FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lyons

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Lyons, it can be an overwhelming and stressful experience. In such distressing times, you need a dedicated personal injury attorney who understands your plight. At Carlson Bier, we’re here to help. Specializing in dog bite injuries cases, our attorneys are adept at navigating the complex Illinois laws that govern this area of litigation. Our team ensures you get fair compensation while focusing on healing physical and emotional wounds inflicted upon you or your loved ones by unruly dogs gone rogue. We passionately fight for victims’ rights without compromising our ethical obligations under Illinois law—being transparent about our bases and adhering strictly to regulations regarding advertising locations is integral part of ethics at Carlson Bier firm – respect for law comes first! But geographic distance does not preclude us from providing exceptional legal services. Your journey towards justice shouldn’t involve further trauma; let Carlson Bier shoulder the burden as your go-to lawyers for severe dog bite incidents where skillful representation truly matters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lyons Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in the field of personal injury law and as a premier Illinois-based firm, our commitment is to provide our clients with an experience that’s both supportive and effective. One particular avenue of personal injury law that we’ve honed over years is cases related to dog bite injuries.

Dog bites can result in serious harm – both physically and emotionally. Painful wounds, potential exposure to rabies or other infections, and even long-term psychological trauma are usual occurrences following these incidents. Each year within the U.S., nearly 4.7 million individuals are victims of dog bites. Consequently, solid knowledge about your legal rights could be instrumental when seeking compensation for such an unfortunate event.

In the state of Illinois, we operate under the ‘strict liability’ rule regarding dog bite incidents. What this implies is that a dog owner could be held responsible for injuries caused by their pet without claimants necessarily having to prove negligence on part of the owner.

Some crucial elements that should be integrated into any potent case concerning dog bite liability include:

– Proof: Documentation of your injurious encounter typically consists of photographs showcasing injuries sustained, medical reports detailing treatment procedures along with expenses incurred due to them.

– Witness Statements: Collaborative accounts from witnesses present during the incident strengthens your argument before insurance adjusters or a jury.

– Investigation Report: Reports filed by animal control officers can be beneficial assets often listing prior complaints against specific dogs or owners suggesting repetitive aggressive tendencies.

The complexities involved in successfully navigating through these requirements make it paramount to have expert legal counsel by your side while tackling these matters, leading you towards justified recompense tailored specifically to cover all loss endured including medical costs & future bills involving therapies required due to extensive physical or emotional damage.

Carlson Bier’s experienced team procure tailor-made strategies for each individual client aiming at maximum achievable compensation for pain & suffering endured while ensuring swift restoration of normality in life post such unfortunate happenings.

One more critical point to think about during these cases is an understanding of the statute of limitations. In Illinois, you have two years from the date of your dog bite injury to file a lawsuit in civil court against the offending party. The timeline can be stringent and failing to adhere could result in your case being dismissed, making it even more essential to connect with competent attorneys promptly.

Remember, as professional legal defenders, Carlson Bier’s topmost priority is alleviating our client’s concerns and facilitating harm recovery rather than focusing on generating financial gain out of your distress. Rest assured that our efficient personal injury lawyers are adept at aggressively negotiating settlements in your favor so you can focus solely on recuperating health.

We understand that each incident brings unique considerations in terms of duration needed for physical recovery, psychological implications incurred alongside dealing with insurance companies or reluctant parties involved. Our comprehensive approach incorporates each aspect associated ensuring you’re neither underserved nor overwhelmed under such circumstances.

Irrespective if your interactions involve placid pet pooches regularly seen within neighborhoods or unfamiliar intimidating dogs triggering fear, its important remembering that injuries caused by these animals aren’t mere accidents but rather they come attached with rightful claims awaiting facilitation by proficient representation like ours at Carlson Bier.

Ready now to take control over this distressing situation? We encourage you to proceed further towards gauging potential claim value using our interactive tool conveniently placed below which also gives access for scheduling no-obligation consultations facilitating discussions about how we help turning your traumatic experience into a decisive victory upholding justice while sustaining respect & comfort all throughout.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lyons Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lyons

Areas of Practice in Lyons

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Burns

Extending adept legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering expert legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal help to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Injuries

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Infant Damages

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for damages and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Collision

Providing adept legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Specializing in offering compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440