Bicycle Accidents in Maryville

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Trusting Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury attorney group in Illinois, is a clear decision when seeking dependable legal representation for bicycle accidents. Bicycle accidents often lead to severe physical injuries and immense stress; thus it’s vital to acquire the expertise of proficient lawyers like those at Carlson Bier. Our attorneys specialize in untangling complex litigation processes involved with these types of cases, taking on the intricacies so you can focus on recovery. We understand every case is unique which grants us the sensitivity required to handle each claim efficiently and effectively. Sheriff-centered communication aids cultivating tailored strategies that guarantee maximum possible compensation for victims in Maryville fallen prey to such unfortunate incidents. That regulated determination drives our wide-reaching success across various cities within Illinois including Maryville; though we do not operate a specific office here per se, this certainly doesn’t deter us from offering steadfast commitment or limit our capacity to represent residents exclusively dealing with bicycle accident-related claims diligently and successfully. Choose Carlson Bier for authentic advocacy and astute negotiation skills essential in obtaining rightful settlements.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Maryville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that navigating the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be overwhelming. Our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys is here to offer expert guidance and superior legal assistance. Located in Illinois, our law firm specializes in representing victims of bicycle accidents—helping clients secure compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering.

Unfortunately, bicycle accidents are recent occurrences that have seen significant increases due to various factors such as negligent drivers. These mishaps lead to severe injuries which sometimes results in permanent disability or worse, loss of life. While wearing protective gear like helmets can reduce risk, the fact remains: cyclists are unprotected compared with motor vehicle occupants.

There’re varying scopes within bike accident cases. These include but aren’t limited to collisions with motor vehicles at intersections when motorists fail to yield appropriately or ‘dooring’ incidents where a cyclist crashes into an abruptly opened car door. Other common causes revolve around:

– Poor road conditions including potholes.

– Reckless driving by motorists such as speeding and disregard for traffic signs.

– Distracted or impaired drivers who may not see cyclists until it’s too late.

Understanding how cycling laws apply in these scenarios is crucial—and this is where our expertise comes in handy at Carlson Bier.

Illinois operates under a concept known as “comparative negligence.” This means even if you were partially at fault for your accident—such as not using a signal when changing lanes—you’re still eligible for compensation; however, your damages will be reduced according to your percentage of blame.

Certainly then, proving negligence involves complexities only firms like ours can effectively handle. We aim to build compelling cases supporting claims that other parties owed you duty-of-care and breached this responsibility resulting in harm.

Moreover, Illinois statute imposes strict time limits known as Statute of Limitations within which injured parties must file their case—increased delays could jeopardize chances of fair settlements hence urgency is always advised.

At Carlson Bier, we evaluate all aspects of these complicated laws while reassuring clients that they’re in capable hands throughout the process. Our seasoned team works diligently to ensure maximum compensation for victims.

We also realize taking legal action can be daunting as such instances involve emotional and physical distress; therefore, our focus isn’t just on litigation—we provide compassionate counseling respecting every individual’s unique journey through recovery.

Remember—it’s vital not to take hasty decisions but seek guidance from a skilled injury attorney before discussing anything with insurance companies whose interests significantly differ from yours—they aren’t your allies after an accident. It’s worth noting too—trying to self-navigate these intricate paths may lead to settlement amounts falling short of what you genuinely deserve—a pitfall avoidable through partnership with us at Carlson Bier.

Undeniably, bicycle accidents are traumatic events leaving victims grappling with uncertainties regarding future wellbeing and security. In such trying times, retaining expert representation like ours can make the difference between justice served or being a victim twice over—once due to the accident and secondly through improper resolution of it legally.

Now it comes down to whether going forward alone adds up better as against harnessing alignment provided by refined professionalism; remember—you don’t pay until we win so there really is no downside choosing us. This shared contingency clause ensures best efforts deployed by attorneys since outcome shapes final fees.

The next step depends on you—we believe every case deserves insight only experts offer therefore if now feels like time for action then please click on the button below & fill out short application form—let’s begin evaluating what your claim could truly be worth together! Your road to recovery starts here at Carlson Bier: our promise lies in bending towards justice for those knocked off course physically and financially after plunging into unforgiving realities native within bicycle accidents occurring throughout Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Maryville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Maryville

Areas of Practice in Maryville

Bike Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing professional legal assistance for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Offering professional legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering adept legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Stumble Injuries

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for wounds and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Accident

Providing specialist legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Injuries

Dedicated to delivering specialized legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on assisting clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer