FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Maryville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with spinal cord injuries, you require an experienced team of attorneys like Carlson Bier to guide and represent your legal rights. A spinal cord injury can significantly impact your life, bringing unexpected emotional and financial burden in its wake, thus it’s crucial to have top-tier expertise on your side that forefronts your needs. Recognizing the complexities of these specific cases, we specialise in managing lawsuits around such catastrophic injuries. Spanning years of successful claim settlements for clients who suffered similar trauma , our track record speaks volumes about Carlson Bier’s diligence in fighting for justice and deserved compensation. We’ve mastered Illinois law intricacies tied up with this delicate niche assuring a seamless litigation process translating into positive outcomes against insurance companies or negligent entities responsible for causing harm; all while maintaining stringent adherence to professional ethics as per state regulations . Consider partnering with Carlson Bier – committed advocates proficiently handling spinal cord injury related claims throughout Illinois area. Discover why countless individuals rely upon us during their difficult times because Your case deserves best!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Maryville Illinois

As expert personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to letting the public understand the implications of a significant matter within our jurisdiction, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). These types of injuries can be life-altering and impose drastic changes in an individual’s quality of life. Having represented numerous clients who fell victim to such circumstances, we wish to share comprehensively what it entails.

SCI occurs when there is damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. This often leads to permanent alteration or loss of strength, sensation, and other body functions underneath the area of injury. The effects depend highly on two factors: where on your spine was injured and how severe that injury is. However devastating this may sound, developments in research and technology continually provide hope through innovations easing SCI patients’ lives.

Here are some realities about SCI everyone should note:

• Immediate emergency care is pivotal after an accident leading to potential SCI. Lack time could increase damages.

• There’s no sure way to reverse damage brought by SCI up-to-now; though rehabilitation programs can significantly help patients return maximally functional living.

• Although anyone can experience a spinal cord injury at any point in their lifetime, they most commonly affect individuals aged 16-30 since this age group has a higher tendency for risky behavior leading to accidents causing SCIs.

• Car accidents top as the number one cause contributing approximately 38% percent of all SCIs yearly, followed by falls which make up nearly 31%.

Understanding these facts gives perspective towards appreciating our adeptness in handling cases affecting one’s wellness terribly – like SCI – serving justice promptly every single moment.

Moreover, if you or someone you know suffers from an SCI due to another party’s fault or negligence system law offers recourse enabling compensation expenses caused because someone else did wrong. Costs linked with medical treatment after an SCI are astoundingly high.

To illustrate further,

* Over a year, expenses can reach $1 million for the most severe SCIs and average around $350,000 for other types.

* Lifetime costs related to SCI vary from around $1.1 million to nearly $5 million.

These figures exclude indirect costs like lost wages, benefits, productivity which on average amounts up to about $72,000 per year. Financial stress adds burden already hefty with physical pain emotional trauma injury victims carry.

At Carlson Bier, we deal with every personal injury case – especially in dealing extensively with SCIs – rigorously dedicated notwithstanding its complexity. Our proficient attorneys never shirk from ensuring our clients’ rights are defended as they fight through the hardest times they met by chance; we strive hard that justice served fair swiftly decided.

Indeed pursuing compensation alone after an accident inflicting spinal cord injuries daunting task covering many legal intricacies best addressed by professional know-how’s hands. Thus, partnering reputable law firm such as Carlson Bier provides rightful direction increasing your chances of winning needed compensations supports recovery beyond just financial aspects—it significantly contributes overall recuperation process suffering off another individual’s reckless actions.

Feeling overwhelmed is normal if you or a loved one is battling a challenging journey inflicted by an SCI cause by someone else’s recklessness or negligence—the feeling of losing control over your own life and future might creep into every waking moment. But don’t despair—remember that under Illinois Law you have the right to seek appropriate compensation for the injustice done against you.

It is time to take back what was taken away from you unfairly— your peace of mind and financial stability. Find out how much your case may be worth so that you can start envisioning regained control over steering life’s wheel once again smoothly despite challenges ahead promising brighter tomorrow leaving such dark past behind eventually completely surely because deserve no less than justice served fairly quickly undoubtedly certainly consequently definitely thusly indeed warranted

Click on the button below now and take that significant stride towards reclaiming what is rightfully yours.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Maryville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Maryville

Areas of Practice in Maryville

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending specialist legal help for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal services for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal services to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Crashes: Focused on helping clients of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Crash

Offering expert legal advice for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Building Incidents

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Specializing in extending professional legal representation for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Committed to supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440