FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mark

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can impact every aspect of one’s life. The legal complexities involved post-injury are just as exhausting and it is crucial to have expert guidance in these trying times. Carlson Bier offers exemplary legal representation for victims of spinal cord injuries, passionately committed to delivering justice while respecting the Illinois law protocols.

With the reputable attorneys at Carlson Bier, you gain not only depth of jurisdiction knowledge but a staunch advocate who comprehends this critically delicate situation with professional finesse and personalized attention. Our track record serves as testament; we’ve obtained significant compensations that account for medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost earnings, emotional distress and quality-of-life alterations.

In this challenging journey where your wellbeing hangs in balance past such an unnerving incident – trust the expertise our attorneys bring onto table as your formidable allies. We possess unrivaled proficiency dealing with intricacies spun by spinal cord injuries litigation ensuring assertive negotiation against responsible parties or insurance entities so as your rights aren’t dampened under ambiguous claims.

Carlson Bier: compassion wrapped in professionalism because fairness matters!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mark Illinois

Spinal cord injuries can profoundly impact all aspects of daily life. They often result in significant changes to a person’s mobility and overall health, frequently requiring long-term care and sometimes leading to permanent disability. At Carlson Bier, we are deeply familiar with the legal complexities surrounding such cases and strive to tirelessly advocate for victims suffering from these severe injuries.

Spinal cord damages typically occur due to trauma inflicted on the spinal column during accidents or violent incidents. The resultant impact differs based on the specific area of the spinal cord affected, ranging from paralysis of the lower limbs (paraplegia) to paralysis of all extremities (tetraplegia).

Knowing and understanding your rights can bring you one step closer to obtaining fair compensation for medical bills, loss of earnings, lifestyle modifications, pain, and emotional distress caused by a spinal cord injury. Fortunately, at Carlson Bier – as expert personal injury attorneys – our role is to guide you through this complex process, ensuring optimal outcomes.

Navigating through spinal cord injury claims often involves several key steps:

• Accurately proving negligence: This phase may involve working closely with accident reconstruction experts, police officers or eye-witnesses

• Quantifying damages: A detailed review of your medical records along with consultations with healthcare providers is critical here.

• Establishing causation: We will need concrete evidence that links the defendant’s negligent actions directly to your injury.

• Filing a claim within statutory deadlines: In Illinois, a two-year statute of limitations applies for most personal injury claims.

As your trusted representatives in court or negotiation tables involving insurance companies or defense lawyers; we remain committed towards obtaining justice for you while reducing potential stress related to legal proceedings.

At Carlson Bier law firm –though not located in Mark–our insights on litigation strategies pertaining specifically to this state combined with regular communication ensures that each client feels supported throughout their entire journey towards justice; thus manifesting our dedicated professional service to all residents of Illinois who need our assistance with personal injury claims.

More than obtaining compensation, we believe in helping you navigate a new life following a spinal cord injury. We understand the pain, fear and uncertainty that follows such an unfortunate incident. Carlson Bier aims at offering more than just legal representation – we offer hope through affirmation of your rights and will do everything to ensure you are fairly compensated for an injury largely beyond your control.

With vast experience in conducting thorough investigations, negotiation skills and knowledge specific to personal injury law together with medical expertise; every case at Carlson Bier is evaluated holistically while keeping our focus on getting the best possible outcomes for our clients.

Connect with us today – whether it’s questions about spinal cord injuries or related laws in Illinois or simply seeking professional guidance to deal with insurance companies – our comprehensive legal services can provide relief from various burdens associated with a compulsive lifestyle change post a severe spinal cord damage.

Regaining your life after a spinal cord trauma could be daunting. But, accessing rightful compensation shouldn’t be. The result of someone else’s negligence should not force you into financial hardship on top of physical suffering. Allow us to place our experience, knowledge and commitment at your service.

You’ve come this far, why stop now? Step further by clicking the button below and get immediate insights on what your case could potentially return as justified compensation from those responsible for altering your life irreversibly due to a detrimental Spinal Cord Injury.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mark Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mark

Areas of Practice in Mark

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing specialist legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering experienced legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Occurrences

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents secure fair recompense for harms and harm.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Incident

Delivering professional legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Committed to offering professional legal advice for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Committed to advocating for patients with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440