...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mansfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing unexpected situations such as Dog Bite Injuries, you need a law firm that understands your pain and possesses the requisite knowledge for handling such cases. Carlson Bier injects decades of personal injury expertise into every matter we handle. We are seasoned stalwarts in navigating these complex legal avenues with definitive success throughout Illinois state. Achieving justice for victims suffering from dog bite injuries is our primary focus; determined to ensure compensation corresponds to their emotional and physical trauma inflicted by an errant animal owner’s oversight or negligence.

Taking advantage of our exceptional skill set means allowing us the privilege to help mint your path towards restitution while managing all associated hassles. What truly distinguishes Carlson Bier in this sphere is not just our dedication but proficiency, assiduously approach at leaving no stone unturned when advocating for clients’ rights under Illinois’s stringent dog bite injury laws.

Inserting a winning legal partner like Carlson Bier into any dog-bite related annals ensures high likelihood towards swift resolution as well as maximum recompense – immerse yourself in peace knowing you’re backed by trusted professionals versed profoundly in Dog Bite Injury litigation dynamics within Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mansfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are highly experienced personal injury attorneys committed to providing exceptional legal representation for those injured in dog bite incidents throughout Illinois. Possessing substantial skill and knowledge about Illinois law related to dog bites, we assure comprehensive guidance through each complex step of the legal process, ensuring your rights are preserved and you receive the maximum deserved compensation.

Dog bites can result not only in physical harm but also psychological distress that individuals may have to deal with for years. In such circumstances, knowing your legal rights is a powerful tool. Under Illinois’ Animal Control Act:

• Any person suffering damages due to a dog or another animal attack is liable for receiving compensation.

• A claimant doesn’t need proven negligence by the pet owner; it’s enough if the victim alleged he/she was peacefully conducting themselves in a place they had lawful access when attacked.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier has an exhaustive understanding of these critical aspects of Illinois’ Animal Control Act and strives to apply this proficiency when representing our clients.

It’s also noteworthy that dog bites may often lead to serious injuries with significant medical repercussions. The impact could range from minimal cuts or scrap

es requiring minimal attention-

• To severe puncture wounds necessitating surgeries and prolonged treatment,

• Or complications like bacterial infections demanding specialized care,

• And sometimes even causing permanent disfigurement affecting victims emotionally as well their social interactions.

Moreover, dog bite incidents often involve costs beyond visible injuries like PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), adjustment difficulties especially among children, along with potential loss of wages during recovery periods making it more multifaceted than it appears initially. At Carlson Bier, acknowledging these intricacies associated with canine-inflicted accidents helps us present a compelling case aiming towards full indemnity for all relative expenses incurred by our clients.

Legally handling cases involving minors is another area where specific expertise is necessary while dealing with dog attack situations since laws differ slightly concerning children.

• If your child becomes a victim of such an unfortunate incident, we take it upon ourselves to navigate the legalities and ensure rightful compensation as per the Act.

In understanding personal injury law and representing victims in dog bite cases, creativity and analytical skills also play crucial roles. With over years of cumulative experience in providing favorable outcomes for our clientele:

• Our professionals have formulated innovative strategies that stand up even against difficult odds,

• Proactively assemble evidence right from the beginning, including medical reports, photographs, eyewitness statements, and more,

• And utilize advanced negotiation techniques to protect clients’ interests during settlements.

Remember – Knowledge is power; Acting on that knowledge brings justice! Therefore seeking legal assistance promptly following a dog bite incident could make all the difference in securing appropriate damages. Protecting themselves from potential liabilities is what insurance companies do best. But at Carlson Bier – you come first because we understand each situation demands personalized attention along with adept representation.

If you or your loved one has suffered from a dog bite injury recently and feel uncertain about what steps to take next- let us be there for you. We are proud Illinois-based personal Injury attorneys who aim at delivering solutions driven by integrity, professionalism mixed with compassionate service. Do click on the button below to find out how much your case might worth- because realizing value complements getting justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mansfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mansfield

Areas of Practice in Mansfield

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending dedicated legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Trip Incidents

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Providing legal help for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents gain just settlement for hurts and damages.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Offering expert legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in delivering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Focused on legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Trauma

Expert in advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer