FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Mackinaw

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a pedestrian accident in Mackinaw, seeking legal guidance from an adept attorney is vital. In emphasizing this necessity, Carlson Bier stands out as your ultimate solution. Our proficiency empowers us to proficiently navigate Illinois laws and maintain your rights amidst the intimidating legal landscape of personal injury cases. Our goal extends beyond obtaining immediate financial compensation; we strive to safeguard your future by securing provisions for long-term injuries or loss if applicable. We diligently work to ascertain all potential sources of liability and insurance coverage, leaving no stone unturned while advocating for you. At Carlson Bier, transparent communication coupled with personalized attention ensures that we understand every facet of our clients’ journey post-accident while guiding them through each litigation step efficiently. We’re zealous about fairness and vigorously advocate on behalf of those affected by negligence-induced accidents offering accessible services round-the-clock throughout Illinois including Mackinaw city dwellers needing astute representation even though we are not physically present there but available online 24/7 bridging physical gaps instantly.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Mackinaw Illinois

Navigating the complexities of a pedestrian accident can be daunting, especially when you’re coping with physical and emotional trauma. At Carlson Bier, your well-being is our top priority as we espouse unwavering dedication to championing justice for personal injury victims in Illinois. Specializing in pedestrian accidents, we leverage our profound legal knowledge and skills to negotiate fervently on behalf of our clientele.

Pedestrian incidents are alarming occurrences that can transpire due to numerous reasons. One major cause includes negligent drivers who fail to follow the rules of the road or exhibit reckless behavior such as texting while driving or impaired driving due to alcohol consumption. Poorly maintained sidewalks and crosswalks also contribute towards these unfortunate events. Our team at Carlson Bier comprehensively understands these complexities, assisting every client in navigating through their unique situation.

To effectively fight for your rights entails understanding specific elements about pedestrian laws in Illinois:

– Unlike many states, it’s important to note that under Illinois law pedestrians do not always have right-of-way.

– Pedestrians must use a sidewalk if one is provided and safe for use or must walk on the shoulder facing traffic where no sidewalk exists.

– It is illegal for drivers not to stop for pedestrians within marked crosswalk zones.

These points underscore critical premises of laws protecting pedestrians yet they only serve as specifics within an intricate set of regulations. The depth of interpretation required mandates engaging knowledgeable personal injury lawyers like those from Carlson Bier.

At the heart of every successful case rests comprehensive evidence gathering including police reports, medical reports, eye-witness testimonies all meticulously pieced together by us at Carlson Bier. Our attorneys offer pragmatism combined with proficient technical legal counsel ensuring effective claim negotiations or compelling court representations when necessary.

Our commitment doesn’t cease upon settlement or verdict attainment – aiding recovery beyond litigation marks another core tenet reflecting our passion; making unraveling medical bills more manageable; facilitating appointments; battling insurance corporations for proper coverage are just a few ways we extend our services.

Entrusting your case to Carlson Bier alleviates stress off your shoulders, allowing healing alignment without anxiety of fighting a complex legal battle. Rest assured that Our dedicated lawyers tirelessly strive making sure every deserving client benefits from the full compensatory entitlement whether it involves loss of earnings capability, emotional distress or even punitive damages where applicable.

Moreover, involving an attorney post-accident can significantly increase compensation amounts as studies have indicated – but what does our involvement imply?

– Establishing fault by proving negligence

– Estimating and negotiating fair settlement based on injuries and losses

– Navigating through intricate insurance claims

At Carlson Bier, transparency is fundamental to our philosophy. All fees are on contingency basis which means – zero upfront costs. We get paid only when you do, linking directly to the recovery amount we secure. Thus, attaining justice isn’t determined by hefty payout capacity instead governed by merit – leveling fields for all irrespective of financial status.

Experiencing accident-induced trauma casts overwhelming challenges; facing these alone can augment stress levels at this most vulnerable time with potential setback implications for physical and psychological rehabilitation. The support offered by proficient attorneys like those found at Carlson Bier offers respite in such times maintaining focus on road-to-recovery while your rights are fought relentlessly in courtrooms or across negotiation tables.

Every individual suffering from pedestrian accidents deserves representation reflecting compassionate care coupled with uncompromising determination that resonates throughout Carlson Bier ethos.

Don’t hesitate to protect your rights using the expertise at Carlson Bier. Are you curious about how much your case is worth? Click on the button below to discover more about this crucial aspect. Knowledgeable professionals await eager to assist unmask any ambiguity veiling possibilities empowering clients towards comprehensive understanding assisting informed decision-making process characteristic of pursuing justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mackinaw Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Mackinaw

Areas of Practice in Mackinaw

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending professional legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering professional legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Delivering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure just settlement for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing expert legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Damages

Focused on extending expert legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Trauma

Specializing in defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440