Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Mattoon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a slip and fall accident, who can you trust to safeguard your rights? Carlson Bier are the advocates that understand your plight. We specialize in representing victims of slip and fall accidents, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their injuries. Our team is equipped with expert knowledge on Illinois laws governing these types of accidents. We meticulously analyze each case, utilizing years of experience to assemble a compelling argument tailored specifically for you. Despite countless successful cases secured within Mattoon’s jurisdiction, our pursuit is driven by delivering justice rather than numbers; each victory signifies someone able to rebuild their life post-accident thanks to us at Carlson Bier – an achievement we celebrate profoundly. Service doesn’t end in the courtroom either; we believe in supporting you until full recovery: physically, emotionally and financially because at Carlson Bier it’s about being not just lawyers but also trusted allies navigating tough times together.We are your local representation no matter how remote or intricate your situation might be — always there when you need us most – relying on expertise beyond geographical boundaries.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Mattoon Illinois

The consequences of a slip and fall accident can often be severe, leading to extensive medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering. However, understanding the legal rights in such incidences proves crucial. Illinois-based personal injury law firm Carlson Bier specializes in representing victims of these accidents determinedly seeking proper compensation for their losses.

Slip and fall accidents typically occur when a property owner has shown negligence towards maintaining safety standards on their premises. For example, this could manifest as wet floors without warning signs, poorly lit areas making visibility tough or uneven pathways with no caution indicators—all scenarios displaying an inherent disregard for visitor safety. This is more commonly referred to as ‘premises liability.’ Carlson Bier treats every case with unique importance giving personalized attention on piecing together the factual sequence of events surrounding the unfortunate incident.

This raises the question: what qualifies one for eligibility to claim damages? The law mandates that if negligence was recklessly present resulting in harm—be it personal injuries or other related damages—a claim is clearly warranted.

Key factors necessitating evaluation include:

• The party at fault’s obligation toward safety:- Did the property owner show responsible ownership by keeping their premises safe?

• Condition of location where accident occurred:- Was there an inherently dangerous condition present that caused your fall resulting in injury?

In most cases around slip-and-fall claims determining a just resolution depends substantially on evidence detailing how direct negligence resulted in the victim dealing with physical suffering and financial hardships. Be ready to collect important documents related to your medical records including reports, invoices etc., photos from site of incident showcasing danger lurking therein coupled alongside witness testimonies if available.

Furthermore it’s advisable not shy away from documenting personal recounts about daily routine disturbances bearing impacts due to injury sustained formulating tiny yet significant specifics in courtroom battles!

Timing after such circumstances becomes paramount too! Seeking immediate medical counsel stands foremost considering delay might inadvertently harm validity depicting urgent care behavior necessary post-accident chronology. Remember Illinois Statute of Limitation states giving two year window filing personal injury claim starting from accident date.

Selecting formidable legal representation with Carlson Bier places you in experienced hands, optimizing your chances for fair compensation through our outcome-focused litigation approach. We pursue every case meticulously, arranging resourceful evidence to establish grounds of negligence on part of the party at fault, aiming towards ensuring maximized recovery scope for sustained injuries and losses.

Taking into account pain, suffering due to disability or inability to work & emotional trauma fall under ‘compensable damages’. Your medical expenses—present and future are recoverable too! Payment comes generally via insurance company covering liable party however instances indicate defendants pour right out their pockets incase insurance fails meet damage amount!

It’s understandably a complex process but having professional guidance increases likelihood fair reparation substantially. Bear in mind that we apply no-win-no-fee strategy placing trust before cash!

Accidents may occur unpredictably leaving one bewildered but remember – immediate action proves decisive insuring apt justice retrieval when faced extreme adversity! No matter what spin challenges impose count upon Carlson Bier’s unwavering support seeking rightful compensation making post-injury life less strenuous! To take your first step towards assessing worthiness potential slip-and-fall incident click button below—a move possibly signifying victory initiation against unsuspected mishap repercussions bridging injustice gap!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mattoon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Mattoon

Areas of Practice in Mattoon

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying professional legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending experienced legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering adept legal help to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Slip Occurrences

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents get equitable payout for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending professional legal assistance for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on offering expert legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on defending clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer