...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Marshall

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re residing in Marshall, and unfortunately have been a victim of dog bite injuries within the city limits or even beyond, Carlson Bier is your premier choice for legal representation. Our firm harbors seasoned personal injury attorneys who are experts in handling dog bite cases with a robust familiarity of Illinois state laws that apply to these kinds of injuries. Underestimating the consequences of such incidents can lead to significant medical expenses; thus it’s crucial to get reliable legal guidance from an adept entity like ours at Carlson Bier. We meticulously work on thoroughly investigating each case, gathering all required resources and evidence while ensuring our clients get rightful compensation they deserve under the law as quickly as possible. Navigating through this complex process would be challenging without professional guidance – which is what we offer best! With us, it isn’t just about winning cases; it’s also about ensuring you feel supported throughout these strange times. When faced with canine inflicted traumas where justice seems elusive, choose excellence – Choose Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Marshall Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we serve as advocates for victims of dog bites; understanding and navigating the complexities of personal injury law in Illinois with every case we handle. Dog bite injuries can range from minor scratches to severe wounds requiring extensive medical treatment. The aftermath of such incidents certainly brings psychological trauma alongside physical pain, which could demand professional help. We are here to stand by you during this tough time and ensure you get due justice.

Dog Bite laws in Illinois assign responsibility to pet owners when their pets harm others unprovoked. This legal obligation applies regardless if it is the first instance or there’s a history of aggression; even without prior knowledge about the animal’s harmful tendencies. In essence – if your injury results from an unprovoked dog attack, you have a right to pursue compensation.

There are several important aspects concerning dog bites to consider while making legal claims:

• Understanding ‘One Bite Rules’: Unlike other states where dogs may be granted leniency for their first offense under what’s called a “one-bite rule,” that’s not the case in Illinois.

• Gathering Information: Following a dog bite incident, obtain critical information about the owner like name, address and details about the dog including its vaccination records etc.

• Reporting Incident: It is mandatory to inform local health departments. Police report might also be helpful depending on severity of the incident

• Seeking Medical attention: An immediate checkup from healthcare professional ensures your wellbeing plus strengthens your prospective legal claim

Our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier assist clients damaged by dog bite accidents day-in-day-out – walking them through each step necessary for securing compensation deserved after dealing with painful physical injuries or emotional distress resulting from their ordeal.

Speaking further on compensation, you may seek damages for different expenses associated with your incident:

– Medical bills related to emergency room visits, surgeries,

physical therapy, medications etc.

– Lost wages due to inability work caused by recovery period

– Pain and suffering, emotional distress that comes after

such traumatic episodes

– Permanent scarring or disfigurement caused by injuries

Remember, each case is different, requiring unique handling adapting the circumstances surrounding your injury. It is important you consult professional attorneys who understand the intricacies of personal injury law to maximize your compensation.

At Carlson Bier, we prioritize our client’s need with a steadfast dedication towards their cause, providing strategic representation through an in-depth understanding of Personal Injury Law in Illinois. We acknowledge the fact – dealing with aftermath of dog bite incidents are hard; but makes it easier when you’re not going at it alone.

Our job doesn’t just center around representing our clients effectively before legal entities but also addressing qualms clouding their mind during these times – explaining terms like ‘Strict Liability’, negotiation scopes against Insurance Companies etc., assuring them they aren’t alone navigating through this complicated pathway seeking justice and what’s rightfully theirs.

In conclusion, here at Carlson Bier would be honored to represent clients from across Illinois, assisting them following any unfortunate instances involving Dog Bite Accidents. If you have found yourself entangled in one such incident – reach out to us without delay!

The button below is your first step towards finding out how much your claim could be worth. So why wait? Click on it for a comment-free review of your case details by experts from Carlson Bier today! Remember, time matters when it comes to filing legal claims. Allow us to expedite things before deadlines lapse concerning crucial opportunities within your pursuit of justice or potential compensation payout eligibility expires as per governing laws – thus painting bright prospects ahead post trauma you recently underwent.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marshall Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Marshall

Areas of Practice in Marshall

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying specialist legal advice for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Extending specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying skilled legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Trip Accidents

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Committed to helping victims of car accidents gain reasonable payout for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Collision

Providing adept legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Construction Crashes

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Specializing in supporting victims with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​