...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Maywood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a pedestrian accident in Maywood, you need more than just medical aid; strong legal help is necessary. This is precisely what Carlson Bier offers. Our specialty lies in connecting victims with top-notch personal injury attorneys skilled at navigating complex Pedestrian Accident cases. We understand that each case harbors unique circumstances and requires an individualized approach for achieving favorable outcomes.

Attempting to recover without professional legal assistance can be burdensome and quite honestly, perilous. From dealing with insurance companies to understanding intricate laws protecting your rights, it’s a demanding journey that we believe no one should tread alone.

When you choose Carlson Bier as your staunch advocate following a Pedestrian accident, rest assured all aspects get thoroughly addressed: from proving liability to negotiating settlements or fighting tooth and nail for justice inside courtrooms .

Our commitment doesn’t just lie on paper; our track record speaks volumes about us representing clients effectively across Illinois. At the crossroads of traumatic experience and seeking restitution lies Carlson Bier – guiding you make those difficult yet necessary strides towards healing and fairness.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Maywood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that taking the first step to seek legal guidance following a pedestrian accident can be daunting for many. These accidents occur unexpectedly and often leave victims grappling with life-changing injuries. As personal injury attorneys specializing in pedestrian-related cases in Illinois, we offer unrivaled advocacy to our clients by combining experience, knowledge, and compassion.

Pedestrian accidents refer to incidents where an individual walking on foot is struck by a vehicle. Oftentimes, these accidents are caused due to driver negligence—including speeding or distraction—and sometimes due to poorly maintained roads or infrastructure. As per Illinois traffic laws, pedestrians have the right-of-way at crosswalks and intersections; thereby when this law is violated leading to an accident, those involved must be held liable.

Addressing such scenarios requires precise knowledge of pedestrian laws and understanding how they apply. At Carlson Bier, we’re well-versed in representing your rights against insurance companies who might try to shrink their obligations towards you. Additionally, our firm’s expertise includes but is not limited to:

• Proving the at-fault party’s negligence;

• Mediating talks with insurance firms;

• Assessing medical records accurately for claims calculations;

• Guiding through complex legal procedures in Illinois;

• Nurturing close attorney-client relationships built on trust.

We firmly believe it’s crucial for everyone brought down by such misfortunes—irrespective of whether fault lies partially with them—to understand their rights under Illinois law:

• You have the right to claim compensatory damages post accident which include both ‘economic’ (such as lost wages and medical bills) and ‘non-economic’ (like pain and suffering);

• A contributory fault rule applies wherein if a pedestrian was partially responsible for causing the accident, still can make claims proportionate only to their non-liability portion;

• If you lose a loved one in such an incident, wrongful death claims allow survivors rights over compensation.

Many clients often arrive at our firm seeking answers on “how much their case is worth”, which understandably so since pedestrian accidents are usually life-altering. However, in truth, determining the exact value of a case depends largely on its unique facts-nuances and can vary widely from one incident to another.

For evaluation, your attorney would need detailed insights about:

• The severity of injuries sustained;

• Medical costs incurred due to these injuries—including present and likely future expenses;

• Missed work days along with potential loss of wages or incapacity affecting earning potential;

• Pain and suffering undergone by you and/or your loved ones.

Time also plays an indispensable role in such circumstances as Illinois follows a statute of limitations that typically allows for two years following the accident date to file personal injury claims—though certain conditions could either shorten or extend this limit which needs appropriate scrutiny.

It’s essential to approach skilled lawyers who offer top-level representation coupled with genuine empathy over client situations. With decades-long experience upon shoulder, Carlson Bier offers result-oriented legal service through every step assuring optimal recovery from whatever harm caused.

We comprehend how being involved in a pedestrian accident can be a frightening ordeal leaving victims overwhelmed about their choices ahead. A part of our service inclination therefore lies in educating people about their options letting them make informed decisions eventually working towards getting back life control post such misfortunate incidents. Remember, your rights matter just as much whether you were partly at-fault or not—you’re entitled seamlessly to all help available ensuring accidental aftermath cope-up becomes less burdensome financially-emotionally both.

Leaning upon us is feasibly like opting for legal support that’s transparent, honest reaching out to clients all across Illinois—proven by variety cases taken up loads won successfully delivering justice meanwhile building unforgettable relationships backed trust-respect blend.

Your fight becomes ours moment we take up your cause promising strategic guidance born out expertise aligned best interests always remember, we advocate for undeserved victims like you pushing through change within something far beyond mere professional obligation—because at Carlson Bier, we passionately believe in what we do. Begin your journey towards justice with us today—simply click the button below and our personal injury attorney will provide a free case evaluation helping metabolize how much your lawsuit might be worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Maywood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Maywood

Areas of Practice in Maywood

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying specialist legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Offering expert legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Slip Occurrences

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for wounds and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Crash

Ensuring adept legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in ensuring professional legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Committed to defending patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer