FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Mark

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a pedestrian accident, selecting Carlson Bier as your legal representation ensures comprehensive support and unwavering commitment. As prominent personal injury lawyers in Illinois, our track record provides solid evidence of our expertise and relentless pursuit for justice. We understand how tragic pedestrian accidents can impact lives with devastating physical injuries and emotional trauma. Our team is devoted to preserving your rights while offering compassionate human support every step of the way.

At Carlson Bier, we adeptly negotiate on behalf of clients ensuring maximum compensation for damages is recovered swiftly from responsible parties. Complex liability matters or difficult insurance negotiations are handled with astute proficiency making us a reliable choice during such delicate times.

With an agile approach towards case representation, each claim’s unique circumstances are meticulously evaluated to formulate winning strategies that safeguard client interests first and foremost. We tirelessly strive to champion your cause bringing not only monetary reprieve but also peace amidst turmoil by demanding accountability from culpable entities.

For supporting you through this challenging phase post a pedestrian accident in Mark; trust precisely in Carlson Bier – namely known for compassion, competence & dedication!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Mark Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we extend our support and legal expertise to victims of Pedestrian Accidents in Illinois. Our highly skilled Personal Injury Attorneys leverage their vast experience to bring resounding victories for our clientele tangled in disastrous encounters with negligent drivers. We understand how traumatizing pedestrian accidents are, especially when considering the debilitating consequences often left unseen on insurance documents – the psychological distress, loss of income during recovery periods, physical pain, impact on personal life among others.

The repercussions arising from Pedestrian Accidents can be immensely intricate to navigate without adept legal counsel. At Carlson Bier – a premier law firm specializing in Personal Injury cases – we are determined to make this journey easier for you by studying every aspect of your case meticulously.

Here are essential points that cover what follows a Pedestrian Accident:

• Filing of Police Report: It’s crucial to file an accident report with local law enforcement while collecting details from the accident scene including contact information of eye-witnesses.

• Medical Attention: Prompt medical attention is not only critical for health reasons but also it establishes factual severity and immediate causation towards later claims.

• Legal Counsel: Consulting with a seasoned attorney at Carlson Bier ensures a thorough investigation is conducted promptly and accurately as we strive to protect your rights under Personal Injury Law.

In regard to Illinois Law related compensation after such tragic incidents, economic damages like medical expenses incurred (both present and future), losses due to inability work or lessened capacity thereof; and non-economic damages like physical pain suffering endured post-accident or emotional trauma felt as result are all factored into rightful claim amounts that may exist in your favor. This said Carlson Bier aims at ensuring full compensation for every harm inflicted upon you.

Legal Claim Against Responsible Party : Your experienced personal injury lawyer will scrupulously research factors leading up to accident before initiating proceedings against party-at-fault which may include reckless drivers, negligent roadway construction companies, vehicle manufacturers for malfunctioning parts and etcetera.

Statute Of Limitation: It is pertinent to note that in Illinois; a two-year limit exists within which lawsuits must be filed post-accident occurrence otherwise barring potential claims indefinitely. Hence timely consultation from Carlson Bier imperative towards lawsuit success.

Requesting Claim From Insurance Company : Our attorneys proficiently negotiate with respective insurance companies avoiding low ball settlement offers whilst maintaining your best interests at heart.

Understanding that this process can be overwhelming, you can trust Carlson Bier’s Personal Injury Attorneys who have years of experience navigating through the Los Angeles County legal system when it comes to fighting for Victims Rights in Pedestrian Accident cases.

By choosing us to represent you, we combine our keen understanding of personal injury law with our years of hands-on courtroom experience formulating unrelenting strategies geared toward bringing justice home. Working closely with medical experts and accident reconstruction specialists further strengthens case arguments reinforcing mere facts into palpable evidence that speaks volumes against perpetrators often resulting favorable settlements without setting foot inside a court room.

When such unfortunate incidents occur, do not deal with it alone – empower yourself by engaging experienced personal injury lawyers like us at Carlson Bier ensuring all possible efforts are channeled into securing fair compensation on your behalf! By clicking on the button below find out how much your case could potentially be worth – because every right denied deserves rightful retribution! Trust us as many others have – allow us to assist bring control back into your life amidst chaos after surviving an pedestrian accident ordeal today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mark Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Mark

Areas of Practice in Mark

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing skilled legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Delivering professional legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Tumble Occurrences

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Infant Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents obtain fair payout for hurts and losses.

Bike Collisions

Focused on providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Extending experienced legal assistance for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Engaged in representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in providing specialized legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440