Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lynwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the unfortunate repercussion of dog bite injuries, swift and strategic legal action is crucial. Carlson Bier law firm offers unrivaled expertise in handling these complex personal injury cases. Our proud team of proficient attorneys understands the unique nuances and applicable laws related to dog bites in Illinois, thus equipping us to aggressively fight for your right to fair compensation. With a penchant for thorough investigation, we strive to build a compelling case that effectively addresses each specific circumstance surrounding your injury. What distinguishes Carlson Bier from other law firms? We nurture an unwavering commitment towards achieving favorable outcomes for our clients affected by such incidents across varied cities including Lynwood with utmost confidentiality and compassion. Our extensive understanding of the intricacies involved allows us all-encompassing insights into actionable solutions that rectify harm while ensuring justice prevails against perpetrators’ negligence or irresponsible actions involving canines That’s what makes Carlson Bier an excellent choice – when seeking effective legal representation against dog bite injuries – regardlessly wherever you are located within Illinois state.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lynwood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are vigilant personal injury attorneys in Illinois that specialize in cases where innocent individuals have suffered due to dog bite injuries. We understand the physical pain and emotional trauma that one must endure when they become victims of dog bite incidents. As seasoned litigators of personal injury, we appreciate the complex legal implications such incidents bring forward. Our dedicated team has gained significant experience over numerous years of working on similar cases, ensuring fair compensation for a myriad of clients right across Illinois.

• Dog bites can cause severe damages such as lacerations, puncture wounds, nerve damage or even psychological trauma

• The importance proper documentation including photographing your injuries and keeping track of medical bills cannot be overstated

In every U.S state, laws concerning dog bites vary but generally land under two categories: ‘Strict Liability’ and ‘One Bite Rule’. In Illinois specifically, the law falls under ‘Strict Liability’, meaning that pet owners are directly responsible for any harm caused by their pets – unequivocally.

No aspect is too minor or insignificant when it comes to pursuing justice and you deserve nothing less than comprehensive legal support during this testing time. This means:

• Understanding your rights: Even if the owner was not negligent in containing their pet from causing harm (like digging its way out), they may still be held liable.

• Navigating Insurance Companies: Dealing with insurance companies can be tricky; often using seemingly harmless statements against claimants in an attempt to lower compensation.

Upon commissioning us as your trusted legal representatives, our primary objective becomes advocating for maximum recompense on your behalf while relieving you from interacting with insurance personnel directly. Each client presents a unique case making it crucial to highlight specific aspects associated with their situation comprehensively.

Witnesses can significantly alter individual claims’ outcome:

• Witness testimony could play a pivotal role in establishing the chronology of events leading up to incident

• Neighbors previously witnessing aggressive behavior from the animal could confirm dog’s violent predisposition

Understanding dynamic factors like these and how to present them effectively is what sets us apart. Our legal know-how equips us with appropriate strategies making sure no stone remains unturned in securing your rightful claim.

Don’t let a daunting legal process deter you from pursuing justice. At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our mission of ensuring that every client receives the comprehensive attention they rightfully deserve. A vital aspect of this mission involves consistently maintaining an open channel for communication.

Maintaining consistent communication:

• Enables you to understand each step and phase of the litigation process

• Ensures all your queries are duly addressed

We believe such transparency strengthens trust, breeds confidence, and fosters long-term relationships that extend beyond individual cases. Rest assured we continue striving tirelessly until achieving a successful resolution – fair compensation that acknowledges all economic, non-economic damages faced due to unforeseen circumstances like resulting disabilities or prolonged psychological trauma.

Carrying profound experience servicing Illinois residents, we bring refined local expertise backed by ties within communities. Leveraging our extensive network allows us to better serve clients in fulfilling law-specified formalities regarding evidence collection.

Remember, it’s not just about nursing physical wounds but also regaining mental peace knowing that justice has been served. Trustworthy partnerships lay strong foundations for effective advocacy which is why Carlson Bier commits relentlessly toward accomplishing this task while addressing peripheral issues associated with personal injury suits as well.

We urge injured parties or their loved ones not to remain silent during such trying times; remember your voice can be heard through accurate representation: Carlson Bier is committed to taking up your rigors so you can concentrate on healing instead. We highly encourage exploring monetary evaluations for potential claims dealing with dog bite injuries: simply click on the button below to find out what YOUR unique case might be worth! With dedicated guidance at your service, combined with free case evaluations available 24/7, this step toward securing justice is conveniently just a click away.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lynwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lynwood

Areas of Practice in Lynwood

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering skilled legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Extending expert legal assistance for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal assistance to victims affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Stumble Injuries

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to aiding victims of car accidents gain equitable compensation for wounds and harm.

Bike Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Accident

Extending professional legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Traumas

Specializing in offering specialized legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unfair Fatality

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to assisting persons with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer