Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Makanda

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating through the ordeal of a pedestrian accident in Makanda, Carlson Bier Law is an imperative ally to have. With our expertise rooted in Illinois law, we specialize in personal injury cases and diligently work for justice on behalf of our clients facing pedestrian accidents. Our skilled attorneys ensure clarity amidst complexities by effectively guiding you through your rights and obligations with steadfast precision. At Carlson Bier, it’s not only about competent legal representation; We believe compassion plays an equally vital role when seeking redress. Our team pursues maximum compensation while weaving empathy into every aspect of their litigation process—this is what makes us uniquely suited to handle such sensitive cases. Importantly, we understand promising quick outcomes ignores trauma involved—it requires time to address everything comprehensively as each case unravels uniquely differently.

Intricate laws pertain to pedestrian accidents which vary from city-to-city within Illinois; understanding these ever-changing landscapes sets us apart and equips us better than most other firms vying for your business. In conclusion: contact Carlson Bier today—we’re unquestionably dedicated towards being the powerhouse advocate that gets you across safely.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Makanda Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in matters of personal injury law and serve clients across Illinois tirelessly. Our forte lies in serving victims of pedestrian accidents, every step of the process. Pedestrian accidents are unfortunately quite common and can have severe consequences for everyone involved.

Traffic laws, negligent drivers, reckless behavior – these elements contribute considerably to risks pedestrians face daily. Frequently occurring due to motorist fault through speeding, failure to yield at marked crosswalks, or even distracted driving due to mobile devices – all these factors often lead directly to serious injuries for unsuspecting pedestrians.

We understand that injuries resulting from such incidents may leave you feeling overwhelmed and marginalized with mounting medical bills and lost earnings while recovering. That’s why we’re committed to assisting victims by offering comprehensive legal assistance during this trying time. We aim for our service to encompass not only expert counsel on your case but so much more — it is designed ultimately as a helping hand when you need it most!

In a typical pedestrian accident claim scenario:

• Victims have rights: which include compensation for medical expenses (current & future), loss of income (if unable to work due to injury),emotional distress.

• Time frames matter: Ideally claims should be filed as soon possible after the incident occurred.

• Evidence builds strong cases: It includes photos of the incident scene, witness statements and any CCTV footage available.

Being hit by a motor vehicle while walking or jogging isn’t merely about healing physically; it’s about justice too! At Carlson Bier Law Firm, we endeavor towards one ultimate goal–to get accident victims the fair compensation they deserve.

Our team explores all avenues pertinent: frequent communication with insurance companies regarding coverage policies; tireless negotiation with attorneys representing those at fault; conducting thorough investigations into circumstances surrounding each specific accident – covering ground unseen by investigating officers initially on site.

Many people experiencing such tragedy commonly reckon ‘surely there must be support?’ Well, fear not! At Carlson Bier, our heavyweight attorneys staunchly act on behalf of our clients facing the aftermath of pedestrian accidents. We are committed to ensuring that financial burden doesn’t add insult to injury after such traumatic experiences.

Guided by knowledge, fortified by experience and driven by a firm commitment to securing justice for all who step through our doors – you will find in us a reliable legal ally whose focus never strays from your best interests. Our proven methodology reflects these core principles explicitly:

• Determining responsibility: Through careful analysis of accident reports, witness statements, and other key evidence.

• Medical evaluation: Liaising with medical professionals on the long-term impact of injuries sustained during your pedestrian accident.

• Calculating damages: Assessing both current and future expenses related directly or indirectly to your accident & fight vigorously for compensation you truly deserve.

Our strong track record showcases how we have used tactics like these to secure successful outcomes – delivering substantial settlements or verdicts hence fulfilling plaintiffs’ rights across Illinois and helping countless victims stand tall once more!

Hire an advocate as passionate about fighting for what’s rightfully yours as you are about landing back on your feet after a devastating hit. After all, pedestrian accidents should find their true ending in justice being served–not simple survival!

We don’t want anyone going through this trying journey alone; hence we extend our help unreservedly. If you’re struggling with physical trauma or mounting bills following a pedestrian accident — reach out today. Don’t let uncertainty cloud your path further when skilled guidance is just one click away.

Don’t wait any longer wondering if hiring a lawyer can make a difference – it most certainly can. Please utilize the button below to see precisely how much relief could be within grasp given the specifics of your situation. Assessing worth is no mere number base exercise but instead appreciating context fully — something Carlson Bier prides itself in understanding better than anybody else around! You needn’t wonder any longer — click below now and discover the true value of your case.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Makanda Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Makanda

Areas of Practice in Makanda

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing skilled legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Incompetence

Extending expert legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Adept in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents get appropriate recompense for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Collision

Offering professional legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on ensuring expert legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Harm

Dedicated to representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer