Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Markham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to slip and fall accidents, negotiating compensation can be a complex process. Having the right attorney group behind you is paramount. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in. With profound knowledge of Illinois laws and extensive experience with slip and fall cases, Carlson Bier provides expert legal representation that will ensure your rights are protected throughout the litigation process. Each case entailed detailed attention from our skilled team to successfully prove liability and ascertain fair compensation for incurred losses or suffering resulting from a slip-and-fall accident.Carlson Bier has zealously represented clients throughout various cities of Illinois including Markham, consistently winning substantial settlements for countless individuals affected by such incidents . The firm executes an unrivaled personal commitment to each client, continually ensuring their needs & concerns are prioritized.Explore how Carlson Bier’s application of diligent legal strategies could assist in your case because when you face something as critical as this, settling for anything less than best isn’t optional! Choose professionalism & proficiency;choose Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Markham Illinois

Slip and Fall Accidents are common occurrences that can lead to significant injuries. If such an incident has caused you discomfort, pain or any long-term damage, it is vital to understand your rights and explore the help a reputable law firm like Carlson Bier can provide – particularly given our expertise in personal injury law across Illinois.

Moreover, knowing what constitutes a Slip and Fall Accident is essential. These occur when an individual slips or trips on someone else’s property due to wet floors, poor lighting, uneven surfaces or hidden hazards. The key component here rests with proving negligence namely – if the property owner knew about the dangerous condition but did not resolve it.

We navigate through a bunch of critical questions- Did anyone witness your fall? What was the cause of your slip/trip and fall accident? Is there documentation for your railing injuries? Was medical treatment sought at all? Each point subtly underlines your case’s strength for achieving reasonable compensation.

Identifying negligence may seem like a tall order but certain criteria simplify this process:

– Recognition: Did the responsible party have awareness concerning the hazardous situation?

– Time Frame: Did sufficient time pass that action could have been taken to prevent harm?

– Actual Knowledge vs Constructive Knowledge: Can it be proven that they were aware of potential risks due to previous complaints or reported problems?

Carlson Bier will meticulously evaluate these details while also assisting you in establishing how damages should be calculated including medical expenses, lost wages if unable to work during recovery, future therapies necessary because of injury severity and even mental distress resulting from traumatic experiences.

Engaging a proficient legal representative ensures you achieve justice against those who neglected their duty towards maintaining safe environments. A crucial aspect involves timely reporting; contacting us immediately after experiencing slip-and-fall incidents allows efficient gathering and preservation of evidence which significantly adds value in presenting robust claims.

Another reason clients choose our comprehensive services pertains to contingency fees; no upfront expense burden is placed on you. Costs are recovered only when cases triumph leading to satisfactory settlements or verdicts. Remember, it’s not just about finances – emotional healing plays a significant part in the journey. We shoulder the legal wrestle leaving you free to focus more pointedly on personal recovery; upholding your well-being stays paramount throughout.

Let’s not forget insurance companies that might undervalue your circumstance thus diminishing deserved compensation- our expertise strategically steers through ensuring rightful amounts get disbursed reflecting all damages suffered in their entirety.

A quick recap highlights what sets Carlson Bier apart:

– Diligent determination of fault and accountability.

– Detailed assessment of the negligence element for proving your case.

– Comprehensive strategizing backed by formidable negotiation prowess with insurance companies.

– The heart to empathize with your situation closely coupled with legal astuteness.

In summary, if you’re trying to deal with a slip-and-fall event aftermath, don’t undergo this process alone risking missed essential points or rush decisions. Our knowledgeable team possesses the dedication and extensive experience required to handle such matters systematically while maintaining precise attention towards client needs.

Explore how we make dramatic differences standing as steadfast allies during challenging times by clicking on the button below – Let us evaluate undiscovered potential within every individual situation thereby making informed decisions necessary for charting favorable outcomes together. Claim this opportunity now; find out how beneficial professional representation can be – Discover real value in understanding what your case could genuinely be worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Markham Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Markham

Areas of Practice in Markham

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving expert legal services for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing experienced legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing professional legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Fall Incidents

Professional in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal support for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for harms and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Accident

Delivering adept legal services for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to extending specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Dedicated to assisting individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer