FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Marion

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from pedestrian accidents often leads to significant physical and emotional pain. As such, securing a proficient legal representation like Carlson Bier’s Pedestrian Accident attorney group is paramount for regaining control over your life in Marion. Our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier are highly experienced in providing superior advocacy that guards our clients’ rights while achieving the best results possible. We understand that each case carries unique circumstances and requires dedicated commitment, which we exhibit without exception. By choosing us as your lawyers, we promise to tirelessly interpret and navigate the precise statutes relevant to pedestrian accident law in Marion, Illinois.

Our team consistently renders meticulous attention towards establishing undisputed evidence, handling insurance negotiations proficiently and preparing compelling cases should courtroom endeavors become inevitable. Transparency is among Carlson Bier’s hallmarks; hence expect open communication about every step involved throughout this complex procedure.

The choice of an effective partner is vital for success when you pursue justice after a pedestrian accident incident; trust Carlsons Bier with this profound task- because everyone deserves their rightful compensation following injury due mainly to others’ negligence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Marion Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of highly skilled Personal Injury Attorneys based in Illinois, with expertise in various fields, one of which includes Pedestrian Accidents. Our law firm has earned an enviable reputation for our tireless dedication to helping victims recover maximum compensation for accidents they didn’t cause. We understand the devastating impact and emotional distress that pedestrian accidents can inflict on victims and their families.

Pedestrian accidents typically involve motor vehicles striking individuals on foot; unfortunately, the effects are often catastrophic due to the high vulnerability of pedestrians involved. Even seemingly minor incidents can lead to severe injuries such as traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), spinal cord injuries (SCIs), fractures, internal bleeding and even death. Further exacerbating these unfortunate occurrences is that most times these accidents are caused by reckless or negligent driving behavior including speeding, distracted driving, failure to yield right-of-way at crosswalks among others.

Here at Carlson Bier Law Group:

• We employ effective legal strategies tailored to each client’s unique case.

• We provide free initial consultations.

• Our focus is on achieving optimal results.

• We operate on a contingency basis – you pay nothing unless we win your case.

Given Illinois’ comparative fault laws regarding personal injury cases involving pedestrian accidents where both parties may be held partly accountable for the accident based on their respective degrees of fault – it makes it imperative for injured pedestrians to have knowledgeable and experienced counsel like us in navigating those murky waters successfully. Furthermore, gathering solid evidence quickly following the incident may prove pivotal in being awarded full compensation. This underscores why obtaining swift legal representation immediately after an accident cannot be overemphasized.

Regarding claiming compensation related to pedestrian accidents – medical bills could be colossal especially where long-term care is required due to debilitating injuries which sometimes prevent victims from working thereby causing loss of earnings- all these factors play into how much compensation would potentially be claimed. It’s therefore important that rightful claimants are not denied their due compensation due to lack of formidable representation.

It’s worth noting that Illinois has a Statute of Limitations – this is the legally defined timeframe within which a victim or their loved ones can initiate a civil lawsuit following an injury accident. In Illinois, this period expires after two years from the date of the accident in question for personal injuries and after five years on damages to property. This again illustrates why it’s essential to take immediate legal action following an accident.

As Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, our constant goal remains achieving maximum settlements for our clients with unmatched client service experience during the entire process. We provide detailed step by step guidance throughout each stage; armed with insight garnered from decades of combined, rich experiences in obtaining justice for past clients – rest assured we will intensely fight for your rightful compensation through settlement negotiations or trial if need be.

We believe passionately in advocating for those who may otherwise become victims of legal systems prone to alienate non-professionals. At Carlson Bier Law Group, we do not just offer legal counsel but also empathetic understanding recognizing that our clients are oftentimes dealing with one of the most challenging periods they have encountered.

Remember – at stake here could be potentially significant financial implications as well as a chance at security and peace you rightfully deserve following such disconcerting incidents. Therefore don’t hesitate – simply click on the button below now and find out how much your case is worth today! Rest easy knowing that you’re entrusting your claim into hands that won’t rest until they’ve done all within their means towards ensuring you ultimately get what you truly deserve!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marion Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Marion

Areas of Practice in Marion

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing specialist legal support for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Tumble Incidents

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for wounds and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Collision

Providing professional legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Building Incidents

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Specializing in offering expert legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Expert in supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​