...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Maroa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Maroa, it is crucial to consider the assistance of a knowledgeable and experienced legal team such as Carlson Bier. Our attorneys stand at the forefront of personal injury law, specializing in dog-bite cases. We are fully conversant with Illinois state laws related to these issues and use our understanding to navigate complex situations for victims hungrily seeking justice, reinforcing their rights and negotiating fair compensation deals on their behalf. Our meticulously crafted strategies have yielded positive results throughout the years we’ve been active in this field. At Carlson Bier, attention is individually given to each case by our dedicated professionals who prioritize your needs above anything else. We believe everyone deserves access to superior legal advice following an unfortunate event like a dog attack; therefore don’t hesitate contacting us today—our commitment towards achieving optimum outcomes will certainly give you peace of mind during your recover process from Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Maroa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact dog bite injuries can have on individuals; our team stands committed to providing top-tier legal support for those affected in Illinois. Not only is a dog attack physically painful, but it can also be emotionally traumatic and cause lasting psychological damage.

As personal injury attorneys with extensive experience handling these kinds of cases, we recognize an urgent need for victims to obtain accurate information. Typically, understanding causes of dog bites is the primary step towards asserting your rights as a victim. More often than not, inadequate training or irresponsible behavior from pet owners lead to such situations. However, understanding a specific scenario requires thorough analysis.

When assessing liability post a dog bite incident, several key factors come into play:

• The owner’s knowledge about the dangerous tendencies of their pet.

• Circumstances surrounding the biting incident.

• State and local leash laws or any other related regulations.

In Illinois specifically, the Animal Control Act governs issues related to animal attacks and injuries judiciously. Victims might find solace in knowing that they don’t necessarily have to prove negligence or fault on part of the pet owner under this law – which certainly provides them with valuable leeway when seeking rightful claims.

Yet beyond legislation and theory lies practical execution – uncharted territory for most victims. This is exactly where Carlson Bier steps in: simplifying legal complexities and fiercely advocating your case – all while keeping you informed and assured every step of the way. Our services include gathering crucial evidence promptly after an occurrence (which often plays a significant role in proving claims), guiding you throughout if there’s any insurance company involved–to ensure that you are rightly protected—and tenaciously representing your interests professionally before juries if required.

The severity of any dog bite-related injury matters significantly since medical expenses incurred can vary widely depending upon specifics like depth and location of wound(s), follow-up treatments needed (like physical therapy), possible infections acquired & their management, and even aesthetic procedures required to restore normal looks (plastic surgery). Our team not only has an in-depth understanding of the medical aspects involved but can also provide a comprehensive picture of what your injury might cost you monetarily.

Mental health repercussions are another facet we don’t overlook while working towards getting you full compensation for your damages. Emotional trauma post such incidents often goes unnoticed and remains untreated; it’s important that monetary allocations be made for psychological help if needed.

At Carlson Bier, our primary commitment lies with those who need assistance navigating the complicated arena of personal injury law – particularly where dog bites are concerned. We understand what our clients are enduring – pain, loss, confusion – —and bridge them from chaos to clarity, offering courageous legal guidance and unwavering support at every stage of their ordeal. During these unsettling times, victims need a dollop of empathy drenched in professionalism: something we aspire to offer unstintingly.

Our dedication extends beyond providing stellar legal service; we ensure consistent education about personal rights, nuanced laws applicable to cases, impending challenges during proceedings, possible outcomes – essentially entrusting you with a panoramic view as well as microscopic focus on dog biting incident sequelae.

Remember that interpreting laws related to personal injuries isn’t always straightforward—nor is deciding the right course without proper perspective or foresight. If reading this gave you added insight into issues surrounding dog bite injuries—imagine how much more valuable personalized advice could be! Take a step towards justice and click on the button below to find out how much your case may indeed be worth.


So reach out today because at Carlson Bier remember this: Every Client Matters! Justice is Mandatory! Compassion is Not an Option! Decide wisely so your future self thanks past-you for acting judiciously now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Maroa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Maroa

Areas of Practice in Maroa

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Giving expert legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Extending expert legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving defective products, offering expert legal assistance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Tumble Injuries

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for wounds and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Crash

Offering adept legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Expert in offering dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Committed to advocating for victims with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​