Burn Injuries in Mark

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve experienced a burn injury, your world gets turned upside down. Carlson Bier relentlessly fights for those who have suffered burn injuries due to someone else’s negligence or action in Mark and across Illinois. Our seasoned team of attorneys is well-versed in the complexities of these types of cases and understands how traumatic they can be for victims and their families. With profound experience litigating serious burn cases, our distinctive approach combines compassion with aggressive advocacy, enabling us to secure maximum compensation for our clients’ pain and suffering, medical bills, rehabilitation costs and more. We take pride in restoring hope after disaster strikes by meticulously building a powerful case on your behalf while providing emotional support through difficult times. Yet it is our reputation as relentless advocates that truly sets us apart – ensuring those at fault are held accountable while preserving the crucial bonds between victims’ rights, justice system integrity

and client care standards within Illinois law landscape. Choose Carlson Bier – choose tenacity; Choose fight; Reclaim your life post-burn-injury.

About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Mark Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact of burn injuries on victims and their families. When you or a loved one are ravaged by such traumatic incidents, our personal injury lawyers situated in Illinois stand ready to provide unrivaled legal expertise and compassionate representation, from consultation to courtroom.

Burn injuries can range in severity; from first-degree burns affecting only the top layer of your skin, second-degree burns reaching the dermis below and leaving scars or leading to infection, to third-degree burns penetrating deep layers of tissues which could result in permanent damage. It’s crucial you know that these varying degrees do not just manifest various physical pains but also lead to potential psychological trauma and significant financial burdens due to medical bills and loss of income.

• First Degree Burns: Often resulted from brief contact with hot materials, sunburn or scalding liquids.

• Second Degree Burns: These occur when both the epidermis and part of the dermis layers of skin are damaged.

• Third Degree Burns: This most severe variation destroys all layers of skin along with nerve endings.

Aside from recognizing burn injuries’ categories, it’s essential also to understand how these unfortunate events might transpire. Residential fires, chemical spills, car accidents, faulty electrical wiring or equipment—these instances may root back tortuous actions where someone’s neglectful conduct contributed primarily.

Here at Carlson Bier law firm in Illinois, we leave no stone unturned when conducting an extensive investigation into your case. We delve meticulously into every element surrounding your incident intending to ascertain negligence leveled against guilty parties. Navigating complicated insurance policies is an area we particularly excel in as this endeavor often brings beneficiaries closer towards suitable compensation for their distress endured.

Moreover,the damages linked with serious burn injuries stretch beyond initial hospitalization costs.They incorporate long-term rehabilitation expenses,potential reconfigurations for accessible living,and probable lost wages during recovery.With our dedicated team,you’ll not lack adept assistance in pursuit of compensation covering these financial pressures.

Illinois law stipulates various factors to consider when calculating appropriate reparations, including victim’s age, severity of the burn injuries and their impact on quality of life. Lost earnings and earning potential are closely examined, so is the level of pain and suffering endured by victims. All these considerations make it imperative to have experienced personal injury lawyers like ours at Carlson Bier representing you.

Our legal team brings a wealth of knowledge in Illinois’ personal injury laws applied within burn injuries context, with notable success track record advocating for client privileges against large insurance establishments or culpable individuals. We also believe that quality representation should not be contingent on clients’ capabilities to pay upfront costs rendering us uniquely committed to a ‘no win no fee’ structure; providing our valued clientele peace of mind knowing they only cater for attorney fees after successful claim settlement.

One thing we guarantee is dedicated assistance as you embark upon this tumultuous journey post-burn-incident towards recovery and justice acquisition.Our proficient legal guidance will streamline intricate processes bound within making valid claims,safeguarding your rights thoroughly,and endeavoring that just compensation—spanning all harms suffered—is acquired.Navigating this challenging landscape shouldn’t be done alone—with Carlson Bier,you’ll have trusted allies championing firmly for your cause.

“Click here” beckons your first step into your rightful retribution plan.The button below offers an opportunity—it leads you onto an avenue where you can ascertain how much your case might potentially be worth.With our extended dedication towards providing high-quality representation,empathic practical advice,and rigorous advocacy from start to finish, rest assured that entrusting Carlson Bier,is taking the right direction towards achieving desired justice.Your story matters.Your rights matter.You matter.We invite you now—to tap into the promise we uphold: Let us help make it right!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mark Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Mark

Areas of Practice in Mark

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing professional legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing professional legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents gain just recompense for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring professional legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for harms.

Construction Incidents

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in offering professional legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Expert in advocating for persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer