understanding each client’s circumstance meticulously before charting the best course of action accordingly. With exceptional legal advice from empathetic attorneys like those at Carlson Bier, clients can rest assured that they’re receiving comprehensive support during this tough period as well as fervent litigation expertise aimed at maximizing damages recovery under Illinois statutory limitations pertaining to pedestrians’ rights on roads.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Lovington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to zealously representing our clients who have been victims of pedestrian accidents. Based in Illinois, our team of seasoned personal injury attorneys understand the intricacies and complexities that surround such unfortunate incidents. The road to recovery after a pedestrian accident can be difficult and daunting. It is filled not only with physical pain but also considerable financial strain due to medical bills and loss of earnings. However, you do not have to walk this path alone; we are here to help.

Pedestrian accidents occur more commonly than one might initially think, often leading to serious injuries or even fatal outcomes. Individuals on foot are incredibly vulnerable when sharing spaces with moving vehicles for obvious reasons – lack of protective barrier being the most critical among them. When you’re faced with an environment where large quantities of steel are maneuvering at high speeds driven by potentially distracted operators, the chances of life-altering injuries increase exponentially.

• Causes: Many factors could contribute to these unfortunate accidents including but not limited to driver negligence (implications ranging from DUIs and speeding, deviating from traffic rules), environmental hazards (improper maintenance/debris in walkways) as well as distraction caused through technological devices both on part of motorists & pedestrians.

• Injuries: Due regards given to their unprotected nature; pedestrians tend sustain damage at a higher intensity. These may include broken bones, spinal cord trauma leading up paralysis or brain injuries potentially causing permanent intellectual disability.

• Legal Remedies: Thankfully there exist statutes within Illiniois law which protect rights of its pedestrian populace offering legal recourse enabling fair compensation subject upon proper demonstration in court through diligent case building derived upon comprehensive factual basis backed by apt procedural knowledge

The process following a pedestrian accident can feel overwhelming – reporting the accident, seeking medical attention, dealing with insurance companies, preserving evidence – all while trying to heal physically and emotionally from your ordeal merits professional guidance every step along the way.. This is precisely where we at Carlson Bier step in to represent your right to full and fair compensation.

Each pedestrian accident case presents its unique set of circumstances. We meticulously investigate every aspect, gathering crucial evidence that solidifies your claim. Out team consults with expert witnesses like accident reconstruction specialists, medical clinicians, vocational experts amongst others to build a robust and compelling narrative- one which resonates materially within court chambers ensuring maximum possible recovery for our clients’ physical, emotional & economic tribulations.

Understanding the complexity of these laws is not easy; it takes years of experience guided by undeterred purposefulness – fortunately attributes possessed by our dedicated legal teams at the ready to diligently cater your requirements pursuing justice on your behalf.

We are not just focused on rendering sound legal advice but also act as a pillar of support through these trying times standing shoulder-to-shoulder with you filled with empathy; fortified with resolve. This shared journey towards justice is what drives us relentlessly pursuing the ‘right’ in an imperfect world filling colors back into monochromatic worlds left shattered post harrowing pedestrian accidents.

Placing value onto something so personal as human suffering caused by someone else’s negligence can seem like an opaque process. But worry not! At our firm, we leverage technology along side experienced methodology aiding calculation of worth against furnished facts pertaining unique aspects around each individual client’s circumstance following diligent legal analysis.

Find out how much YOUR case is worth–click on the button below. Take this important first step toward obtaining justice and reasserting control over the events impacting your life, let Carlson Bier be there for you guiding light house in tumultuous seas liberating through valorous representation perpetually vigilant over rights imbibed upon you – cherished citizenry protected under Illinois law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lovington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Lovington

Areas of Practice in Lovington

Bicycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving specialist legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Tumble Injuries

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents get just recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Incident

Providing expert legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in delivering expert legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spine Damage

Dedicated to representing persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​