Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in McHenry

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a dog bite injury, choosing the right legal representation is paramount. Carlson Bier stands out as a foremost choice in advocating for victims of these unfortunate incidents. Our keen understanding of Illinois legislation surrounding dog-bite liability elevates our personalized approach to successfully representing our clients’ interests. We maintain an impressive record of securing fair compensation damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain or suffering associated with such incidents. When working with us, you can expect a team prioritizing your well-being and rights; committed to holding those responsible accountable. With extensive experience handling personal injury cases including dog-related injuries in McHenry and beyond – this serves as testament to our adaptability across diverse jurisdictions in Illinois-find comfort knowing that Carlson Bier takes each case personally and fights aggressively for just outcomes on your behalf. Trust us: because at Carlson Bier we believe every client deserves justice served efficiently & powerfully without compromise!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in McHenry Illinois

For all who turn to Carlson Bier, we extend our assurances of quality legal assistance backed by years of experience handling personal injury cases. We are proud to serve the citizens of Illinois as a reliable, results-oriented law firm.

Encountering an uncontrolled canine can be a terrifying experience, and unfortunately often culminates in a serious dog bite injury for unsuspecting victims. Carlson Bier is extensively experienced in handling such incidents and comprehends the imperative nature of tracking down every necessary detail. Dog bite injuries may cause severe health implications like infections, disfigurement, or psychological trauma which demand immediate medical interventions. You need to know your rights if you are at the receiving end of a dog attack.

Let’s look into some essential aspects:

– Legal Duties: Owners hold legal responsibility for their pets’ actions in Illinois ensuring that they refrain from causing harm.

– Strict Liability Rule: Illinois implements the “strict liability rule,” making pet owners accountable even if their animal had never demonstrated aggression before.

– Exemptions: A victim might not be entitled to compensation if accused of provoking the dog or trespassing the owner’s property/privacy during the time of incident.

We strive tirelessly towards serving people who’ve endured pain due to others’ negligence and have consequently suffered substantial financial burdens due to medical treatments or lost wages following missed workdays. These costs rightfully should not fall on your shoulders alone.

At Carlson Bier, we understand every aspect involved with these kinds of cases: collecting pertinent records; liaising with healthcare providers; establishing grazing habits and histories; determining ownerships – merely calling it comprehensive wouldn’t do justice! In fact, we assemble thorough evidence when presenting your case before insurance companies, aiming for fair compensation encompassing your past and future expenses resulting from this ordeal.

In addition to securing quick resolutions, our noteworthy accomplishments also include amassing sizable settlements successfully negotiated by demonstrating skillful understanding regarding the idiosyncrasies of Illinois dog bite injury laws. Our law firm’s proficiency and tailored guidance aids clients as they navigate convoluted legal roads on their path to obtaining the rightful compensation they deserve.

We understand your pain; we empathize with your physical and psychological suffering due to an experience no one should endure. With utmost devotion, we strive towards alleviating those financial burdens incurred in treating such injuries that ensue from these episodes, recognizing your predicament when faced with unforeseen expenses all while grappling with trauma and recovery demands.

Available for consultation and enlightenment at any stage throughout this challenging journey, Carlson Bier is committed to asserting your legal rights by combining astute scrutiny of an incident’s particulars upon initiating an effective course-of-action against liable parties. This distinctly established approach differentiates us due to our keen ability for presenting convincing arguments that maximize our clientele’s benefits conclusively.

Dog bites are more than just flesh wounds – their implications seep deeper into victims’ lives beyond visible harm or superficial scars. We stand unwaveringly beside every individual who entrusts us during such traumatic circumstances, facilitating a more manageable recovery phase through complete attention to their claims.

The sensation of impending legal complication shouldn’t exacerbate existing distresses caused by a dog bite injury. Hence choosing a qualified personal injury lawyer becomes instrumental – at Carlson Bier, not only do we earn settlements but also provide peace of mind throughout this strenuous process.

Congratulations! You’ve taken invaluable first steps toward understanding the complexities around dog bite injuries in Illinois by exploring this informative resource provided by Carlson Bier. Now would be the perfect time to implement what you’ve learnt today: click on the button below now to determine your case’s worth because when it comes down to fighting for justice after being unjustly harmed – never feel obliged into accepting less than you truly deserve.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For McHenry Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in McHenry

Areas of Practice in McHenry

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing specialist legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring professional legal services for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Slip Incidents

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure fair compensation for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Collision

Delivering professional legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Concentrated on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Dedicated to delivering expert legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Expert in advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer