FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Marshall

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a spinal cord injury, time is of the essence. Choosing an attorney who specializes in personal injury cases such as these is key to ensuring you receive just compensation for medical expenses, loss of earnings and suffering. Carlson Bier stands proudly as one renowned law firm specializing in this type of litigation. We understand the trauma and challenges that follow spinal cord injuries; therefore, we strive to offer compassionate legal services while fighting tenaciously for your rights.

We are mindful not only of Illinois statutes but also intricacies specific to Marshall citizens’ experiences. Our grasp on intricate laws becomes our strength when representing you effectively in court or at settlement tables.

Beyond just advocacy, our team provides guidance through the labyrinthine health care system too—offering practical advice from years handling similar cases across Illinois.

At Carlson Bier, superior knowledge equals unmatched results—an equation that makes us your best consideration if you require a dedicated lawyer for spinal cord injuries representation without direct mention about where we’re based! For unparalleled service and trusted expertise—consider Carlson Bier today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Marshall Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we deeply comprehend the life-altering impact that Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) can have on an individual’s life. As personal injury attorneys, we are dedicated to providing our clients and readers in Illinois comprehensive insights into the various intricacies of SCIs, all with an aim to both educate you about your situation, as well as support you through the recovery journey.

Spinal Cord Injuries primarily result from traumatic events such as automobile accidents, falls or violence – to name a few. They are devastating injuries which may cause damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at its base. This causes permanent changes in strength, sensation, and other body functions below the site of the injury.

Understanding these aspects forms a crucial component when it comes to negotiating settlements or arguing cases in court; resources gathered post extensive research make for compelling evidence and stronger case presentations. Two significant types of SCIs include complete SCI where there is absence of sensory feeling below injury level, and incomplete SCI marked by some neuronal connections under injury site.

Yet another key dimension worth noting here is that symptoms differ greatly depending on severity and location of the SCI. Some persons experience pain or paralysis while others may suffer from reduced respiratory capacity among other symptoms.

As personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on delivering client-centric services that cover every aspect: medical expense reimbursement claims, seeking compensation for loss of wages due to inability to work post-injury etc. We believe our commitment lies not just in pursuing legal justice but also in serving as a compassionate counsel during this time.

• Importance of an experienced attorney representation is unparalleled evidently since such cases often entail high stakes.

• Your attorney at Carlson Bier will comprehensively review medical records & consult medical professionals who know your specific type of SCI.

• Legal considerations need not add up onto your ordeal – allow us to shoulder this burden & aid you towards focusing solely on recuperation.

The complex and often overwhelming nature of the law further stresses on the need for professional representation, especially in cases as serious as SCIs. In this context, the highly experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier are adept at navigating these complexities to bring our clients the maximum compensation rightfully due to them.

With a reputation built on hard work, persistence, and integrity, we ensure all your possibilities are exhausted when it comes to pursuing justice for SCIs inflicted by negligence. Our prime priority remains securing optimal medical care for you or your loved ones who could be suffering from an SCI right now—and that starts with empowerment through education like this one.

No doubt, life post-SCI can indeed be daunting; however, knowledge instills power – power that assures potential victims: they aren’t alone in these trying times. As such, commitment beyond courtrooms begins here.

Without another moment’s hesitation or uncertainty about what step to take next—please consider clicking on the button below so we may serve you better by providing a no-obligation consultation regarding how much your case is worth. Value yourself just as much as we do; every individual deserves rightful justice and utmost dignity.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marshall Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Marshall

Areas of Practice in Marshall

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending professional legal assistance for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Extending specialist legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for harms and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Extending professional legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Collisions

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in offering expert legal representation for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Expert in defending patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​