FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lower West Side

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury can be traumatizing and navigating the legal aftermath need not add to your distress. Allow Carlson Bier, Illinois based experts in personal injury law, to shoulder that burden for you. Our attorneys specialize in cases involving dog bite injuries, armed with an intimate understanding of how best to represent the victims and ensure they receive their rightful compensation. The professionals at Carlson Bier dedicate themselves tirelessly towards each case within Lower West Side’s proximity because we believe everyone deserves competent representation when pursuing justicefor their injuries. Our firm stands out due to our unwavering commitment and exceptional track record of securing satisfactory outcomes for our clients affected by Dog Bite Injuries around Lower West Side area; proving why Carlson Bier should be your first consideration when choosing representation for such matters. Based on significant local jurisdictional experience, we competently handle all complexities ensuring maximized client benefits throughout the process . Entrust us with your path towards healing after a dog bite incident; through superior professional services offered by Carlson Bier Law Firm.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lower West Side Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we deeply understand the trauma and pain endured by individuals who have been victims of dog bite injuries. As an Illinois-based personal injury attorney group, our primary mission revolves around advocating for your rights, ensuring justice is administered, aiding in your healing journey, and ultimately securing a deserving compensation as expediently as possible.

Firstly, it’s crucial to acknowledge that dog bites can result in severe physical harm ranging from lacerations to potentially fatal diseases such as rabies. It’s essential not only to seek immediate medical attention but also to attain legal representation promptly. You may be confronted with expensive medical bills and might endure emotional distress due towards the traumatic incident; thus, initiating a claim against the pet owner or their insurance company becomes crucial.

• Dog owners should maintain control over their pets at all times.

• In most cases of dog bites claims; negligence on part of the owner is established.

• Pet insurance companies handle settlements in scenarios where the pet owner has appropriate coverage.

Accomplishing this can lead you down complex paths which demand extensive knowledge on Illinois’s personal injury laws relating specifically to dog-related injuries—a niche area where Carlson Bier specializes. Our team diligently handles each aspect tied remarkably creating a foolproof case—documenting evidence adequately exhibits ownership wrongdoing or neglect leading precipitously towards accurate requisitioning compensatory resolution associated directly with inflicted damages both physically emotionally enabling clientele focus primarily recovery journey while allowing us handle many intricacies involved within litigation arena providing comprehensive extensively customer-focused legal service awaits potential clients seeking representation amidst unfortunate circumstances surrounding dog bites incidences.

In Illinois, under what’s known as “strict liability” rule for dog bites like other states follow too implies when one efficiently proves actual ownership concerning errant canine subsequently held liable ensuing damages regardless whether previous knowledge notorious behavioral aspects existed not essentially paving way incredibly high success rates linked establishing financial responsibility coincides effectively managing aftermath unpleasant occurrence involving pet attack serious consideration particularly if accused ownership disputes thorough investigations avail clear conclusive findings provide critical backing personal injury case.

• Illinois’ strict liability laws hold dog owners responsible for injuries caused by their pets.

• The legal definition of ‘owner’ includes anyone who shelters, cares for, or has custody of the animal.

• Status as an innocent victim is crucial—previous unprovoked provocations towards the pet could complicate your claim.

At Carlson Bier, our legal experts have successfully enabled numerous clients in achieving rightful recompense following such unfortunate events. We pride ourselves on our compassionate approach towards each client’s sufferings and meticulous attention to detail when establishing irrefutable proof against negligent pet owners.

We understand how encountering a dog bite injury can be traumatizing leaving not just physical wounds but deep psychological scars too. Let us offer you moral and professional support necessary to ensure that you are not left dealing with this difficult experience all alone. Create space for recovery and let us tackle the intricate facets of legislations revolving around your claim.

The law surrounding dog bites and related injuries is complex; however, applying these regulations to maximize compensation under the given scenario necessitates an adept attorney firm well versed in personal injury law practices – A descriptor fitting perfectly with Carlson Bier.

From gathering evidence to professionally handling negotiations with insurers (and even representing you at court trials if needed), we aim to procure maximum compensation possible based on individualized cases parameters emphasizing context-dependent nuances further enhancing strength every application submitted guaranteeing best possible outcome respective circumstances unique clientele reflecting dedication commitment every single endeavor pursued team highly skilled passionate advocates!

Are you ready to take control over this situation induced by someone else’s negligence that resulted in undesired suffering? Do not wait any longer. As per Illinois law governing statute limitations regarding personal injury claims time essence here act now seize initiative tackle adversity directly create opportunity obtain much-deserved sense closure justice!

For customized advice linked suited specific case requirements click button below discover case’s worth today. Start reclaiming your life back—Carlson Bier is here to help, eve-ready to facilitate a smoother legal journey ahead!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lower West Side Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lower West Side

Areas of Practice in Lower West Side

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending expert legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering experienced legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Trip Mishaps

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Accident

Offering expert legal representation for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Building Site Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Specializing in assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440