FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Marine

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Marine and have been a victim of a construction site accident, it’s crucial to entrust your case to skilled professionals who truly understand the intricacies involved. Enter Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm deeply versed in handling cases related to construction accidents across Illinois. Our expertise shines as we rigorously work hard tackling complex issues surrounding worker’s compensation, third-party claims, OSHA safety regulations and more. Our reputation precedes us not merely for our extensive knowledge but especially due to the outstanding results we consistently deliver on behalf of our clients. We stand out with a track record marked by successful verdicts won and significant settlements negotiated – testament to our unremitting dedication. What reinforces this trend is that Carlson Bier attorneys bring forth shrewd negotiation skills interwoven with aggressiveness tempered by compassion when advocating for client rights both inside or outside courtrooms across Illinois state including Marine.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Marine Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re a group of dedicated personal injury attorneys based right here in Illinois. We specialize in handling cases associated with Construction Site Accidents, offering top-tier legal services to help our clients achieve the justice they deserve. It is crucial to understand that construction site accidents often result in severe injuries or even fatalities due to the dangerous nature of the job role.

The first thing to note about construction site accidents is how commonplace they are due to numerous inherent hazards present consistently on job sites. Common reasons for these accidents include heavy machinery malfunctions, slip and fall incidents, hazardous substances exposure and inadequate training that leads to employee errors. Such scenarios can lead not only physical pain but also immense emotional stress, lost earning potential and significant medical expenses.

We’d like everyone affected by such circumstances to understand their rights fully under law. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) states stringent regulations regarding safety measures at workplaces including construction sites. If your employer has failed to adhere OSHA guidelines leading to an accident or injury happening through negligence, you might be entitled for compensation over your losses.

Here are some key points you need take into account following a construction site accident:

• Ensure immediate medical attention: Prioritize getting yourself checked by a healthcare professional as soon as possible after an incident.

• Document the details: Make notes about what happened while it’s still fresh in your memory; gather any witnesses’ contacts if there were any.

• Involvement of third parties: Assess whether a party other than your employer is responsible partly or wholly— this may alter case dynamics.

• Get quality representation: Engage an experienced attorney who specializes in construction workplace accidents like us at Carlson Bier

As seasoned personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, our team brings extensive experience representing claimants from various walks of life who’ve suffered different types of construction-site related injuries ranging from bone fractures or serious burns up till spinal cord injuries and traumatic brain injuries. We fight relentlessly for our clients in courtrooms to ensure their voices are heard and rights protected; securing them the maximum possible compensation they’re entitled.

Moreover, rest assured that we understand how critical this period could be for you and your loved ones as these cases can indeed life-altering. That’s why at Carlson Bier, we do not just offer legal services – rather a partnership committed towards recovery of what has been lost through experience, resources and sheer dedication. Feel free to explore numerous testimonials from our previous clientele who achieved favorable results with us on board – solidifying trust behind our representation.

Naturally, you may have countless concerns about the process ahead such as probable case duration or cost associated with filing a construction site accident claim under personal injury law. While all cases are unique in nature hence taking different time spans to resolve, it is worth mentioning that most workers’ compensatory claims get settled out of court hence within weeks or months after initiation. Concerning costs involved; remember – at Carlson Bier we offer ‘No Win- No Fee’ service ensuring no financial risk upon choosing us as your representatives.

We hope you found this information useful in understanding Construction Site Accident dynamics a bit better. It’s more crucial than ever to understand your legal rights following an unfortunate event like this while working here in Illinois—By empowering yourself with essential knowledge today, you’ll be much readier should a situation take place tomorrow!

Now it’s time for action…if any of these unwelcome experiences sound too familiar to what happened with you, click the button below right away! Find out how much your case might potentially be worth—with our proven track record of getting clients large compensations—eagerly awaiting people like YOU who need justice served rightfully now more than ever.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marine Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Marine

Areas of Practice in Marine

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving expert legal assistance for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering professional legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents obtain just remuneration for damages and impairment.

Scooter Incidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering adept legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Dedicated to providing specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in advocating for victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440