FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mark

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a canine attack unfolds in Mark, Illinois, the ensuing effects may last far beyond the physical injury. Often plagued with emotional trauma and potential financial pitfalls due to medical bills or lost wages, victims need assertive representation at such times. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play— your reliable litigator for dog bite injuries. With an extensive track record of securing justified compensations for affected clients, we delve deeper than skin wounds to ensure that no aspect of your suffering is overlooked during compensation claims filing and adjudication. Comprising highly-qualified attorneys who are adept in the specific nuances of personal injury law, our proficiency stands unmatched. Our commitment never wavers as we pursue justice relentlessly while upholding professionalism and empathy towards our cherished clients.

Apart from litigation prowess, another crucial feature setting us apart is comprehensive understanding—regional guidelines applicable within Mark city jurisdiction included—for optimal results despite complexities surrounding each case.

In essence, if you’re seeking quality representation attuned delicately to your unique situation after experiencing a dog bite incident – turn confidently toward Carlson Bier; where client triumph underpins everything we do!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mark Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we fully understand the physical and emotional trauma that can follow a dog bite incident. As one of Illinois’ leading personal injury law practices, significant expertise in handling dog bite cases forms part of our professional portfolio. We provide first-rate service to ensure each client understands their rights and options after experiencing such an unfortunate event.

Dog bites are unfortunately common incidents but knowing your legal position is crucial in navigating these situations. In Illinois, the Animal Control Act holds dog owners strictly liable for injuries caused by their pet, even if the animal doesn’t have a history of aggression or harm. There isn’t any ‘one-free-bite rule,’ all damage is linked immediately back to the handler or owner.

Some critical aspects regarding dog bite injury law include:

• Establishing Ownership: The owner or caretaker may be held accountable even if they were not present during the attack.

• Identifying Negligence: You could be entitled to compensation if you can establish that negligence on behalf of the owner led directly to your injury.

• No provocation required: In Illinois, victims need not prove they did nothing to provoke the dog before it attacked.

The severity of injuries from such incidences often goes beyond mere physical harm. Victims frequently experience psychological distress like fearfulness or anxiety disorders as well. Additionally, medical costs for treatment related to diseases potentially transmitted by dogs like rabies only add to much financial insecurity.

Our mission at Carlson Bier involves both protecting your rights and ensuring just reparation for your losses. We are committed to achieving higher settlements for our clients while reducing most stress related to navigating this complex process independently.

Given our extensive experience with personal injury claims and comprehensive knowledge about specific factors influencing outcomes in dog bite cases – such as degree of victim’s fault, existence evidence (like photography/videos), interviews conducted with witnesses, along with detailed medical records – we guarantee outstanding representation throughout every stage of litigation procedures involved in securing maximum compensation payments.

Furthermore, remember that these traumatic events also carry an essential legal timetable. Illinois law stipulates a two-year timeframe within which you can claim damages from the incident – known as the Statute of Limitations. This critical aspect underscores why it’s crucial to approach a skilled personal injury attorney promptly after experiencing such occurrences.

With Carlson Bier on your side, you will not be tackling this pressing issue alone but with the support of experienced and dedicated professionals committed to securing justice for you fully and swiftly. We understand every case’s unique attributes and navigate each one accordingly, firmly believing in tailor-made strategies over general approaches because at our core we believe ‘one size does not fit all.’

Rest assured knowing we operate on a contingency basis; meaning if we don’t win, there are no lawyer fees. Affordability should never obstruct justice or deter anyone from claiming their rights.

The way forward after any personal injury incident is often fraught with uncertainty and difficulty – but having qualified assistance simplifies this journey considerably. At Carlson Bier, we empower clients by correcting misinformation about dog bite cases while affirming their right to fair compensation through rigorous advocacy.

Don’t let unanswered questions about your case cause undue distress; get proactive and arm yourself with knowledge instead. Extensive resources detailing everything from foundational aspects related to dog bite injuries—statutes governing liability—to more advanced analysis around specific case studies are available for comprehensive self-education purposes.

At Carlson Bier Associates, LLC., ensuring optimal outcomes for our clients is non-negotiable – be this met via pre-trial settlements or court victories achieved through formidable litigation prowess should things escalate that far.

Know what lies ahead before embarking unassisted onto potentially confusing legal pathways post-dog-bite incidents in Illinois: Enlist expert help today! Before navigating further alone amidst uncertainties surrounding legal rights and potential compensatory amounts due following pet-related attacks in Illinois – click on the button below. We offer a free case evaluation to determine how much you could potentially recover as compensation in your situation.

While we’re based in Illinois and legally cannot pose as personal injury attorneys within any city without having physically established offices there, clients throughout the entire state can confidently rely on our capabilities minus physical proximity constraints. Reach out today so we may commence helping relieve some pressure such an unsettling scenario has undeniably imposed onto your life! Let us guide you through understanding complexities surrounding personal injury claims in dog bite cases, thereby ensuring fair reparations due are indeed provisioned; just like they rightfully should be!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mark Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mark

Areas of Practice in Mark

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing specialist legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal services to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Tumble Injuries

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to helping individuals of car accidents gain reasonable compensation for damages and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Offering adept legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Damages

Expert in extending specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Specializing in representing individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440