FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mackinaw

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a dog bite incident occurs in Mackinaw, securing qualified legal representation is key. Look no further than Carlson Bier, an esteemed Illinois-based personal injury group that is well-versed in canine-related aggression cases. We understand how traumatic these situations can be and meticulously work to ensure each victim’s emotional and physical trauma is acknowledged in court. Our team of attorneys are experts in negotiating rightful compensation not only for immediate medical care but also for potential therapy services or cosmetic procedures needed due to the attack. Skilled application of technical aspects of the state’s Dog Bite Statute makes Carlson Bier stand out among peer practices. Their superior case management system allows optimal efficiency, resulting in faster resolutions without compromising on thoroughness and quality – all crucial elements when facing post-bite anguish and stress. Have peace of mind knowing your case will be handled by one the most exceptional groups within Illinois’ intricate world of personal injury law with proven expertise specifically involving dog bite injuries- trust Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mackinaw Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that accidents aren’t limited to car crashes or workplace mishaps. That’s why our team of dedicated legal professionals specialize in a range of personal injury cases, including those involving dog bite injuries. With extensive experience across Illinois state, we are steadfastly committed to helping individuals get the justice they deserve with compassionate and personalized service.

Dog bite incidents are particularly complex due to the emotional trauma it can cause both for the victimized individual and pet owner. Understanding your rights in such scenarios is essential, as under Illinois law, pet owners bear full responsibility for any harm caused by their dogs. This can include not only physical injuries but also psychological distress and other related medical complications.

Here are few key aspects must everybody should know concerning Dog Bite Injuries –

• Illinois applies the ‘strict liability standard’ meaning dog owners cannot escape liability if their pets injure someone else.

• The victims do not have to prove that the owner was negligent or knew previously that the dog might be dangerous.

• However, there needs to be evidence that the victim did not provoke the attack and he/she had a lawful right to be where the incident occurred.

Understandably, many people worry about disrupting relationships or potential retaliation when pursuing claims against neighbors or friends whose dogs inflicted injury upon them. Our skilled lawyers at Carlson Bier navigate these sensitive issues adeptly ensuring you receive available damages while maintaining peaceable relations.

The process begins with an initial consultation wherein our attorneys will evaluate your situation holistically – understanding how deeply this incident has impacted you physically as well as emotionally before developing a tailored strategy. Post which, we guide you through each step – from collecting relevant evidence like witness testimonies and medical records till negotiation proceedings with insurance companies – ensuring maximum compensation on your behalf.

As an added emphasis –

• It’s crucial to never negotiate directly with dog owners or their insurance company without legal representation – doing so can significantly limit awarded damage expenses.

• Prompt medical treatment after the dog bite incident and timely follow-ups are not just essential to bolster your claim but also to ensure complete recovery.

Remember, Carlson Bier takes no fee unless we win your case – through either negotiated settlements or court verdicts providing justice for victims and their families. Our seasoned lawyers dedicate themselves entirely focused on relieving victims off legal burdens – guiding them seamlessly through complex legal pathways while ensuring maximum compensation. Having operated across Illinois, we pride ourselves in offering personalized attention each client inherently deserves and needs.

We genuinely believe everyone should understand their rights when they’ve been personally injured – it’s critical not only from a standpoint of seeking rightful compensation but to ensure future incidents can be potentially avoided protecting others in community. To that end, whilst these bits of information provide preliminary guidance, every case is unique requiring specialized strategy aligning with ongoing changes in laws/agreements etc.

Thus, we encourage you now to take this next step towards safeguarding your rights by learning more about your potential claims’ worth specifically tailored to reflect individual condition under Illinois law. To initiate this process, simply click on the button below – taking control back into your hands for any unfortunate instances involving dog bite injuries. Don’t let these personal injuries impact your life adversely further than they already have; get started on the road of financial relief and emotional closure you duly deserve today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mackinaw Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mackinaw

Areas of Practice in Mackinaw

Cycling Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing specialist legal support for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Stumble Mishaps

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring professional legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in advocating for patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440